I'm sorry, you're suggesting here that you are a lawyer involved with Federal Criminal practice,yet you made 2 completely inaccurate statements- when the sentencing guidelines went into effect and that there are no appeals from a guilty plea. Both Boats and I corrected you, I provided the citations to the relevant rules, and now you are saying what is available under the FOIA but you don't know how to obtain the clerk's files (they are not called case files). OK, you might want to dump the internet lawyer act.
Here is a little tutorial. It depends on the court, the local rules and procedures, etc... as to how you can obtain the clerk's files. If one has a subscription to Lexis or Westlaw there are some trial court files available but that is rare since these are mostly unreported cases. Some jurisdictions will have scanned images of the paperwork but that is spotty and depends on the funding and manpower of the clerk's office. There are some other online services like PACER that provide files for a fee. Most places you can go to the clerk's office and search their computer or check out the file, but you have to make copies there and they charge an arm and a leg. Even a simple file will be an inch thick and it is highly doubtful if any clerk's office will make a copy for you and send you it, they all tend to be overworked and understaffed. So you need to contact the clerk's office and find out what their policies are.
DO NOT ever insult me again by calling me a phucking Lawyer, that's a low blow!!!!

One quick tidbit; the criminal Investigation file is not subject to the FOIA. Motions for discovery are file and only granted the prosecution and defense and not the public. Tough to get it all even in a Civil Trial. If the Criminal case is televised one may be able to obtain lots of the file via TV but not the actual paperwork. Call me a lawyer, how dare you!!!!!

I have a 2X4 for you
Nah,I am just one of the white hat boys that watch folks charged with Federal Offenses where the original charge is No-prossed, a new Charge substituted and a negoiated plea agreed upon and accepted by the Court. there would be no incentive to plead if there was no room to negoiate. In Mick's case, he is one of the few 'carjackers" to be handled outside the State Courts even if there is an allegation of Interstawe transportation of Stoolen property. maybe he was an Merc Operator for one of the private Contractors and did what he did as an agent of them.. Highly unlikely bust so arfe California carjacking cases transferred to the US District Court.
And with this post I must now stop. This whole event has become an en ormous pissing contest. I have seen the evidence posted here as relayed by others via word of mouth, claims the DD214 was a fraud because of the way Honarble was [if it were written that way I would agree

, I mean Honorable!!!] and a slew of other facts. taken on face value without any defense case presented and the Jury would return a verdict in 20 minutes after taking a 15 minute smoking break. Furthermore, several are now working to get the unredacted paperwork to post here that will once and for all Identify the Liar. With what I have heard so far it's a no brainer with the ball back in the Strider Court. Silence now just corroborates guilt so it is truly important for the "defendant" to present his eveidence and quickly. Then we can all return to the good aspects of the knife world!!!!
I spent a lot of time in the Courts and watched Sentencing guidlines in the earlly to mid 90's dismissed by the Court on a routine basis.
Even Defense Lawyers in the Federal System know how to get around the "guidlines". States like mine at the State levekl have truth in sentencing Laws that are routinely and creatively not followed in order to get a plea. There was a test Pilot program of no negoiated pleas allowed and the Court became so backlogged that they discontinued the Pilot after three Months because instead of the standard 10% going to trial it was now at more than 90%.
So tell me I am wrong, tell me I cited inaccurate info. then ask any Prosecutor or Cop [State or Fed] who brings pukes to justice how many times they go down on the original charge and do time as the guidlines stipulate.
Nah, I have been there and one that and the Courts what they are because the system is what it is, flawed................
rant on, lets seek the Death penalty on Strider, his alleged posing must have caused the death of many both in war and in suicide because Mick stole their glory.:jerkit: I know exactly how it feels to get blown up in a firefight and then hear others who have never been there purport to have seen and been involved in worse just for the glory............
And once again to my E-mail buddies

I have no desire to nsupport of defend Mick Strider. I am not a supporter just as he is not an Ira supporter. I remember being accused of something on another Forum that resulted in my Banishment that quite a few knew to be bullshit. I don't remember Mick coming to my aid, support or at minimum demandiong to see the evidence.
My position is that the prosecution needs to rest because the Jury returned it's verdict a while ago and went home to start on their second bottle of single malt scotch.....
And one more; Guilty folks cannot appeal their conviction based on innocence or guilt. the Federal acknowledgement of rights form and waiver and the process one undertakes to plead guilty, which includes admitting they have pled guilty because they are guilty cannot appeal their guilt or innocence. They can only appeal errors in law.
Read the US Supremes rulings on this and as a NON-Lawyer I cannot cite the sites. But you Lawyers are; I am sure can find it and tell me I am wrong. Then as a Favor I will give you the US District Court I spend [t] lots of time in and was part and parcel to a whole slew of cases disposed of outside the guidlines. Then you can go after the Fed judges right after you crucify Mick some more. The Judicial Conduct Committee exists for this reason and others.
Man am I done here. I plan to be at Blade this year and look forward to those who want and plan to phuck Mick walk over to his table and advise him of such. Then go to the next table and advise Ernie and Mary Emerson never to lie for Mick again!!!
For the record I am not a dentist so just confront them in an adult fashion, without aggression and say what's on your mind face to face in an adult fashion. You might be shocked to find their rebuttal very civilized...............maybe not
