The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Sounds like a jealous knifemaker trying to subtly bash Sal.I had a discussion at the Blade Show a few years ago with a very well known knifemaker about testing factory knives to the point of failure. He said Spydercos did horrible due to the Spyder Holes taking a big chunk out of the blade right by the spine and weakening them. I think the Spyder Hole was pretty revolutionary when first used, but would seem obsolete when we have flippers (Thanks, Kit Carson, RIP) and thumbstuds. It looks like a trademarked liability to me now. I have owned and liked many Spydercos, but I never EDC them as my sole knife. I do not abuse my knives and can tell the difference between them, hammers, and prybars, but we do not always choose our circumstances and life threatening events. I do my best to remain knowledgable about brittle steels, bad design, and faulty locks. I was wondering what others think about the Spyder Hole and does it exclude Spyderco from their line ups.
http://spyderco.com
Sounds like a jealous knifemaker trying to subtly bash Sal.
Hmm... Way to loose a customer before I even became aware of a product...
Yup... It is actually its a bigger weakness than a hole with the same minimum radius, given a blade with the same minimum sectional area of the blade.
If one is going to pick on a silly point to try and shill a design its best to make sure the design isn't even more flawed... LOL...
I have post graduate education (Masters courses in Mechanical Engineering from one of Canada's most prestigious universities) on this subject (fracture mechanics), if you choose to question my expertise, then feel free to take four years of Mechanical Engineering and then we can discuss the post grad material in depth.![]()
Why are you being so condescending? OP had a legitimate question. Also, engineering and applied physics are two different fields.
Yes, it matters that it weakens the blade.
There is no possible way for any manufacture to foresee the extent "normal" use. There's an acceptable failure rate, not from abuse, with any product that the company accepts rather than spending more on R&D.
Also, look at how much companies celebrate their knives' locking strength. There's a certain point that something is going to give.
This is oddly simular to the Mantis Army stunt of 2011?
😱
After the "event" it destroyed what little credibility they had left. Looks like Combative Edge is on my list of never buy.
I think that says it all.I just threw all of my Spydercos into the ocean and immediately purchased a Combative Edge PX-41. I never really considered the fact that any day now I'll be using my knife as an impromptu jaws of life. I'm really glad that I am prepared now that I have a Combative Edge PX-41. Thank you, RockCowles!
That's a huge tang on that thing.