I have been watching from the sidelines on this discussion because I am really torn here. As much of a fan I am of S! knives and the people who make them, there have been some very valid points made by all sides of the situation. It is my hope that S!K takes some of the legal points that were brought up here and elsewhere to heart, and that they make sure that they are in conformance of the law with every knife offered and with every order placed.
The pre-sale argument is an old one, and there have been critics of this from the beginning from a business model standpoint. I placed each of my pre-sale orders knowing what the situation was regarding delivery time. My next pre sale coming my way is the 4.1, which should be out before the end of the year. Then I have a 6 and an 8 on order. All three of these preorder knives have been on order for over a year now (over 13 months to be precise), and it will likely be over two years before the GSO 8 arrives. But I understood this situation when ordering these knives, and I did this to help get S!K off the ground and running.
Ellie has done what she had to do from a marketing standpoint with her post here, and I am glad that she posted. I just hope that S!K can take care of all of their business practices and website so that they are always in compliance with the law. I have no evidence that they have not been in compliance, and I am not a lawyer. But all of us who have knives on pre-order have a vested interest in the success of S!K. Whenever lawyers get involved, everybody looses.