Originally posted by cpirtle
Guys,
I certainly don't like sending a knife in for warranty any more than anyone else does. But that fact of the matter is that the Axis lock uses some small parts that can beak.
If it is possible for Bm to get better springs I'm all for it. But before I come here telling everyone that BM needs to redesign their lock, or purchase better springs I need some hard facts as to how many of them break.
If the number of broken Omega springs has been 100 and BM has produced 100,000 knives with the Axis lock, that is a .001 percent failure rate.
Just because a few people here have said theirs broke, that is nothing scientific.
Benchmade is a company that has always tried to improve on their product. When there were a lot of reports about their QC and customer service they worked to improve it.
If they see a high failure rate in their springs they'll improve on them, or people will stop buying the knives.
Until then, the best thing you can do is send your knife in for a repair of the Omega spring, this way BM can know if and when they have another one broken.
A couple of years ago I swore off Benchmade for a while because I thought they were lacking in QC. No I own 8-9 newer generation BM's and all of them exhibit excellent QC (with centered blades).
So, I don't disagree with your premise that the product should be as good as it can be, I disagree with the way you are impuning the product because of your perception.
Okay cpirtle (and others),
I think we're coming more to a point of agreement here.
I don't think anyone is outright picking on Benchmade. Certainly, I'm not trying to. I may be giving that impression but only because I'm using them as an example. Many forumites can attest to the fact that I always recommend the 710.
I also agree that bolt action locks have a lot of parts that can go wrong and complex by design. You do not have to convince me of this as I qualified that a week ago in support of the Axis lock.
Most importantly, no one is questioning Benchmade's dedicated after sales service, and warranty. I think some of us, as concerned knife nuts, want to know if Benchmade is aware of the sporadic spring breakages and whether they have addressed this to those that manufacture the springs for them. I find it curious that SOG claims they have had no reported spring breakages in 2 years of the Vision being introduced.
Nor am I naive enough to believe that products should NEVER break, be 100% defect free, or that manufacturing is a simple process. Nobody has claimed that. For those of you who think that's what I'm implying, you're missing the point.
Speaking for myself, and perhaps komondor, I think we question those of you out there -- not you in particular cpirtle -- who erroneously conclude that it's okay to excuse products with flaws because a warranty will rescue it. Or worse, companies that idlly sit by without trying to work out kinks in their products. Once again, I'm speaking in general; not picking on Benchmade or the knife industry.
A prime example of this is Microsoft products. They'll launch products with security holes, and flaws in them just to beat their competition or to meet a release date. Then the poor consumer has to keep going to their download site to get patches! They could have the best aftersales service in the world, but it doesn't make it any easier for their customers who has to go to the trouble and the subsequent downtime.
That's all I'm pointing out. I'm not picking on Benchmade. I'm picking on manufacturers in general and -- yes, as BobbyB at the SOG Forum pointed out -- I admit it's a bit idealistic for me to believe every manufacturer would put in ISO-like standards into their processes; it's expensive to do that. However, I'm saying wouldn't it be nice if they did and strove to continuously improve and work out and limit any flaws in their system before it got to the consumer? This would reduce subsequent headaches to all parties involved. Yes?
To conclude, I think the misunderstanding between some of us here is that on the one side there are you realists out there who are saying: "This is the way it is, these are the parameters and limitations...live with it." While there are the idealists and dreamers like myself who are saying, "Yes, but it could be much better if they would..." None of us are disagreeing that we want quality products, our problem is that we are just looking at different parts of the whole.