The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
For Christians: Don't cast your pearls before swine (Matt 7:6)
I consider Jesus to be a person that actually lived, not a fictional character in one of the most best-selling novels of all time. But if Jesus was God, he couldn't be a person, because every god is something that people invented to explain things they couldn't explain at the time. I believe that every time people start to listen to what is written in a book too much, they will develop backwards.
![]()
Please don't tell me I'm going to hell![]()
The problem with discussing someone else's religion from the outside is that religions tend to be complex and self-contradictory, going by the documents, the sects, the development over time.
What exactly is the religion itself? What is the center of it, from which the rest is just spin-off? It is easy enough to pick a particular aspect you don't like, proclaim that the religion itself, and then dismiss it.
Why do so many here who dismiss it, do so arrogantly or antagonistically? Why the overreaction?
As a counter-example, I would suggest that what R.H.Clark has been describing is a reliance on basic principles, without worrying about theological niceties or doctrinal definitions. It's like knife-making -- make a blade, put a handle on it, do it again and again and you get a feel for how to do it really well. It may help to read a few books or watch other good knifemakers in action, but reading and watching isn't knifemaking. Get out there and do it.
Millions of people speak of their adherence to this religion or that, and few bother to think how their personal understanding matches their fellow believers. Worse, they speak of other people's religions, with no experience of those people's behavior. Religion is a way of life that derives from ancient sources, constantly understood in new ways. Flippant disrespect only shows your own lack of experience, and does not invalidate others' beliefs.
Why should they be different?They seem to be following the rules of man rather than the rules of God.
Yes, if you believe that......wouldn't that indeed be good news?
Ask yourself this: If God was willing to come to earth as a baby and die an excruciating death for the sole purpose to save you from his sovereignty because he loves you, wouldn't that indeed be good news?
No one knows for sure as it can't be proven. Neither can it be empirically proven for any of the other deities from any religion that was ever conceived. That is all.
Exactly! Most religions do not try to PROVE that they are right. In my experience, it is Christians seems to spend the most time defending their religion. Why is that? A religion is a belief system. You either believe or you don't. That seems pretty simple to me.
Maybe because Christianity is the most popular religion in the world?
Shouldn't that be reason NOT to have such a need to prove it?
Especially considering that Christianity puts such a high value on faith.
It's about faith people, not proof.
If you want to prove the existence of God, well, no one's been able to do that in the entire existence of the race, so I severely doubt that someone on this forum is about to.![]()
Alot of arrogance in that passage.
Arrogant folks thinking they have "The Way".
And the wondrous reference to everyone else as swine.
Classy.
I'd go ya one better; no one in the entire existence of the PLANET has ever provided evidence of anything supernatural.
Andy
Shouldn't that be reason NOT to have such a need to prove it?
Especially considering that Christianity puts such a high value on faith.
It's about faith people, not proof.
If you want to prove the existence of God, well, no one's been able to do that in the entire existence of the race, so I severely doubt that someone on this forum is about to.![]()
How about this; Don't cast your Buster Warenskie "Jewel of the Orient" knife before a guy who's trying to pry a hubcap off of his car.
All I am implying is that more people = more talking. People in a predominantly ______ (insert with any religion) country will most likely hear people defending that religion especially if that religion is the most popular in said country.
All I am implying is that more people = more talking. People in a predominantly ______ (insert with any religion) will most likely hear people defending that religion.
Perhaps.
But why the need for proof?
Proof which cannot be had, and that the religion itself says is unnecessary?
I don't know either, fellow Andrew. I'm just guessing. The way you put it, religion sounds like hard work. Maybe that's why I don't care for it!I don't know about that. Christianity has, for a very long time, incorporated an element of persecution, whether real or imaginary, into the religion. They often like to portray themselves as being persecuted, by society, other religions, the government, etc. It's been that way for a very long time. What I find quite irritating is that Christians seem unable to stand it if they can't inject their religion into EVERY activity, and if that isn't allowed, they claim persecution.
Andy