madborderman07

I would think with today's military; Jesse Campbell would/could/will be in a world of trouble for being a scamming POS THIEF and doing nothing to correct same.

Integrity and honesty must be important for a soldier, yes?????
 
Well, look.... the military has a huge problem with gangs. This infiltration goes up into officer ranks. Drug dealing, extortion, thievery, you name it, the military now has plenty of it. Now, I'm not saying this guy, this thief, this Jesse Campbell, of Hattiesburg, MS, stationed at Camp Shelby is a gang member, I'm just saying that military service, even heroic service in wartime, does not necessarily make an honest man. It is unfortunate too, because so many in the military have security clearances granting them access to information that is, at the very least, sensitive, if not secret and above.

No, no, me thinks this Jesse Campbell, of Hattiesburg, MS, stationed at Camp Shelby had character problems long before entering military service, and certainly long before he stole a knife from Stomper.
 
Last edited:
StretchNM said:
Well, look.... the military has a huge problem with gangs. This infiltration goes up into officer ranks. Drug dealing, extortion, thievery, you name it, the military now has plenty of it.
Click to expand...

I see no evidence of gang activity, extortion, or drugs in this situation. I assume by the way you talk about it that you are also in the service? Sure the Army Times puts some pretty wild stories on their covers, but how common do you think this is?? The Military is a giant organization, and does have crime but I wouldn't say it "has a huge problem" and "plenty of it". I find your post irrelevant and more important inaccurate.
 
Hi John,

I may have some additional contact info for you. Email me if you are interested.


(You still have that BA-E V?) ;)
 
Bumping this up. Still no negative feedback for madborderman07. It seems as though this thread will die, but I for one will NEVER do business with him as it is obvious he is nothing more than a petty thief. :mad:
 
When I try to post on itrader it says I need to post the url for the transaction. He ordered by email, not on here. If someone knows how, please let me know.
 
Nothing has changed, he is still a scumbag............................
 
Since the deal was not made from a thread in the Bladeforum for sale forums, I don't think you can leave feedback on iTrader. That's a shame, but hopefully anyone thinking of dealing with madborderman07 will see this thread.
 
Well that would seem to explain why there is no negative feedback for i-trader. I wonder if there is a way around that though. After all, what threads must (can) be cited in order to leave feedback must be defined by someone. Spark maybe be able to change the requires parameters.

Also, and I'm just wondering out loud here, has anyone tried to contact his CO or the Provost Marshall?
 
on_the_edge said:
Well that would seem to explain why there is no negative feedback for i-trader. I wonder if there is a way around that though. After all, what threads must (can) be cited in order to leave feedback must be defined by someone. Spark maybe be able to change the requires parameters.

Also, and I'm just wondering out loud here, has anyone tried to contact his CO or the Provost Marshall?
Click to expand...

I could certainly do this ... but it would be something of a violation of protocol. It really should be the aggrieved party who makes this contact. His First or CO or Provost will need hard facts that I can't readily provide. For example, while I trust folks here, I cannot attest -- first hand -- to the facts.

I would expect these officials to treat Stomper's claim (and Stomper himself) with respect. If they don't, I absolutely would want to hear about it.

Yes, this should be done. Every system needs feedback, and that's what we're talking about here -- a little feedback to improve the military gene pool.
 
I was really addressing the contact portion of my previous thread to the OP. That said, while I agree contact with madborderman07's superiors should be done, it is IMO completely up to John one way or the other. I do not want him to feel pressure to do something he would not otherwise do. It is his call entirely. Really, I just wanted to highlight that it is still an option.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top