The problem may lie in the brainwashing that occurs in these forums.
Many people think that any and every knife,
regardless of brand, should exhibit the following characteristics:
- PERFECTLY centered blade. If it appears one micron off, then it is flawed.
- A specific percentage of lockup, 50% to 90%, out of the box, depending on the users preconcieved notions. This is insane. (Personally, I prefer as little lock up as possible, it leaves more room for wear.)
- No blade play whatsoever! None! Not one nanometer!
Now that expectations have become completely unrealistic, enter CRK.
The word 'Perfect' is thrown around a lot. So, prospective buyers believe that is what they will get. Even if their last Al Mar, or whatever, was flawless, they expect a CRK to totaly knock their socks off. They seem to believe that 110% perfection exists.
It is interesting that the OP, who has written many threads touting the flawless perfection of the Seb. has only recently realized that his knife isn't all that after all. Or, maybe he is just seeing a problem that isn't really there, due to his unrealistic expectations. Since he didn't bring this flaw up immediately, upon purchase, it makes one wonder why the story has gone from 'this is the best knife ever', to, 'I'm disapointed'.
Perhaps the knife is flawed and he just wanted to believe otherwise for a time. I don't know. Either way, the story line doesn't add up.
Knifemakers must be wringing their hands seeing all the perfectly acceptable, within spec, returned knives that they see coming back to their factory with 'problems' that aren't really there. Can you imagine how many knives CRK will have returned if they give the impression that 'good enough, isn't good enough'? They will go out of business.