But to defend them?

I'm not defending the practice of flipping. I'm opposing the creation of a social shaming schema where members are called out by name with no clear, agreed-upon, non-arbitrary definition for flipping; no way to disprove allegations, and no recourse for being smeared.
Phixt said:
Please everyone understand what knife flipping is before posing questions with arbitrary tangents. And enjoy your "Butt hurt"
hump day.
We don't understand what knife flipping is. Shiny Edges posted a potential definition, but A) he's the only one who has accepted it and B) it's arbitrary.
We all know that there are people who are clearly buying knives for the express intent of reselling them at a profit. But how do you know they're buying and reselling for the purpose of making a profit, versus A) buying and reselling because they didn't like the knife quite as much as they thought they did? B) Buying and reselling because of a sudden financial crunch? C) Buying and selling because of buyer's remorse?
We can say that people who are flipping knives are dealers. But what about a guy who saw an opportunity to get a popular knife at below-market rates and jumped on it to resell? Does doing this once make you a dealer? Or just lucky?
I think if you wanted to really address the flipping issue, such as it is, you could do several things:
1. Have dealers limit quantity of sales per household.
2. Limit the number of sales threads you can post by level of membership. You could make this flexible by offering, say, ten sales threads a year for Gold members, 25 for Platinum, and allowing purchase of sales threads individually or in five-thread packages.
3. Clarify the definition of flipping and establish a forum rule, enforced by reporting and moderation. I.E., no resale of multiples of the same knife within 30 days of its release.