If Queen becomes a boutique producer and changes over from D2 (or other excellent tool, carbon or even high end stainless) to lesser steels...then I'll have to content myself with the pieces I already own as there won't be anything there of interest to me.
I would classify Queen (and GEC) as a boutique producer already.
They are limited production, not high-volume. In terms of business model, marketing, distribution and manufacturing processes, they are a relatively small business with limited mass market. Yes, they happen to use traditional hard use tool steels, just like GEC uses carbon.
Compare Queen in this way to Buck, Case, Victorinox, Opinel or even Kershaw. Those brands are all high volume, mass produced and more mass marketed.
Nothing here is a ding against Queen in any way. Most areas of production and collecting give rise to both mass market vendors and more boutique names. Both have their place.
I hope I'm not stepping on toes saying this. But this came up in a discussion about GEC's Sodbusters and their Farm and Field line of knives.
Is GEC's intention to make real working knives or homages to working knives.
The same could be said about Queen. If they are going to make real working knives to be used by real working folk in real working situations, they need to hit price points similar to what Buck, Case, Victorinox, Kershaw, CRKT and Opinel (ouch) are hitting. They also need to show up on bubble pack on retail displays at brick and mortar stores and to compete with these brands.
I don't see it. Queen has an opportunity to produce wonderful traditional knives, but like GEC, "traditional" here means homages to knife designs of the past at higher prices.