Bladesport chopper

I bought one of the Benchmade 171 Competition Choppers and have used it a lot. It is CPM M4 at 60 Rc and is spec'd for entering the competitions. I have since thinned the edge waaaay down to a more respectable thickness. While the knife is very heavy I would not hesitate to use it as a camp knife, and have with great success and pleasant results. There is nothing like limbing a walking stick with a knife designed for supreme performance, also chopping and splitting wood is an enjoyable chore.

creature, you may consider messaging Dan and asking him directly. From all the times I have spoke with him he is rather free with sharing information.
 
In terms of affordable steels like 52100, do you guys think there would be any better options for my first chopper?

As far as being significantly better in that price range, I kind of doubt it. But for practice and playing with the geometry, any of the simpler steels would work pretty dang well - O1, 1084, L6, etc etc. Personally I would go with 52100 and ask Brad at Peters for his input on how it should be heat-treated.
If it chips, just thicken up the edge a bit.


Also, the only thing I haven't been able to figure out yet is the blade geometry on these things... Anyone know where I could find some more technical specs on these blades?

Official BladeSports website/knife specs.

BladeSports said:
#1 Maximum knife size specifications:

Blade Length – 10" (measured from the front of the handle to the blade tip)
Overall Length – 15" (measured from the back of the handle to the blade tip)
Blade Width – 2" (measured at the widest part of the blade)
Blade and Handle Thickness – No restrictions

#2 From the plunge cut at the ricasso through the knife tip must be a single plane. No swells or bulges are allowed.

#3 False edges and grinds along the spine to reduce weight or drag are allowed.

#4 Added weights forward of the handle are not allowed.

#5 No holes in the blade forward of the handle will be allowed except for integrals where the blade is measured from the plunge line. The lanyard hole can be placed to the rear of the plunge line which would be in the guard or ferral on an integral.

#6 All Handles must have at least 1 visible pin or tube that passes through the handle material and tang.

#7 All Knives must have a secure lanyard hole with a sturdy wrist lanyard. BladeSports International, Inc. event officials may disqualify any knife if the lanyard system, in any way, presents a safety hazard.

#8 The Osborne Safety Lanyard is recommended.

#9 All Knives must have a sturdy sheath to be allowed in the event area.

#10 It is recommended that knives be built with a full or a full tapered tang. Hidden tang designs are acceptable with the following restrictions:

Only tangs that have been drawn soft to eliminate brittleness are to be used for hidden tang designs.
The event officials at any BladeSports International, Inc. gathering may ask questions to determine if hidden tang knives meet specifications.
Due to the possible loss of strength in the tang area a lanyard must not pass through the tang on a hidden tang knife, unless it is an extended tang behind the hand grip area.
All hidden tang knives made with air hardened steels should be submitted to the Board for approval before a competition.

#11 No part of the handle (or guard) shall extend further forward than the rearmost part of the cutting edge.

#12 All knives must have been tested prior to competition.

#13 All knife design features are subject to the approval of Officials

#14 Production Knives

A knife will be considered a “production knife” if more than 20 of the same design are manufactured commercially by a BladeSports International, Inc. sponsor in a 1-year period.
Two (2) finished models and one (1) heat-treated blade blank must be sent to a designated BladeSports International, Inc. official for testing prior to approval.
Production knives must conform to all current BladeSports International, Inc. knife specifications.
Each approved production knife will have a certificate designating it as a tested and approved model.

BladeSports International, Inc. accepts no responsibility and gives no guaranties for the performance of any knife. Knives that are submitted must successfully pass a number of extreme tests before the design is approved.

Notice there are no restrictions on blade thickness... most are at least 1/4" thick at the spine, and many are much thicker. 5/16" thick seems to about average. The actual grind is up to you. Most of them are FFG almost to a zero edge.
 
Last edited:
First of all, I'm a little late to the party, but hopefully I can be of some benefit to somebody reading this thread. I was told about I last night and didn't have time to answer.

A little introduction, I'm Donavon Phillips and have been competing and involved with BladeSports for about 8 years now. I'm going to start by answering the OP's question as best I can, based on my opinion and experience.

Before I start that, here is a link to an older thread I went back and found that may be of interest to some. Most of the information in this post is still accurate, although some things have changed. I will be glad to answer any and all questions related to the old thread or this one. http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/670087-Cutting-Competition?highlight=dphillips

Let's get started.

Okay so I'm thinking about getting into bladesports and wanna build a chopper. I'm probably gonna go with either 52100 or possibly M4. What I'm trying to figure out is the bevel angle. I know they're usually 2in wide blade made from .25in thick stock(and that's probably what I'll use). Most of the ones I've seen are close to a full flat grind with about a .25in of saber on the spine.

What bevel angle do I need to be considering? Also, what kind of edges are these guys running? Convex?

I'm also looking at using some horse stall mats for the handle. Is there any other material i should be looking at?

Any advice on making one of these would be greatly appreciated.

52100 is fine choice for a first chopper, I started with 5160 and after being around some 52100 later, I wish I could've used that. I have limited experience with 52100. Dan and Jose Diaz have used it with great success. I'm looking into acquiring some A2 for testing, I plan to use it for prototypes and less expensive option to M4, if it tests out satisfactorily. I want to try A2 because from reading and talking to other knifemakers and steel guys, it is a good option for stock removal makers like myself. It is also readily available in all thicknesses and widths and is air quenched. I'm not set up real well in my shop for oil quenching, I don't use enough of it.

Knife maximum size is 10" blade, measured from tip to beginning of handle material, handle material and edge cannot overlap. 2" wide and 15" long. I recommend starting with 5/16" stock. You want to end up with a 1 lb 5-7oz to start with, that's my opinion. The Benchmade 171 falls in this range is one of the lightest blades currently used in our sport. I also highly recommend a tapered tang, this is to push the weight toward the tip for chopping. I would start with a full flat grind and go from there. Cleaver or traditional point will be up to you, the reason we use the cleaver style is to push the weight toward the tip. We don't stab in competitions because of our mission statement, which in short is to promote knives as tools. So stabbing media sends the wrong impression, especially to young people.

Bevel angle I can't give you. Not because I won't, because I don't know. I full flat grind all my comp knives, you could saber grind thinner stock to end up with more weight if you desire. I moved up to 3/8" stock and full flat grind it and try to leave as close to full thickness at top as I can. The tapered tang thickness and length determines balance more than anything. Most of mine are tapered roughly 1.5" in front of the plunge lines.

Edges, this also varies with each competitor, I have found I prefer to grind my blades thinner before sharpening and then put a V edge on them. The shoulders of the V strengthen the edge in my opinion. I used to use a convex edge and discovered this by accident when re-sharpening my blades by hand after competitions. Yes, I re-sharpen my comp blades by hand with DMT stones, we'll get into that later if there is interest.

Horse stall mat is a definite in my book. It absorbs shock and grabs you back when your palms start sweating and your hand gets covered in water from the water bottles. Handle shape is as important as the blade shape to me. Actually, my blade stays the same on my knives now, but I'm still playing with handle drop and handle shape.

I will gladly tell you everything I know, which may not take long, depending on what you ask. ;)

From my limited understanding competition choppers are made ONLY to chop the things in the competitions: golf balls, tennis balls, 2x4s, rope, thick cardboard tubing, etc... There is never ANY use for a tip in these competitions so the majority of blades are squared off at the end. A camp chopper might be used to pull double duty(utility/chopping) and therefor might need a tip. Other than that there are specific criteria fo the choppers used in Bladesports. 15in overall length and 10in blade. Watch some bladesports competitions on youtube and you'll understand.

I use my comp knife as a camp knife, do I recommend this to customers who buy a true comp knife? no I don't. But so far I haven't had any trouble with mine. Not having a tip/point on my knife doesn't bother me because I don't go with just one. I have a belt knife and a folder that both have points when I'm in the woods.

Exactly. That's my understanding as well. My only problem is that I don't know if I can bring myself to drop out on a big slab of m4. There so expensive, I'd be afraid I'd screw it up. I guess at some point u just gotta shit or get off the pot...

It is not necessary to start with M4. In fact, I don't recommend starting with it. Most likely you will go through several designs, blade and handle, before you settle on a design. M4 is expensive, and hard to work. There are advantages to it. It holds an edge well. It is reasonably tough, tough enough for what we do. It doesn't require re-sharpening after every competition, usually a stropping is all that is needed, if that. We can run it at a higher Rc, mine comp knives are 60-62 HRc. And most importantly, it is readily available. The biggest advantage to me is how long I can use it for competitions before I have re-sharpened it to the point that the edge is too thick for my liking. The longest run I've had so far is 3 years on one knife, that was practice and comps. The edge thickness was still decent, but I was to the point of worrying about failure after that long and that gets in your head. And I just wanted a new to play with :)
I'll get into newer steels later, if interested.

So do you think 52100 would be too inferior to m4? I see that Jose Diaz(president of bladesports) makes a good amount of his choppers out of 52100. If that steel is comparable to m4 then I'd rather use it since its about half the price.

As stated above there are advantages to M4, for some. I'll use 5160, because I have more experience with it. When I was using 5160 I had to re-sharpen it after every competition, it would no longer shave hair in the more used spots and wouldn't slice newsprint cleanly. At the time, I didn't mind this because I was new and was developing my knife design, I changed knives so often then that I couldn't have afforded M4. With 5160 and the stage I was at with BladeSports, I changed knife design before I "wore" the knife out by re-sharpening. Once I got closer to the design I wanted and worked for me I changed to M4 and haven't really looked back. With M4 I don't have to re-sharpen after every cut, I just hone. So my knife lasts a longer before having to make a new one. I can also grind it thinner and run it harder, so that helps too. 52100 is a good medium ground between these two points, once again, this is not from personal experience. It is knowledge I've gained from other competitors.

Wow, thanks for all the great info gents. I think I might have come to a decision in regards to what I'm gonna use for the steel on my first competition-style(probably won't compete for a while)knife. The info gleamed in this thread really helped. I think I'll use 52100 for my first blade and build technique/skill with it and if I decide I want to compete down the road I will buy a slab of M4 and make another one. This initial blade will give me time to get familiar with the blade design and refine it for a M4(or other expensive super steel) knife later on.

In terms of affordable steels like 52100, do you guys think there would be any better options for my first chopper?

Also, the only thing I haven't been able to figure out yet is the blade geometry on these things. I've looked for a bladesports forum and done "bladesports knives" searches on google and haven't been able to dig up much. Anyone know where I could find some more technical specs on these blades?

Again, thanks for all the great insight folks, I really appreciate it.
I don't think you'll go wrong with 52100. If you don't have the mean to heat treat it yourself, I highly recommend Peter's Heat Treat. Tell Brad that the knife is for a comp knife. Dan and Jose have worked with him a lot on the heat treat for 52100 for BladeSports.

I touched on the blade geometry earlier as far as primary grind. Full flat and adjust to weight with saber grind if you wish, or up the stock thickness. I wish I could give you angles but I don't know. I recommend grinding the edge down to ~0.018" before sharpening. I believe the Rc that Dan and Jose use for 52100 is 58-60 HRc.

I hope this helps and feel free to hit me up at anytime with more questions. bigdknives@gmail.com

Ya'll have a good night,
Donavon
 
There is a lot of talk on here about the new steels that Dan is using. I sent Dan a link to this thread, I'm hoping he will have time to join in and give us his opinion on this. He is currently in school to become a chiropractor and has to dedicate a lot of time to that. So I will tell ya'll what I know from what he and I have discussed. Dan is currently testing these steels (PD1 and Vanadis 4E). Some of you may know that Dan's swords are made from 3V, so PD1 is one he wanted to test. His testing with Vanadis 4E has been going well. Several of us used a Vanadis 4E knife he made for a weekend of demos in Texas back in April, I lost count on what all it cut, but it was impressive. And was all but unaffected at the end of it. It holds some good promise from what I've seen. The problem with it right now is availability, getting it in 3/8" thickness is very difficult. When I can acquire some I plan to test it out also.

If anyone has any questions that they want me to try to answer feel free to ask. If it is a question that has already been asked in this thread just quote it and ask me. I don't want to bore everyone by going back and answering them all.

Ya'll have a good night,
Donavon
 
Here is the blade geometry on a comp style chopper I've been playing with. It is a little over 3/8 thick at the spine and has a full blended convex grind with about .015-.020" behind the edge bevel. The blade is 11"x 2"x16.5 OAL and 39 OZ's of 80CRV2.
image by waterstoneblades, on Flickr
 
Here is the blade geometry on a comp style chopper I've been playing with. It is a little over 3/8 thick at the spine and has a full blended convex grind with about .015-.020" behind the edge bevel. The blade is 11"x 2"x16.5 OAL and 39 OZ's of 80CRV2.
image by waterstoneblades, on Flickr
Is that the one in your Avatar? Nice looking blade, like the effects on it.
 
Won't be making that one. I went last year and had a blast.

Well I look forward to meeting you another time!!

Im excited to be going, i have yet to even see any events in person, so this should be an awesome experience.
 
The knife on my avatar is from the same pattern. The knife pictured here has different blade geometry and performs very well on live timber.
 
Here is the blade geometry on a comp style chopper I've been playing with. It is a little over 3/8 thick at the spine and has a full blended convex grind with about .015-.020" behind the edge bevel. The blade is 11"x 2"x16.5 OAL and 39 OZ's of 80CRV2.
image by waterstoneblades, on Flickr

That blade looks completely different from the others I've seen in this thread. Wouldn't the thin tip work against you in competition?
It's a lovely blade, and I don't know much about competition cutting so my confusion is probably my own fault.

Edit: I misunderstood the angle of the photo, that's a cross-section view of the blade isn't it?
 
Well I look forward to meeting you another time!!

Im excited to be going, i have yet to even see any events in person, so this should be an awesome experience.
Just curious, are you a maker? It will be, good group of guys up there.
 
That blade looks completely different from the others I've seen in this thread. Wouldn't the thin tip work against you in competition?
It's a lovely blade, and I don't know much about competition cutting so my confusion is probably my own fault.

Edit: I misunderstood the angle of the photo, that's a cross-section view of the blade isn't it?

Yes, sorry I wasn't clear on the picture. The blade was positioned upright looking down on the nose when I took this image.
 
There is a lot of talk on here about the new steels that Dan is using. I sent Dan a link to this thread, I'm hoping he will have time to join in and give us his opinion on this. He is currently in school to become a chiropractor and has to dedicate a lot of time to that. So I will tell ya'll what I know from what he and I have discussed. Dan is currently testing these steels (PD1 and Vanadis 4E). Some of you may know that Dan's swords are made from 3V, so PD1 is one he wanted to test. His testing with Vanadis 4E has been going well. Several of us used a Vanadis 4E knife he made for a weekend of demos in Texas back in April, I lost count on what all it cut, but it was impressive. And was all but unaffected at the end of it. It holds some good promise from what I've seen. The problem with it right now is availability, getting it in 3/8" thickness is very difficult. When I can acquire some I plan to test it out also.

If anyone has any questions that they want me to try to answer feel free to ask. If it is a question that has already been asked in this thread just quote it and ask me. I don't want to bore everyone by going back and answering them all.

Ya'll have a good night,
Donavon
Donovan
Thank you so much for taking the time to thoroughly answer all these questions.
Brad and I have been working with bohler uddeholm to get some more of the Vanadis 4E in 3/8" stock. I will make sure you get some when it arrives.
Dan
 
Really nice posts Big D. Thank you for chiming in.

And right on on the V4E Dan. Hope it all works out.
 
It's worth mentioning that Donavon is the current National Champion, and Executive Director of BladeSports International, and Dan is the current World Champion. Both men have won many events in the past. Both are very open about the sport and techniques, as you can tell from their posts above. When these guys talk, I listen :thumbup:
 
Back
Top