The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I would pay the extra $20-30 for an CPM S30V upgrade. I really like their liner- less G-10 handles, like on the recon 1's.
If the knives were made in the US they would cost a lot more than they do now so going by what you said you wouldn't be using those either because they would cost too much.....
VG-10 isn't a high end steel at all and S30V isn't all that expensive either these days....
S30V is a nice mid range user steel, VG-10 is a budget steel like AUS-8 and N690.
My point being, if CS used some mid line Swedish steel, which is pretty cheap, but still very good, used G10 slabs, they could get the price to around $60 on the street for models with a 3-3.5 inch blade. Don't think so? Kershaw does it. The BIGGEST loss of money that I'd be willing to bet on is the conversion rate when buying the Japanese AUS8.
VG-10 is still rated in the lower rung of the high end steels.
I haven't really seen anyone compare AUS8 and VG-10 and state that they were in the same class.
They have a barong machete due out this year. Eneps are pretty similar to kukris, so for a company that doesn't specialize in machetes(ie, someone other than Condor/Imacasa), I can see why they might consider the various kurkis(2 plus the upcoming new one makes 3) good enough. A golok or parang would be a reasonable addition though...
CS isn't KAI, not even close as KAI is a HUGE Multinational company.
So now you know all of the inside information about CS, their profit margins etc so you can dictate how much a knife would cost in a steel they never used.........
Nope, VG-10 isn't a high end steel, never was supposed to be either so I am not sure were you are getting your information from, because you are dead wrong.....
Rated by who and compared to what steels..... The alloy content isn't there....
Maybe in someones fantasy world in their own mind VG-10 is a high end steel....
Really?
There was just a whole thread on that exact topic just a couple a weeks ago in General.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...vg10-vs-cold-steel-aus-8?highlight=VG-10+AUS8
I guess I see them as moving towards a focus on machetes, what with all of the machete-swords they've been coming out with. If they want to focus on that, fine, but then I think they should focus and offer more variety.
If they aren't interested in focusing on them, then I think they should back off and put more work into their knife line.
Well, I don't follow every forum post on here, like I said "I haven't seen it", not that "it didn't exist"
"ATS-34/154CM,VG-10, andS60V are the next group up. It's difficult to make generalizations about ATS-34 and 154-CM -- they are in such widespread use that heat treat varies widely. These steels provide a high-end performance benchmark"
http://zknives.com/knives/articles/knifesteelfaq.shtml
You did mention that "someone's fantasy world" thing. So while I am showing where I get my info, at least provide a link to something else regarding how close AUS8 is to VG-10.
Reason why, is I had a friend of mine who is a chef use a variety of knives (the test is still ongoing). The test was to use a knife for all the kitchen work you need (provided it is cutting tasks) for 1 day. the sharpness would be measured before and after. So far, the steels tested out in order VG-10, CTS-BD1, 14C28N, and AUS8. None of these steels did bad at all, just some did better than others. It would be a good idea that alloy content isn't everything. Yes, it means a lot, but the heat treatment means a lot as well.
In this way, we can say knives with (x steel) were ht'd to (y hardness) with (z method of ht). All are a factor. VG-10 is in the class of higher end steels, not that it is the best steel out there, but 20 years ago, it was high end. Today, there are much more advanced technologies whiich produce steels with much better qualities, but none of these change VG-10'scharacteristics. Also, if it were the user steel we are told and is AUS8 and VG-10 were so alike, price would reflect that.
VG-10 is in the class of higher end steels, not that it is the best steel out there, but 20 years ago, it was high end.
That's a pretty vague test with a ton of variables, and that's not even getting into the knives themselves and the variations of those....
The closest thing to VG-10 is Bohler N690 as in the steels are interchangeable.......
Yes HT and tempering are very important as are blade and edge geometry along with edge refinement and that's why the variables have to be cut down to a min to get any kind of valid result.
If the alloy content isn't there in the steels it just isn't there and nothing can change that fact and there just isn't any magic process that will change it....
As far as price goes the cost for the steel is in the same class for AUS-8, N690 and VG-10....
VG-10 is not a higher end steel, nor is AUS-8 and N690...
The information that you linked to isn't what you think it is and you are misunderstanding it because of that...
CPM 10V and CPM 15V have been around for a long time.... 30+ years (CPM 10V) and 23 years (CPM 15V)...... VG-10 is pot metal compared to those two steels.....
154CM has been around since 1972....... That's 41 years.....
That said the steels like VG-10 and AUS-8 are good steels, or I should say are still good steels just like steels like 440C, 420HC, 1095, D2 etc...
The real problem comes in when people start living in the past and want to believe they are more than they really are compared to the steels that are being used today, the gap is widening more each year in production knives while the steels in the CPM S30V class are for the most part standard today for mainstream production knives.
Again, no reference. Anyway, some companies advertise VG-10 as a "super steel". It isn't me saying that. I never mentioned AUS8 in that way, but, I would agree that it is a lower class steel. N690, I think it would be on the upper tier of mid steels.
Remember though, Bohler has their own patented powder metallurgy process too. I actually find it nice and refreshing that companies start trying things out of the norm. The thing I do like about Spyderco is that they do offer knives in various steel types (not that I'd buy them if it was a limited production piece), but it gives the knife enthusiasts something to investigate.
As far as my experiment goes, I realize there were lots of variables and there really isn't a need for this to be done in a lab, since the test can be redone anyway if needed. It was more out of my own amusement that anything.
It would still be nice to have CS get a slightly better steel with their blades. It would be great to see something combining the thinness of an endura (maybe not that thin), with a tri-ad lock, a mid- higher end steel, and some G10. To me, that would be my dream folder.
I like my old voyagers and MANY of the other CS product I own. But AUS-8A just doesn't do it for me anymore. Once you try S30v, M4, M390, super blue and other metals it is hard to go back.