It would be nice, as someone else already posted, to have some knife tests that actually:
1) Meant something
2) Was easy to understand
3) Related to actual knife use
maybe a blend of Cliff Stamp and Noss and something else....
.
Is it so hard to abstract what you see in his video to real world use? I figure if the knife doesn't chip out when he's chopping concrete, then
chances are that it will not chip out when cutting softer materials such as wood, cardboard, etc (note I say chances are, not definitely). If the knife chops 2x4's well, I'd imagine it will chop real world wood ok as well. Yeah, I'm gonna make those assumptions and while I won't believe them 100%, I won't know any better until I do it myself.
Comparatively, if I see one knife chopping much better than the other, then chances are it will be better at chopping in real world use as well. Would you say, even though you saw the Strider chopping poorly, that you wouldn't be able to say it chops worse than the other knives just because it's not real world usage?
Just how far does he have to go to do a real world test? Would he have to mimic your techniques? Because that will make a difference. If I really wanted to see what a knife could do, I'd do it myself. Watching it on video, even if it is real world, won't necessarily mean it'll work out that way for you. I think the videos are good to make observations from, though.
Maybe I just haven't browsed around enough, but how come I didn't see this sort of criticism when Swamp Rat chopped concrete with their Camp Tramp (or was it a Battle Rat?) and did a destruction test with their D2? I thought those tests were pretty neat, too.