Cold Steel VS Zero Tolerance

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not defending a troll. Whether it was the OPs intention to "troll" or not, those who took the opportunity to take cheap shots at things that have little to do with the knives themselves do not help to dissuade the trolls.

Rather than focusing on "troll", why not give a comprehensive explanation of why you think the OPs opinion is incorrect? Then you have a chance at actually influencing people's opinions, including those who aren't actively posting in the thread. If you hate Cold Steel so much, I commend that as long as you back up your feelings with carefully considered explanations.

However, the majority of the content in this thread, including your posts, have little to do with comparison of the knives themselves. No matter what the intentions of the OP were, the topic was made and its title is "Cold Steel VS Zero Tolerance". If you have something to say about it, now is your chance to make others either agree or disagree with you.

Do you think expressing your frustration with Cold Steel fanboys, to whom you refer with a very insulting tone, is going to make anyone think less of Cold Steel and better of ZT? If you think the knives suck and ZTs are better, then speak your mind.

You're not understanding why I'm posting here in the first place. I'm not PART of this discussion, I am only here to point out the fact that OP never intended for it to BE a discussion. That is all.

Never did I express the opinion that ZTs are better than cold steels. Only that the OP was wrong to start a troll thread ignorantly proclaiming that cold steels were better in the first place.
 
I have knives from both companies and the feel and quality of the zero tolerance felt twice as good as the cold steal (it also cost twice as much). I did have an issue with the lock up of my ZT. I noticed it would fail with light pressure. I also chipped the blade doing something with it I thought it could handle (I thought it was indestructible :)). I sent it in and they fixed the lock up and replaced the blade with no charge or questions asked. Now it locks up great. The cold steal now sits in my tool box and the ZT as been my EDC knife for the past several years. Both are great knives but you get what you pay for.
 
The OP talks about locks.

I use my knives in the woods. I cut wood for the fire and do carving for traps. Most of the times, I do it fast and in less than ideal conditions. Sometimes it is dark, sometimes the woods are dense and do not give you a lot of space, sometimes it is cold and rainy. I use fixed blades, but I have used a few folding knives as well. Cutting and preparing firewood puts strain on any knife, but with the proper technique, almost any decent knife can handle it. If you really need to do it fast, the cuts are not going to be perfectly vertical, and the blade will stick a little to the wood after biting it. You will have to use some force to remove it from the wood, I guess this is basic stuff to anyone that uses knives this way. Bulding wood traps takes carving, and this carving involves a lot of lateral stress to blade, as you have to carve up curves and notches. You use all kinds of different grips to do this work.

Some people would call this "hard use".

I have had a CS Lawman and I have handled a ZT566.

I don´t know about hard use, I really don´t. But for the stuff I do, the CS´ triad lock is clearly, obviously, glaringly superior to ZT´s frame locks. This has nothing to do with ZT´s execution. The triad lock is much more realiable, by design.

Actually, the Lawman offered a more positive grip, since it was a lot coarser than ZT´s. Of course, the CS woud also cut better than the ZT566, as its blade was thinner and FFG.

The ZT was prettier, though.
 
Krissig12 said:
And in the other situation, the cheap ass regular joes who just bought the knife because it was cheap, but heard it was decent quality, certainly wouldn't be heard whining about broken CS's on forums they weren't a part of. They would either just throw it away or contact CS directly about it.

Wow, that is some serious speculation right there.

So according to you, everyone has their own personal excuse not to talk about CS knives' failures, lock or otherwise.

The "cheap ass regular joes" would just throw the whole knife away or contact CS.

The "mall ninjas who've graduated from Budk" would never detect the various problems that the knives certainly have.

The "cheap asses" would just shrug it off if their CS knife fails because, in your words, CS knives don't have quite as much "money and prestige" behind them.

And I suppose the hundreds of regular forum members who own CS knives are all delusional and completely unwilling to report an easily defeated lock on what is probably the most hated production knife company around.

Seems like you covered all your bases! :thumbup:
 
Not in their couple of fixed blades, in comparison to Cold Steel's Japan made knives. Cold Steel's Japan made knives, in a word-flawless in both grind and fnf on the handles etc.

Some of us speak from experience, and some spot off with ill informed opinions.



Ohhhh okay, because you can find one knife that's better quality from cold steel compared to a ZT, that makes all my views invalid. You're right, Cold steel is definetly known for their excellent F&F, superb customer service, and great steels. I'll tell you those last couple of sentences were me being sarcastic (felt I needed to explain that because frankly you don't seem to be....fast shall I say?)


What I'm saying overall is ZT is known for what I previously stated, and the same with cold steel. It's what their company's are built on. disagree? Go look at their products.
 
Wow, that is some serious speculation right there.

So according to you, everyone has their own personal excuse not to talk about CS knives' failures, lock or otherwise.

The "cheap ass regular joes" would just throw the whole knife away or contact CS.

The "mall ninjas who've graduated from Budk" would never use their knife hard enough to detect the various problems that the knives certainly have.

The "cheap asses" would just shrug it off if their CS knife fails because, in your words, CS knives don't have quite as much "money and prestige" behind them.

And I suppose the hundreds of regular forum members who own CS knives are all delusional and completely unwilling to report an easily defeated lock on what is probably the most hated production knife company around.

Seems like you covered all your bases! :thumbup:

You still aren't getting it.

I explicitly stated that regardless of whether my speculations were true or not, I wasn't saying that there were in fact cold steels breaking. Just that it was a possibility that you couldn't completely rule out. My speculation was only in fleshing out WHY that might be the case.

But that was all a side track. It just looked a lot more prominent in text. The end of each of the two posts I made went a little like this; "I don't even care if they aren't breaking. I still don't need or want them, and the fanboys are wrong to suggest that everyone should"
 
Perhaps the thing that most turns me off from CS (other than not making almost anything in the USA) is the quasi-religious devotion their followers seem to have for the CS brand and it's designers. How often does the ZT crowd speak about "the will of Hinderer" or say things like "Ken Onion didn't like straight blades, so he created a superior line of recurves instead"?

Am guess I am a heretic for not believing in the Supremacy of Demko, AUS8 steel, the TRIAD lock, and Taiwanese manufacturing.

Well as I said, that's his stated aim. For a long time the tagline for Cold Steel was "the world's strongest, sharpest, knives". Since I'm a terrible mindreader I just have to take the man at his word.

Even critics of the Cold Steel fanboyism in this thread have acknowledged that the Tri-Ad lock is exceptionally strong, even if they dispute the necessity of a lock that strong. Andrew Demko is a very clever knife designer, although of course there are many clever knife designers. Taiwanese manufacturing allows Cold Steel to sell good quality products at much lower prices than they'd have to charge if they produced in the US. Any manufacturer can have defects and failures, regardless of where their knife is made. AUS8 was an adequate steel that kept them in business until they started switching to the Carpenter steels they're offering now.

I don't know about "supremacy", but a very good product at a very good price? Yes. Enough silliness to appeal to the big kid still alive in most people? Also yes.
 
Last edited:
And before you whine about how there's more than one cold steel with superior build quality to a ZT, I'll tell you I meant that the majority of cold steels have inferior build-quality. There's probably a few cold steels with better build-quality, but they're in the minority and aren't like the bulk of the CS line.
 
Ohhhh okay, because you can find one knife that's better quality from cold steel compared to a ZT, that makes all my views invalid. You're right, Cold steel is definetly known for their excellent F&F, superb customer service, and great steels. I'll tell you those last couple of sentences were me being sarcastic (felt I needed to explain that because frankly you don't seem to be....fast shall I say?)


What I'm saying overall is ZT is known for what I previously stated, and the same with cold steel. It's what their company's are built on. disagree? Go look at their products.

They have an expansive line of Japan made knives
 
You still aren't getting it.

I explicitly stated that regardless of whether my speculations were true or not, I wasn't saying that there were in fact cold steels breaking. Just that it was a possibility that you couldn't completely rule out. My speculation was only in fleshing out WHY that might be the case.

But that was all a side track. It just looked a lot more prominent in text. The end of each of the two posts I made went a little like this; "I don't even care if they aren't breaking. I still don't need or want them, and the fanboys are wrong to suggest that everyone should"

Okay, I apologize. Locks breaking from abuse aren't really what I have in mind, though, because Triad locks will eventually break. I'm talking about inappropriately easy disengagement of the lock due to hand pressure, light taps, gentle prying or the knife twisting in the hand. As far as I can tell and from the absence of any reports of it occurring, this sort of inappropriate disengagement does not happen on Triad locks.
 
Okay, I apologize. Locks breaking from abuse aren't really what I have in mind, though, because Triad locks will eventually break. I'm talking about inappropriately easy disengagement of the lock due to hand pressure, light taps, gentle prying or the knife twisting in the hand. As far as I can tell and from the absence of any reports of it occurring, this sort of inappropriate disengagement does not happen on Triad locks.

Fair enough, I can't argue with that.

However, in my own experience I haven't seen enough of it happen with well built frame locks to condemn them either. Perhaps one day I'll regret trusting them. But until then I'll just keep using them hard:)
 
You can't seriously think a triad lock is the fastest and easiest to use of the locks you mentioned? A triad lock easier to manipulate than an axis? Really??

I have both.

The triad does not require me to put my thumb across the blade path while pushing the blade closed like a liner or frame lock.

I've been cut by a b
lock failure on both a liner lock and frame lock. I've had examples of both close with the slightest bump on the spine. Not spine wacks, because I don't do that. Just slight negative pressure will slip a lot of liner locks and frame locks.


The axis lock/ ultra locks are plenty strong, and do well with jarring or negative pressure.

They have a bit of an issue legally (LEO's can treat them like gravity knives because they are easy to flip open).

Closing the triad takes no more thought or effort than unclicking a seat belt, or open a pop tab, or flipping a light switch to me.

But I have to admit, my 9 year old does struggle, and he can close the axis lock pretty easy.

So I guess if I had a finger pinch force-o-meter I guess I could measure it and compare it with the finger-slide-o meter for the ultra lock/axis lock pinchie-slide action to close that knife.

I do just really like the triad. If I could get the lock in other brands, I sure would!


On a side note, the problem Demko points out with the liner lock is one I have had with several makes with liner locks, and seen in more than one frame lock.

Bumping or negative pressure on the spine is no good. I've been cut by more than one brand while making awkward cuts in tight spaces before. I've seen it happen to others, and seen a liner lock fail, with just a little negative pressure cutting rubber sidewall on a tire necessitate a trip to the emergency and follow up surgery.
 
Last edited:

Nobody knows what anyone else is thinking. That includes not know why the OP posted what he did.
Nobody is in a position to say how informed someone else is.

Do not insult or I will infract.
 
Too many posts and too few pictures. Who needs a lock anyway????

P1000849.JPG


This one gets some hard use by opening beer bottles.
 
Well as I said, that's his stated aim. For a long time the tagline for Cold Steel was "the world's strongest, sharpest, knives". Since I'm a terrible mindreader I just have to take the man at his word.

Even critics of the Cold Steel fanboyism in this thread have acknowledged that the Tri-Ad lock is exceptionally strong, even if they dispute the necessity of a lock that strong. Andrew Demko is a very clever knife designer, although of course there are many clever knife designers. Taiwanese manufacturing allows Cold Steel to sell good quality products at much lower prices than they'd have to charge if they produced in the US. Any manufacturer can have defects and failures, regardless of where their knife is made. AUS8 was an adequate steel that kept them in business until they started switching to the Carpenter steels they're offering now.

I don't know about "supremacy", but a very good product at a very good price? Yes. Enough silliness to appeal to big kid still alive in most people? Also yes.
Well said.
 
LEOs don't treat axis locks as gravity knives.. I don't see how they're even remotely close to a gravity knife. You have to really make a swooping action to have it come out.
 
You might want to rephase that. You made me LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top