kirk69

Just checked and he did the same to Bill Siegle after backing out of a deal.. I have faith that Spark will deal appropriately with this troll. :thumbup:
 
Looks like Jaxx spoke much too soon.

It appears that everyone was taking it way too easy on this individual.:mad:

Messing with someones feedback should be a bannable offense, if it isn't already...
 
GregS said:
Looks like Jaxx spoke much too soon.

It appears that everyone was taking it way too easy on this individual.:mad:

Messing with someones feedback should be a bannable offense, if it isn't already...
Click to expand...
Seems that I did... :grumpy: And on 2 sub-forums at that. Well whatever bashing he gets now, he gets alone and because of his latest actions, it may be a cold day in hell before I stick my neck out for another unknown/unproven member again.

Not a smart move, kirk69 and thanx for letting down the few of us who thought you deserved a little mercy in hopes that you'd redeem yourself here. :thumbdn:

...I guess that I should have known better. :(
 
All he has done was prove that he has no honor and doesn't belong here any longer. He has killed any chance at redemption in my eyes. Just another little lieing troll. He is one of those folks who seems to expect "another chance" after every infraction and it immediately becomes someone else's fault when he causes problems. I wonder why he waited almost two weeks before trying this?
 
No worries Jaxx. I think most know where you were coming from. :thumbup:

For every lowlife troll like this one, there are easily another thousand great members that start off.
 
ColdOne said:
No worries Jaxx. I think most know where you were coming from. :thumbup:

For every lowlife troll like this one, there are easily another thousand great members that start off.
Click to expand...

Jaxx,
At least you gave him the benifit (I would not have). And I understand also where you were coming from.

Looks like his feedback just got worse;)
 
Apparently, from what i can see Kirk69 is leaving neg feedback on 9/1/09 in response to negs given by ColdOne on 8/18/09 and Bill Siegle on 8/20/09.
Everyone must be aware that when you pass out negs the other party involved can and often will respond in kind, so it would not surprise me if Jason M.D. ends up with a neg from Kirk69 before too long.

It makes it hard to punish someone when all parties involved are guilty.

I am not condoning this behavior or Kirks backing out after posting "I'll take it", but a thread about his behavior in this forum should've been enough.
 
bad form. Mr. Siegle is a class act. he has 42 positve feedback! thanks to kirk69 1 uncalled for neg..:confused: get real kirk69, do what is right and fix this clusterfork! salvage your reputation while you can.
 
1kimo4u said:
bad form. Mr. Siegle is a class act. he has 42 positve feedback! thanks to kirk69 1 uncalled for neg..:confused: get real kirk69, do what is right and fix this clusterfork! salvage your reputation while you can.
Click to expand...


Or Kirk69 can .......... BLAME CANADA:D

But in seriousness, it is a shame that this "little human being" is defaming honourable BF members:thumbdn:
 
Karda said:
Apparently, from what i can see Kirk69 is leaving neg feedback on 9/1/09 in response to negs given by ColdOne on 8/18/09 and Bill Siegle on 8/20/09.
Everyone must be aware that when you pass out negs the other party involved can and often will respond in kind, so it would not surprise me if Jason M.D. ends up with a neg from Kirk69 before too long.

It makes it hard to punish someone when all parties involved are guilty.

I am not condoning this behavior or Kirks backing out after posting "I'll take it", but a thread about his behavior in this forum should've been enough.
Click to expand...

I think that is very easy to say when we are not the ones left holding the bag after this "child" backs out on deals IMO
 
Karda said:
Apparently, from what i can see Kirk69 is leaving neg feedback on 9/1/09 in response to negs given by ColdOne on 8/18/09 and Bill Siegle on 8/20/09.
Everyone must be aware that when you pass out negs the other party involved can and often will respond in kind, so it would not surprise me if Jason M.D. ends up with a neg from Kirk69 before too long.

It makes it hard to punish someone when all parties involved are guilty.

I am not condoning this behavior or Kirks backing out after posting "I'll take it", but a thread about his behavior in this forum should've been enough.
Click to expand...

Hi Karda,
I understand (and appreciate your concern) what may happen but I figure that anyone with any amount of common sense will read through the feedbacks and figure it out.

I don't know the others that this happened to, but I figured I would give my support even if it means getting a "negative" feedback.

Take care.
Jason
 
Karda said:
It makes it hard to punish someone when all parties involved are guilty.
Click to expand...

Please explain how everyone is guily... If someone says I will take it, and then does not, how is the person that received the I will take it guilty of anything, even if they do post a negative???
 
Karda said:
Apparently, from what i can see Kirk69 is leaving neg feedback on 9/1/09 in response to negs given by ColdOne on 8/18/09 and Bill Siegle on 8/20/09.
Everyone must be aware that when you pass out negs the other party involved can and often will respond in kind, so it would not surprise me if Jason M.D. ends up with a neg from Kirk69 before too long.

It makes it hard to punish someone when all parties involved are guilty.

I am not condoning this behavior or Kirks backing out after posting "I'll take it", but a thread about his behavior in this forum should've been enough.
Click to expand...


:confused: I have to admit you lost me on that one.

Guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
 
ColdOne said:
:confused:

Guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Click to expand...

Nah. Guilty of being from Canada. I left you a negative for that as well.
:D

EDITED TO ADD:
I sorta figured this guy would be back in the news before too long. It's pathetic that we have such a fantastic hobby that gets cornholed every once in awhile by such a very small handful of people like Kirk69. It's really sad.
 
Last edited:
All I'm saying is that posting this thread and Kirks knowledge of it should've been enough to change his behavior. I myself wouldnt have taken this to the itrader just yet, unless he continued to back out of deals and such after being made well aware. He shouldnt have needed to be made aware of his behavoir in the first place, but some people do...anywhere you go. :rolleyes: :grumpy:
I agree it is bad form for Kirk69 to post neg feedbacks in return for recieving them and it should be against the rules, but i kinda expected that he would. If this werent taken to itrader, maybe it would've had a little better outcome this time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top