Enlan is going to make some Fix Blade

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why hasnt anyone patent a design of a knife that have a one sided cutting edge? He could make plently sueing everyone else.
 
Taking design similarities out of the conversation.

How have we gotten to a point where the location of where a hole is drilled is grounds for legal action?

Yes. It's a trademark and not a patent. You see the little hole, and you're supposed to be able to identify the knife as a Busse brand knife -- just like if you see 2 little circles on top of a bigger one, you think Disney. It's a registered trademark, but without distribution in the US that the Busse company could enjoin, they'd have to enforce in China. Not an easy or inexpensive course of action.
 
Alright, I'll bite - why? It's not like the heat treatments for D2 are a closely guarded secret.

The heat treatments designed for D2 maximize wear resistance, and compressive strength not toughness. Second its just not a tough steel, its impact resistance is 20ft-lbs. It just not a great steel to make a busse clone out of if you're not busse.
 
The Kershaw Outcast is D2, I've read a lot of good about it. I like the blade shape, I mean to grab one myself just to see how it performs as a chopper.
 
Taking design similarities out of the conversation.

How have we gotten to a point where the location of where a hole is drilled is grounds for legal action?
It's an identity issue. Spyderco is identified by nothing so much as the opening hole, and this is analogous to the Busse talon hole. It's a design feature that distinguishes Busse knives from all others.
 
Yeah I understand the theory but that doesn't stop it from being ridiculous. I think IP law like this and process patents like the "Amazon One Click" one have gone too far.
 
The Busse talon hole is quite unique. It sits near the choil, not at the end of the blade.

Ah yes, my bad, I now see which hole you were referring to.
I thought I had seen these before as well, and indeed after a quick google, here are the Extrema Ratio Fulcrum C and Shrapnel OG fixed blades:
EXTREMA%20RATIO%20SCHRAPNEL%20TESTUDO.JPG

EXTREMA%20RATIO%20FULCRUM%20C%20TESTUDO.JPG

Extrema Ratio isn't exactly a brand that people accuse of being copycats.

I think IP law like this and process patents like the "Amazon One Click" one have gone too far.
I also agree that this is going too far.
 
Last edited:
It's not just the hole. Those designs are total rip-offs of busse. I guess they are not creative enough to design their own knives so they have to find a reputable company to steal from.
 
Ah yes, my bad, I now see which hole you were referring to.
I thought I had seen these before as well, and indeed after a quick google, here are the Extrema Ratio Fulcrum C and Shrapnel OG fixed blades:
EXTREMA%20RATIO%20SCHRAPNEL%20TESTUDO.JPG

EXTREMA%20RATIO%20FULCRUM%20C%20TESTUDO.JPG

Extrema Ratio isn't exactly a brand that people accuse of being copycats.


I also agree that this is going too far.

Looks like the Extrema Ratio hole is on the guard itself. The Busse mark is for a hole in the "rearward portion of the blade". It may seem like a minor difference, but trademarks can turn on technical distinctions like that.

This is a record of the mark:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4009:kota7o.2.18
 
Last edited:
I have a CS magnum khukri that is made in Taiwan I think. It cost me all of $23 shipped. It's handled everything I've used it for, and I believe it did very well in destruction tests. If these Enlan fixed blades will offer that kind of performance for the same price, I'm definitely getting a few. How badly can it fare compared to other low-priced knives?

A lot of people need to get off their high horses here about copying a design. It just shows that Busse's designs are widely regarded as ones that work, and at the same time aesthetically appealing. A knife is a fairly simple tool, and while there are many ways to present a way to cut, simplicity is the best approach. How many effective and simple knife designs are out there? I see a lot of people making knives based on Loveless' designs, but I don't see anyone complaining. It's a design that works and looks great.
 
I have a CS magnum khukri that is made in Taiwan I think. It cost me all of $23 shipped. It's handled everything I've used it for, and I believe it did very well in destruction tests. If these Enlan fixed blades will offer that kind of performance for the same price, I'm definitely getting a few. How badly can it fare compared to other low-priced knives?

A lot of people need to get off their high horses here about copying a design. It just shows that Busse's designs are widely regarded as ones that work, and at the same time aesthetically appealing. A knife is a fairly simple tool, and while there are many ways to present a way to cut, simplicity is the best approach. How many effective and simple knife designs are out there? I see a lot of people making knives based on Loveless' designs, but I don't see anyone complaining. It's a design that works and looks great.

I agree with you about similar designs being no big deal. Lots of knives look like lots of other knives. But if you knowingly use another company's trademark, that's like putting the original company's name or logo on your product. That goes past imitation and is more like marketing counterfeits. Whether you want to monitor and self-enforce Mr. Busse's trademarks for him is a personal matter. It kind of bothers me, but I'm not sure enough to make me not buy a trademark-infringing Enlan if one is ever actually marketed (if I wanted a fixed blade, which I don't).
 
I have a CS magnum khukri that is made in Taiwan I think. It cost me all of $23 shipped. It's handled everything I've used it for, and I believe it did very well in destruction tests. If these Enlan fixed blades will offer that kind of performance for the same price, I'm definitely getting a few. How badly can it fare compared to other low-priced knives?

The CS machetes are made in south africa, they use 1055 not D2. I would not expect similar performance.
 
I'm pretty sure Enlan could make exact copies of Busse (busse name printed on them and everything) knives in 8cr13mov steel sell them for $40 and people here who know what Busse's are would buy and defend Enlan with things like "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, or Busse designs work, Enlan using them is a compliment". No reason to argue/debate, neither will change their minds. Just like the kids in school who will cheat on a test when given a chance and those who won't when given a chance. Those who do will argue it doesn't hurt anybody, those who don't will say its wrong.
 
This. It seems that most (all?) Chinese companies don't care about copyrights or patents. Personally I don't even see the point of the talon hole, so it seems like the only reason they copied it was to make Busse-looking knives.



I'd be surprised if it offered 10% :thumbdn:

Do you buy Benchmade? It is my understanding that they ripped off Spyderco's hole.
 
Last edited:
Since I already have a Sanrenmu 710, the poor mans Sebenza..I would be also proud to carry this Enlan, the poor mans Busse..A lot of us on this forum have thein wallets and can't afford expensive blades..Knives all seem to look about the same to me and every maker ripped off someone..People love to steal others ideas. No thought exists in a vacuum...Everything is based on something else.
 
Since I already have a Sanrenmu 710, the poor mans Sebenza..I would be also proud to carry this Enlan, the poor mans Busse..A lot of us on this forum have thein wallets and can't afford expensive blades..Knives all seem to look about the same to me and every maker ripped off someone..People love to steal others ideas. No thought exists in a vacuum...Everything is based on something else.

Orly? So the words "intellectual property" mean absolutely nothing? Let me get this straight - you're saying that it's perfectly acceptable to blatantly rip off someone else's trademarked or patented idea/product and profit from it?
 
Orly? So the words "intellectual property" mean absolutely nothing? Let me get this straight - you're saying that it's perfectly acceptable to blatantly rip off someone else's trademarked or patented idea/product and profit from it?

+:thumbup: I really wish people would stop buying these rip offs and try to save up for something that's made by a reputable company. I think they would be surprised.
 
Yes, let's do nothing but speculate on what knives those LOOK like. If they are not marketed to be a generic version of the knife it is supposedly a rip-off of, then they are not a rip-off of said knife. PEOPLE tie the "looks like" tag on, not the company. Now, you cannot make a knife that is completely 100% original. Just like with movies and tv shows. If the knife performs good at a good price point, then buy it. If it does not, don't buy it. Don't turn this into a "made in China PoS" match, like every single thread about SRM or Enlan becomes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top