Imitation is...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jim, I don't have an issue with Ron copying my design, as the thread you referenced purpose was my asking for design ideas.
Many forum members contributed initially and Kyle and I refined the design.

My issue is with Ron copying the knife without asking Kyle.

Then you probably shouldn't have brought it up. This entire discussion about the Newton and the Royer should have taken place and been kept confidential between the two makers, IMHO. Others may disagree, but the collector who designs something that contains lots of typical design elements, put together to become a whole, has no business getting between the two makers and, basically, outting what appears to be a personal grievance so publicly, in a forum such as this.
 
So what?
The only thing lost in this copy is whatever ego boost and street cred the owner gets for owning an absolutely unique piece.

If not for the desire of the uniqueness of custom knives, many custom knife collectors would probably just collect factory knives. Not a good thing for the custom knife community.

I bet the resale value of the "original" went up.

If the resale value was my only concern, I would have sold it and Ron would not have gotten the opportunity to copy it.
 
Last edited:
Then you probably shouldn't have brought it up. This entire discussion about the Newton and the Royer should have taken place and been kept confidential between the two makers, IMHO. Others may disagree, but the collector who designs something that contains lots of typical design elements, put together to become a whole, has no business getting between the two makers and, basically, outting what appears to be a personal grievance so publicly, in a forum such as this.

You obviously didn't read my previous post.
I kept this private for about a year and a half, only posted both photos after Lorien starting this thread as I felt this offered a good example and was good productive discussion for collectors to be part of.
I told Paul on the phone a week or so ago that I wasn't interested in giving any details on the subject on the forum. Until this evening, I had only posted the two knives, that Ron had not asked permission and the dates each were made. After Paul's post this afternoon I felt a reply with more details was justified.

I don't understand how you figure this should have been kept between makers. It was a knife I help design, commissioned, paid for, and was first approached by the purveyor.
 
You obviously didn't read my previous post.
I kept this private for about a year and a half, only posted both photos after Lorien starting this thread as I felt this offered a good example and was good productive discussion for collectors to be part of.
I told Paul on the phone a week or so ago that I wasn't interested in giving any details on the subject on the forum. Until this evening, I had only posted the two knives, that Ron had not asked permission and the dates each were made. After Paul's post this afternoon I felt a reply with more details was justified.

I don't understand how you figure this should have been kept between makers. It was a knife I help design, commissioned, paid for, and was first approached by the purveyor.

I read the entire thread throughout it's development and didn't miss a bit of it. To me, at least, your message sounded more like a disgruntled collector, airing a petty grievance. Sorry, just seems that way to me.
 
I read the entire thread throughout it's development and didn't miss a bit of it. To me, at least, your message sounded more like a disgruntled collector, airing a petty grievance. Sorry, just seems that way to me.

No, not a petty grievance, I just don't think it was right.
I actually pointed the purveyor to Kyle so as he could possibly make the purveyor's client a 'similar' bowie.

Makers learning from, being inspired and influenced by other makers is a productive thing.
Makers creating "close as possible copies" of other maker's specific knives for profit is not a good thing for custom knives IMO.
 
I kept this private for about a year and a half, only posted both photos after Lorien starting this thread as I felt this offered a good example and was good productive discussion for collectors to be part of.

Hey! Don't drag me into this!:D

I totally see where Kevin's coming from. And I'm glad this came up here because it is a perfect case study in one aspect of what this thread was intended to address, albeit unexpected.

We're all grown men we can agree to disagree as we have so many times in the past, and continue an interesting and cogent discussion, without getting gummed up in drama.
 
I read the entire thread throughout it's development and didn't miss a bit of it. To me, at least, your message sounded more like a disgruntled collector, airing a petty grievance. Sorry, just seems that way to me.

I think I agree with that assessment

First Paul, let me repeat part of what I told you on the phone the other weekend. I had no interest getting into this in any detail on a forum, however since you and Ron opened the door with your above post, then so be it. I assume you are acting as Ron's spokesperson, since you state details that you couldn't know without him telling you.

*****First, let me correct you. I am not, nor have I been speaking for Ron. I would not, however blame him for staying out of this fray. (He just had his shoes shined, if you get my meaning)

I came upon Ron's Ring Bowie by accident while browsing Chuck Ward's photo site one Sunday afternoon almost a year and a haft ago. I believe only a few saw the photos as they were quickly taken down.

*****Funny how "accidents" happen, no?

I was a little angry at first because I thought (with Ron and Kyle being good friends) Kyle had giving Ron permission to make that close a copy. I contacted Kyle and found he knew nothing of the copy. Kyle contacted Ron, and I will just say they had a discussion.

*****Yeah, seeking permission is big with you. I noticed NOT that you were very careful to clear the use of my style and pattern for the sheath Kyle made for your knife. Now it has been know by all for a long time that I don't care and, in fact, encourage new makers to use my style, but since permission is so very important to you, I thought sure you'd "at least" ask me if it was okay.

After again speaking to Kyle I cooled off and just figured I would drop it or probably mention it to Ron if I saw him at a show. I was actually going to ask him about it at the past Blade Show but I was so sick the entire time I didn't feel like talking much at all.

******Yes, personal face to face confrontation will cause one to feel ill.

I pretty much kept it to myself (only telling 3 friends) until I opened this thread of Lorien's a couple weeks ago. I thought, why not post up both knives? It was a great example of what Lauren was addressing.

A LITTLE of the background:
About two years ago a purveyor contacted me as he had a client who was very interested in the Bowie. I suggested he contact Kyle about possibly making a similar one. Kyle wouldn't make a copy so the purveyor went to Ron who agreed to for ALOT of $$$$$.

Now Paul let's discuss the differences you and Ron point out:



Incorrect Paul, as you can clearly see in the photo below that Ron's has a ring guard and a separate shell guard just as Kyle's does. I do applaud Ron for the cool sheath carry strap for the extra guard. His only original idea.

*****I guess this further proves, I'm not speaking for Ron. If so I would have known there were two guards. I do know his ring is not integral and therefore removable……and yes, Ron does have my permission,as a previous student in my shop to use any of my "designs" and/or techniques freely at will.




Based on the inaccuracy of your first difference, I would need to see how the frame is different.

*****Perfectly possible, but the travel expense is on you;)



That's the only 'substantial' difference I concede too.



Now that's picking nits.

*****This coming from a nit picking champion.:thumbup:



Sufficiently different? I would say pretty close for one maker duplicating another's billet without their input.

*****Yep, sufficiently different as would be expected.

I would like to know how long it took him to find a piece of mammoth that matches that closely.

*****Yours is from the left tusk, his is from the right



You're really stretching it Paul.

*****Take another look. one is a vine pattern, the other is notches.

All, I'm saying is just maybe Ron should have asked his friend first before copying his knife to this degree.
And second, with Ron's tremendous ability and creativity, why would he copy another's knife to this degree?

******Because he was asked to and more, because he could.

One of the things that has surprised me most in this thread is how many condone this practice of copying a specific knife from another maker for monetary gain without asking.
And I don't care what anyone says, it's not the same as making a Loveless or Moran style knife.
*****Speaking of things that surprise. It really surprises me how a thread like this has has the potential to damage and destroy friendships and create rifts that may never heal

Jim, I don't have an issue with Ron copying my design, as the thread you referenced purpose was my asking for design ideas.
Many forum members contributed initially and Kyle and I refined the design.

*****Oh, I must have mis interpreted the early post by you in this thread.

My issue is with Ron copying the knife without asking Kyle.

*****I addressed this copy without permission earlier in my response

I sincerely hope this can be my final word in this thread.

Paul
 
Last edited:
I hope this is not construed as beating a dead horse, but I think the photo below is pertinent and germane to the subject at hand. I am still not speaking for Ron although I did ask his permission to share the photo with you.

This photo is of a design concept which was done as you can see in July 1997 (7-1997)

Now I truly do rest my case if you will let me, Kevin.

Paul
 
Last edited:
Ecclesiastes 1:9 "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."
 
Ecclesiastes 1:9 "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."

Garsson 1:66 "Bullcrap"!

New stuff is made all the time....Loveless subhilt, microwave, i-phone.

Homage is cool, accepted and appreciated by many.

Imitation can be thievery.

The IKBS system is free for all to use, all Flavio asks is that you call it that, and mark it as such.....to take a bearing race system adapted to a knife pivot region and call in uniquely your own, and try to patent it? That is wrong, imo....and insult to IKBS. I DON'T know of examples where this happened, but it makes the point that like art,one may not KNOW what an exact copy is from an engineering or artistic perspective, but you can still tell when something is a copy from an overall perspective.

If someone originated or appears to have originated something, it sure would be nice and DECENT to let them know you are gonna copy them.

Make sense?

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
they say there is nothing new beneath the sun, and perhaps they are right.

If you have ripped off someone else's design, you are quite likely a thief, and a thief always knows he is a thief.
If you are inspired by the work of others, such that characteristics of their work imbue yours, that's borrowing.
It is always morally correct to ask before you borrow something, but if you don't that's not necessarily the same as stealing.

I could probably have said that better, I hope you caught my drift.

What the hell, Branson! I already used that saying, and in my own unique way, and no credit from you! Thanks a lot.
 
Sorry.. I've been reading this over the last few days.
Take my copying you as a compliment Lorien...ha

I have a question though, and forgive me if it's been mentioned, but I have copied Paul Long's sheaths for years and I don't think I ever overtly asked permission but took his help as implicit permission; sorry Paul.

But since he put out videos that I bought, does that imply permission even if I use the techniques for my own profit?
I don't mean just in Paul's case but in the case of anyone putting out how to videos.
 
Last edited:
flattery will get you anywhere
 
I have a question though, and forgive me if it's been mentioned, but I have copied Paul Long's sheaths for years and I don't think I ever overtly asked permission but took his help as implicit permission; sorry Paul.

But since he put out videos that I bought, does that imply permission even if I use the techniques for my own profit?
I don't mean just in Paul's case but in the case of anyone putting out how to videos.

Stuart, you or anyone I have talked to, exchanged emails with, or taught face to face, or who have obtained the DVDs have my full permission and blessing to use anything I do that you think is to your advantage at any time you like. Giving me credit, if that is your desire is always welcome and strokes the ego immensely, but I won't pout if it is forgotten.

I was just discussing my "Legacy" with STeven a few moments ago. I think my highest and best legacy would be to leave as many as possible behind me who can do what I do at least as well. I believe that is only possible by helping freely.

Paul
 
Giving me credit, if that is your desire is always welcome and strokes the ego immensely, but I won't pout if it is forgotten.

I was just discussing my "Legacy" with STeven a few moments ago. I think my highest and best legacy would be to leave as many as possible behind me who can do what I do at least as well. I believe that is only possible by helping freely.
Paul

Paul and I disagree on this, but he is patently more giving to fellow man than I am.

IF you give away all your secrets, especially hard won knowledge, what is the point of even striving for excellence?

I mean....I'm not looking for good, very good or superb custom knives as a given rule.....I am searching for the BEST custom knives, by just about any measure, except stupid high prices.

As an example, I would LOVE a Wolfe Loerchner knife, but the $20,000.00++ price tag is a deterrent....and will be for the foreseeable future.

The cost difference between a Paul Long sheath and other great leather smiths is about 50%.....and that troubles me not at all....TO ME....you have a Paul Long sheath.....and you have the others.

There is always room for an opinion on this issue, but this is mine.....originality is to be applauded, accepted and RESPECTED.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
Paul and I disagree on this, but he is patently more giving to fellow man than I am.

IF you give away all your secrets, especially hard won knowledge, what is the point of even striving for excellence?

I just blab whatever I know.. which is precious little...and the world is dumber for me having said it;)
Really though, some styles can overlap, especially when you work as close as Ron and Kyle have. If Ron had the idea on paper before Kyle happened to build almost the same knife, I can see why Ron wouldn't think much of making the knife. Maybe just a misunderstanding that could easily be cleared up...we are human after all.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top