Well ok, if you really want to beat that dead horse instead of walking away from the stink, I'll be happy to mash it to as fine a point as you want to go with it.
Yes, it must've been an error.
How you feel and what actually transpired can often be different things. It looks like he was being helpful from here.
Yes, and the key thing to remember is that it's all dependent on
point of view. From my point of view, what "actually" happened is that I actually felt like I was actually being talked to like a child. Whether that was that moderator's intent, neither of us can say. And even if he did say, nobody except him would ever know if what he
says is the truth or not.
From your point of view, you see him being helpful.
So you are correct: how you feel (that he was being helpful) and what actually transpired (from my point of view, that I was talked down to) are two different things.
Then why bring it up here in this totally unrelated thread?
It wasn't totally unrelated, if you go back and review the context in which I mentioned it. I was mentioning an anecdote in support of another member's statement regarding the malfunction of the recent posts search. It was a story, not a complaint.
Oh, but perhaps we can say that from your point of view, you saw it was a complaint, even though I've said I didn't mean it as such. Just as, so you say, the moderator meant no insult to me, yet that's how I saw it.
Hmm...funny how that perception thing works, isn't it?
So, are we done yet? Or is he not pulped enough yet?
It's interesting to me that if two members were bickering so far off the topic of a thread, someone with a title like your would've been in here with a warning to stop. But when someone with a title like yours is involved, it's perpetuated. Very interesting indeed.