Beckerhead firearms

Hoss, whats the real difference between the two ? They look identical, and the price point isnt terribly far apart.

The Sport II is an entry level rifle, the barrel isn't chrome lined the handguards don't have heatshields, and in general it's a bare-minimum rifle. The colt is ~another $200 and for that you get basically an overall higher quality gun that will run harder and longer. Now, if you're not the kind of person that worries about trading bullets with bad people, or at least values that ability in a gun, then you won't notice the difference and don't need to spend the extra money.


I'm thinking about building one so I'd only buy the parts I want vs buying upgrades then trying to sell the ones I don't. I understand you can build a better rifle than you can buy for the same price anyhow. So why not build one? I mean that way I'd also know how everything works and where everything goes.


What parts do you want that generally don't come on a factory gun? What do you want to use the gun for? I suppose those are going to be factors in buying vs building.

Just about anyone can put a gun together that works at the range. I've done it with less the the recommended minimum tools. I don't think I really want to trust that particular gun for anything important and I know I didn't get a better gun than I could have bought for the same money at the time, maybe as good. It was a good learning experience so in that regard, go for it. But with AR's where they're at, I would say most folks are better off just buying a gun with a warranty. A S&W Sport II is ~$650 and MAYBE if you spend a month or two doing the research and carefully selecting parts you can build roughly the same quality rifle for roughly the same money, and that's just the cost of parts and tools. Doesn't factor in the time involved. Time you could spend enjoying your new gun or with your family or anything more fun than in front of a computer screen figuring out what parts to buy and how they go together.
 
The Sport II is an entry level rifle, the barrel isn't chrome lined the handguards don't have heatshields, and in general it's a bare-minimum rifle. The colt is ~another $200 and for that you get basically an overall higher quality gun that will run harder and longer. Now, if you're not the kind of person that worries about trading bullets with bad people, or at least values that ability in a gun, then you won't notice the difference and don't need to spend the extra money.





What parts do you want that generally don't come on a factory gun? What do you want to use the gun for? I suppose those are going to be factors in buying vs building.

Just about anyone can put a gun together that works at the range. I've done it with less the the recommended minimum tools. I don't think I really want to trust that particular gun for anything important and I know I didn't get a better gun than I could have bought for the same money at the time, maybe as good. It was a good learning experience so in that regard, go for it. But with AR's where they're at, I would say most folks are better off just buying a gun with a warranty. A S&W Sport II is ~$650 and MAYBE if you spend a month or two doing the research and carefully selecting parts you can build roughly the same quality rifle for roughly the same money, and that's just the cost of parts and tools. Doesn't factor in the time involved. Time you could spend enjoying your new gun or with your family or anything more fun than in front of a computer screen figuring out what parts to buy and how they go together.

Sometimes I get board at work and have some free time there. Plus a co-worker is building one too so we talk about it too.

For a CCW yes that's my pick.
For fun & cool I'll take a bobtail.
NIX
If you want to build a AR take a look at PSA.

I have been. I like their marauder barrel. I'm looking at the new frontier trigger groups because I like the ones I've shot. Short reset, lighter pull, haven't experienced a light printer strike with one. Flat top rail, magpol flip sights, vortex spark 2, full auto bcg from psa. I've been looking a lot at parts, and other options.
 
PSA does have good stuff. The rifle I put together was a stripped PSA lower and their Magpul LPK and there haven't been any issues with it.
 
Springfield TRP. Just because I really want one myself. What are you looking to spend. Springfield has very good options at almost every price point.
 
f092d8d93d55342b40b98628b889081d.jpg


Get a little one


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Next 1911...Colt or Springfield...go.

Springfield in a heartbeat. Colt isn't as nice a gun at WAY more money. Ruger / S&W and Springfield all make good 1911s around the same price point but of the three (and you can throw in some that cost quite a bit more) I'd take the Springfield all day long.

If I could get the Colt for the same price as the Springfield, I probably would but then I'd be inclined to sell the Colt, buy the Springfield and spend the extra money on mags / ammo / holster (though not in that order).
 
I am kinda with Hickock45 on this one. I think a three inch barrel would make it really hard to pass up. Not sure how I feel about it in a 2 inch barrel.
 
The 2" barrel makes .357 magnums more or less pointless but it would makes a nice launcher for .38 +p.

S&W is coming out with a 2.75" 66 which would be a nice concealable woods gun for magnum ammo.
 
Back
Top