187DPT and Arktika are nice choices

---I want an Arktika; how do you like yours, Dogrunner?
I like it - it's a keeper!
What I like - the blade shape, especially the pointy but strong tip. That was the main attraction for me.
Thumb hole opener - it works well. This is a big, heavy folder, but operates very smoothly. Opening, lock manipulation.
It is in a league of its own in burliness and strength (ok, my 187DPT is there too, and I am sure there are other uberstrong folders that can legitimately function as folding fixed blades).
Good steel, holds an edge well, cuts well. D2 is not my favorite steel, but I am a steel snob and D2 is fine steel regardless of the many super steels available now. And as I noted previously, these are not slicey delicate cutting knives. If that is what you want, look at other options.
What I don't like - handle is too fat for my small hands/stubby fingers. Handle length is rarely a problem and I enjoy other 5+ inch handles (Spyderco Mili, Medford 187, Fantoni HB01, CS Recon and Talwar, etc). This one is just too girthy for me to wrap my hand around. I have not yet, but I plan to grind it down some to reduce it as much as I safely can. That is my only problem with it, and it does not stop me from using it.
One other thing to note - because of that handle it is quite chunky, and I do not find it to be a good pocket knife. I have no such concerns about the 187, with its more slender G10/Ti slabs. That one has some mass to it too, but the Arktika simply does not carry well in a pocket. So I carry it in a belt pouch, usually in my chore coat or tool bag. Works fine that way and still a more compact way to carry a 4+ inch blade than to carry a fixed blade.
Build quality on both my Medfords is excellent, tight tolerances, zero blade play, no hint of wiggle in any direction. The Arktika is noticeably smoother to operate than the 187, but both are easy and very well made.
Hope that helps.