Anyone have the MKC Montana yet?

Status
Not open for further replies.
thebrain said:
I wouldn't. He is obviously compromised or he would address the low hardness of the steel he designed.
Click to expand...

What exactly does he need to address re possible hardness of the steel? He developed the steel and worked with a mill (foundry?) to bring it to market. What responsibility would he have regarding one manufacturer's particular preparation of the steel unless he is directly working with the manufacturer?

Is Kraft responsible for Altoona Style "Pizza"?
 
Larrin is all over their website and clearly gave input on the steel to the company. I understand he is respected here just not by everyone. I accept my infraction happily. Others mention politics in the same thread and did they receive any infractions?
 
thebrain said:
Larrin is all over their website and clearly gave input on the steel to the company. I understand he is respected here just not by everyone. I accept my infraction happily. Others mention politics in the same thread and did they receive any infractions?
Click to expand...
You have not provided any evidence regarding his being responsible for any issues with the manufacture. Clearly, many other outfits are capable of proper production.

So, if you cannot provide evidence, don't make allegations. Or you will not be posting further in this thread.
 
thebrain said:
I never said he was responsible for the heat treat , I said he clearly consulted on the steel. That is a fact shown on the MKC website. Do whatever you feel necessary, but be honest/fair and give infractions for politics outside of WC or admit the rules mean nothing.
Click to expand...

Hold on, are you referring to this page on the MKC site?

*I know this is a link to a non-supporting manufacturer, but it is pertinent to the discussion. I will delete if necessary.**

www.montanaknifecompany.com

MagnaCut Knife Steel: The Complete Guide

See why CPM MagnaCut steel delivers toughness, edge retention, and corrosion resistance in a single blade, straight from the metallurgist who designed it.
www.montanaknifecompany.com www.montanaknifecompany.com

I speed-read through it and see a general description of Magnacut and its characteristics and an in-depth discussion in the form of a Q & A with Larrin Thomas about the properties of Magnacut. The page describes differences in performance between 59 and 64 RC and concludes that the steel will perform well at any point in that range, although there are tradeoffs at every point on the spectrum.

So, Larrin was consulted on the steel. MKC chose to use the steel and elected to temper it at a hardness it deemed prudent for its purposes. We can disagree on whether their choice was prudent, but I'm not quite sure how Larrin has become compromised in this scenario or why his opinions here are illegitimate. Can you please explain why Larrin's input here is questionable?
 
Last edited:
thebrain said:
My suggestion is that humans cannot be objective when close to a situation no matter the person. Not being in the Larrin fanclub seems to bunch panties.
Click to expand...
Larrin consulted with Buck. Their Magnacut is fantastic. Trust me, I've spent big in their CKS.

MKC apparently didnt listen to expert advice. That isnt Larrin's problem.

Back on topic.

Buy what you can, use what you buy.
 
the design for this knife is pretty interesting. I can't imagine it being very useful for edc, compared to the standard dropped point/mellow belly that is useful for general stuff. Where I think it would shine is for the hunters, not that I have any experience with that- the pronounced belly, the narrow width/deep finger bay behind the guard, the easy to index straight spine all scream hunting knife. Makes sense, given the company's core brand proposal.

so far as I know, there aren't many purpose built folding knives designed specifically for hunting. In fact, there are more folding knives designed for nothing in particular on the market, so I'll give props to MKC for that.

as for calling out Larrin in this thread in a negative way, and saying it's ok because other people's names/broadcasters were invoked- and that somehow that was political- is kinda dumb to be honest. As for bias, yeah I think Larrin is a hero who has done so much for knife makers and users without seeming to expect much in return. Haters gonna hate, I guess.
 
Let's please get back on topic. One member has lost posting privileges in this thread (and received warnings) for pushing an agenda without providing substance. Baseless allegations will not be tolerated.

Back to knife discussion. Several off-topic posts have been moved offline.
 
SharpBits said:
View attachment 3220982

Screenshot from Blade Magazine for those wondering what the fuss is about.

Hard pass from me, not that anyone cares.
Click to expand...
I actually like the lines on it, it's not a terrible design. Looks generally useful. My issue is it's a drop of water in an ocean of countless near identical competitors that are offering more, for less money, and usa made.

I can't fault the guy who lists his used napkins on ebay for 100.00 or the chick that sells her used bath water, if people will give you their money... sell it to em. I know I won't be giving them my money.
 
I'd also add, companies are being created to cash in on knives, without the precision, quality and history for crk prices and is a turn off. For me anyway. And not just for mkc, any of these companies following the same model, but I don't think the average knife buyer knows or cares any different.
 
Looks like it could work really nice as a travel steak knife, and just mediocre for about anything else.
My 0581 Barrage handles that role perfectly for me. So I'd have no use for the MKC.
 
Last edited:
Kinda with others, if it was a spear or wharncliffe I'd probably be more interested (ignoring the price and steel stuff). Not a real fan of high points relative the pivot, but the handle looks nice enough: no choil, good guard, and index still can get close to the edge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top