trimcut123
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Messages
- 3,107
CRK.. Good.. But not worth the money.. IMO
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I do feel bad that this thread started out being a bit of a rantHonestly I have tremendous respect for Chris Reeve. I think he is an incredible designer/artist. But he's producing objects and marketing them as user items and that is where I feel there is cognitive dissonance. I somehow feel he would be better suited to designing BMWs while letting the engineers deal with the performance aspects of the overall vehicle. In my OP I never once questioned the price of a Sebenza, I only mentioned price regarding the one piece line, and I still don't feel like it's asking too much for a $350 Project I to be made out of something like 3V. I'm sorry if I stepped on some toes but my OP was just a summary of thoughts that have been lurking in the back of my mind for some time now.
Still, could someone explain in which area a big Sebenza offers higher quality than a roughly half-price ZT 300 series knife? I don't see or feel a quality difference. Both offer awesome and tank-like build quality. I appreciate both knives, but I always thought that sebenzas are partly bought because of the hype, I can't see a rational explanation for paying the extra cash.
Still, could someone explain in which area a big Sebenza offers higher quality than a roughly half-price ZT 300 series knife? I don't see or feel a quality difference. Both offer awesome and tank-like build quality. I appreciate both knives, but I always thought that sebenzas are partly bought because of the hype, I can't see a rational explanation for paying the extra cash.
so is the basic conclusion that a CRK is like a Ferrari; wonderful to drive, but the 'haters' will say it's a $200k male enhancement product?![]()
I do not think CR may be compared to Ferrary - it's performance edge holding etc will be same as for any knife with same steel. Ferrary will go way faster then Toyota, but CR will not outcut let say Buck 110 Alaskan Guide with CPM S30V heat treated by Paul Boss.
Thanks, Vassili.
I do not think CR may be compared to Ferrary - it's performance edge holding etc will be same as for any knife with same steel. Ferrary will go way faster then Toyota, but CR will not outcut let say Buck 110 Alaskan Guide with CPM S30V heat treated by Paul Boss.
CR does not even provide special craftsmanship like for example W&H does. So in general difference is only price and with all listed questions - it is far from being Ferrary of knife world. It may be like Toyota vs Lexus.
What does look strange for me is that nobody really can clearly describe what is actually better. For ecample I can say why Microtech is more expensive - different more thought through mechanics like Bar-lock and really thin edge (which means more carefull HT). W&H has really good art work and superior steel - ZDP 189. Clear to understand what it is and why. But what CR message is?
I never hear same for CR - it is always - buy it for yourself if you can afford it and then you will see all the beauty etc, etc, etc. To me it indicates that for most it is only high price what is really important. So like message - "I am rich". I heard this actually many time - "You do hate CR because you can not afford it!" It seems to me that many CR "lovers" focused on this aspect most.
Thanks, Vassili.
Vassili, my friend,
Have yoiu ever compared the edge geometry of the Buck 110 and the CR folder? They will not cut the same even though the steel is the same.
The CR will be thicker at the edge than the WH but much thinner than the Buck.