- Joined
- Nov 1, 2000
- Messages
- 28,365
You are missing the point.
Agreeing with "knives don't kill, people do" is agreeing with "guided missiles don't kill, people do". An explosive doesn't explode by itself if it's properly maintained, and if it isn't then the owner is at fault. As long as we insist that the problem is only with people, then logically there should not be restriction of ownership to any weapon. The most dangerous weapon in the world won't kill if the owner is competent and good, right?
Besides, insisting only on people can backfire. Let's say I take the argument that "knives don't kill, people do" at face value. If I propose a legislation that requires a permit (and background check) to carry a knife, you can't say no because I'm tackling the people problem. I'm making an effort to keep bad people away from carrying knives. Just like handguns, ownership of knives at home or place of business would not require a permit, but it would everywhere else.
Let's be reasonable here.
Switchblades and balisongs got prohibited because old school gangbangers used them. The last thing we need now is a jerk carrying a tactical knife scaring the ladies. That's not gonna end good.
You fail to see the fallacy that you are repeating. Registration... permits... knives must be stored in their blocks with a steel cable lock running through the hole in the tang? And what exactly would keep me from breaking the law and carrying a knife outside the house without a permit? A fine... possibly a week in the pokey? I prolly have at least 5 arrests for CA PC653k (switchblades/balisongs over 2") alone. Did that ever stop me? I'm not a violent criminal either.
You get it now?