The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
That's OK, Tombstone. Some folks are more comfortable being led than having to think for themselves. But I'd caution you against believing that sellers who post their bottom line prices don't charge people to use PayPal. If they accept PayPal, they bake those charges into their bottom line prices and pass them along to their customers. One way or the other, the buyer almost always pays the fees. The kicker is, it doesn't matter whether the buyer uses PayPal to pay for the item or not. If they're dealing with a "bottom line" (AKA TYD) seller who accepts PayPal, they're being charged the fees either way. Some people think that's fair. Others think it's trivial. I think it's a rip off. Having said that, I agree that the gift thing is a bad idea. In fact, I'd support a decision to ban its use on the Exchange altogether. I don't mind standing up to an unfair rule. But using PayPal's service and then refusing to pay for it is stealing. And that I can't condone.Ya that whole.mess gets confusing besides add this minus that etc etc. Put your bottom line price and let that be the end of it. Personally I don't feel good about charging people to use Paypal and the gift thing is a bad idea
if I were a seller and you were a buyer, wouldn't you like it if I at least asked you how you wanted to pay for an item and how you'd like me to ship it to you? And wouldn't you like your costs to be predicated on the choices you make rather than the choices I make for, .
if I were a seller I would be keeping in mind that I AM responsible for the item to get there as per blade forums rules if the item doesn't show the responsibility is mine so I think the couple of dollars for tracking and insurances is worth it if the buyer doesn't well that's fine but it's the seller that's taking the risk isn't it ????
Am I totally off base here?
My expectation in using "net to me" is that you understand that when all is said and done, the amount of money I need to have in order to sell my item to you is the amount of money I'll actually end up with. The rest is open to negotiation. Sellers who don't use that approach don't communicate. They demand! And they invariably hide their demands in their prices.I'm of the view that 95% of problems between otherwise reasonable people are due to inadequate communications. When we don't communicate well, I assume one thing, and you assume something else, and then we end up with a problem that could have been avoided. So maybe its helpful in a sales thread, or when making an offer, to spell out (as much as possible that is) in full detail one's expectations.
Who would you rather do business with?
As I said before, some folks prefer to be led while others prefer to think for themselves and give their customers the opportunity to do likewise.
There's no right or wrong answer here. I simply want to provide full disclosure and invite people to participate in crafting the terms and conditions of the sale rather than cram the terms and conditions down their throats and hide my selling costs in the prices I charge them. Admittedly, "net to me" selling isn't for everyone. It's only for those who have the wisdom to see that it's being done out of respect and not out of a desire to take advantage of them.
As I said before, some folks prefer to be led while others prefer to think for themselves and give their customers the opportunity to do likewise.
There's no right or wrong answer here. I simply want to provide full disclosure and invite people to participate in crafting the terms and conditions of the sale rather than cramming the terms and conditions down their throats and hiding my selling costs in the prices I charge them. Admittedly, "net to me" selling isn't for everyone. It's only for those who have the wisdom to see that it's being done out of respect and not out of a desire to take advantage of them.
As I said before, some folks prefer to be led while others prefer to think for themselves and give their customers the opportunity to do likewise.
There's no right or wrong answer here. I simply want to provide full disclosure and invite people to participate in crafting the terms and conditions of the sale rather than cram the terms and conditions down their throats and hide my selling costs in the prices I charge them. Admittedly, "net to me" selling isn't for everyone. It's only for those who have the wisdom to see that it's being done out of respect and not out of a desire to take advantage of them.
That's OK, Tombstone. Some folks are more comfortable being led than having to think for themselves. But I'd caution you against believing that sellers who post their bottom line prices don't charge people to use PayPal. If they accept PayPal, they bake those charges into their bottom line prices and pass them along to their customers. One way or the other, the buyer almost always pays the fees. The kicker is, it doesn't matter whether the buyer uses PayPal to pay for the item or not. If they're dealing with a "bottom line" (AKA TYD) seller who accepts PayPal, they're being charged the fees either way. Some people think that's fair. Others think it's trivial. I think it's a rip off. Having said that, I agree that the gift thing is a bad idea. In fact, I'd support a decision to ban its use on the Exchange altogether. I don't mind standing up to an unfair rule. But using PayPal's service and then refusing to pay for it is stealing. And that I can't condone.
As I said before, some folks prefer to be led while others prefer to think for themselves and give their customers the opportunity to do likewise.
There's no right or wrong answer here. I simply want to provide full disclosure and invite people to participate in crafting the terms and conditions of the sale rather than cram the terms and conditions down their throats and hide my selling costs in the prices I charge them. Admittedly, "net to me" selling isn't for everyone. It's only for those who have the wisdom to see that it's being done out of respect and not out of a desire to take advantage of them.