- Joined
- Oct 2, 1998
- Messages
- 45,027
Elliott, such a joy to see that li'l sweety wrapping her new Papa around her pinkie toesshe has such an expressive presence in the photos :thumbup:
Thank you, kindly. :thumbup: She's a character, for sure.

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Elliott, such a joy to see that li'l sweety wrapping her new Papa around her pinkie toesshe has such an expressive presence in the photos :thumbup:
Jack, I found the same thing while touching up some vintage Winchester, Russell and Robeson blades from the 1920-1940 era. The blades took a wicked sharp edge with relatively little effort.
Good heat treat and fine grain structure, I suppose. Those blades were also run quite a bit softer on the Rockwell scale compared to many of today's @ 60 and above.
That's true Elliott. I guess that made more sense too.
Guess them silly old timers didn't know that they needed super steels at 65 Rc in order to get their daily chores done. Dagnabit!
![]()
Guess them silly old timers didn't know that they needed super steels at 65 Rc in order to get their daily chores done. Dagnabit!
![]()
This is a perfect application for a "like" button. Also, cargo pants. They are for soldiers and children.![]()
Regardless, I'm all for the "tradition" of grown men wearing actual long pants/trousers/not-shorts in most situations.
~ P.
Same here. The old Robeson I got recently from Invoice demonstrates the same characteristic - just a few licks brings it back to razor-sharp in a hurry!Jack, I found the same thing while touching up some vintage Winchester, Russell and Robeson blades from the 1920-1940 era. The blades took a wicked sharp edge with relatively little effort.
Good heat treat and fine grain structure, I suppose. Those blades were also run quite a bit softer on the Rockwell scale compared to many of today's @ 60 and above.
Heavens. I trust that's not pmew, dressed for a "special occasion."
~ P.
Also, cargo pants. They are for soldiers and children.
Fascinating pants discussion folks!
I'm with Elliott, and Sarah, on this. Shorts on grown men always make me think of Winston Smith's neighbour in George Orwell's 1984. When I was a boy, shorts were the dress code, sometimes to the age one left school! I got my first jeans at about 7, and caused a minor scandal by wearing long 'uns to school aged 10. Apart from sports, I've rarely worn shorts since. Consequently my legs have a pallor that would make a Glaswegian schemie blush!Having said that, there's a pic of me somewhere, in one of the old threads, in climbing breeches!
You need one of these Paul (the Combat Kilt!)
![]()
Combat kilt? Bugger that for a bunch of bananas!
I haven't worn blue jeans since I was in my 20s and never really wore slacks. Since I retired from the Army nearly a decade ago, I've worn cargo pants (mostly canvas), heavy duty work shirts, and light weight hiking boots almost exclusively. To work, to church, out on the town, and in the field. I doubt that'll change. See no reason to.Also, cargo pants. They are for soldiers and children.
I haven't worn blue jeans since I was in my 20s and never really wore slacks. Since I retired from the Army nearly a decade ago, I've worn cargo pants (mostly canvas), heavy duty work shirts, and light weight hiking boots almost exclusively. To work, to church, out on the town, and in the field. I doubt that'll change. See no reason to.