The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
OP one last thing...Read Col. David Hackworth's book,About Face, and you will see where alot of us are coming from. There is a Big difference between Professional soldiers and folks that were "there". A Pro learns his trade the rest do their part and get the "F" out.
Stop the debate and Read what the Pro's have to say...if you need a list, speak up.
2 Panther
I was debating over whether I wanted to join this conversation, as these threads routinely devolve into useless arguments. But all these claims that those who carry more than a nail file into combat are living in a fantasy world are getting under my skin.
This is going to seem incredibly self-serving, but it proves a point so I'm going to put it out there. I started a thread in the Cold Steel subforum about carry in combat. If you want to see examples of soldiers carrying knives into harm's way, you can see them in that thread. Pay particular attention to Mike Sastre's post #5.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1365808-Cold-Steel-Knives-In-Combat
Need more proof? Dietmar Pohl wrote a whole book on the subject several years ago.
More proof still? Here are just a few of the photos I've dug up (there are plenty more). A fixed-blade is in evidence in every one of these pictures. None of these guys looks like a rear echelon type to me.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Seriousbladeno1, you are correct about fixed blades. They are faster to draw, more intuitive to manipulate, and safer to use than folders. If I were to enter a combat zone now, I'd strap one of these to my vest.
![]()
If I was cramped for space or in and out of vehicles a lot, I'd opt for one of these two.
![]()
You and Royce are also right about refusing to allow the undue influence of others to dictate your actions and determine (and potentially seal) your fate. I hope that there are at least some reading these forums who heed your words.
-Steve
P.S. - This is one beautiful knife!
![]()
P.P.S. - leghog, I recognize those modifications to your Ka-Bar. Did you happen to get your copy of Don Paul's book at the Ranger Joe's located outside of Ft. Benning? That's where I bought mine in August of 1989. What a great, fun, outside-of-the-box-thinking book that is! This world needs more Don Pauls!
That was certainly a lot of pics to quote.
apparently i for one need a list... this is the second post you have stated the rest of us don't know anything and the "real soldiers" are gonna tell it like it really is, so how about making at least one single point in one of your posts that actually adds to this conversation or stop posting nonsense in it. The Op didn't ask for trolls, he asked a pretty straight forward set of questions, so why the negativity? oh, and one last thing; if you actually have a simple point that pertains to this thread from col. Hackworth's book, why not a quote or some stats instead of just telling us that this book has all the answers?
p.s. you wouldn't happen to be retired military by any chance?
OP one last thing...Read Col. David Hackworth's book,About Face, and you will see where alot of us are coming from. There is a Big difference between Professional soldiers and folks that were "there". A Pro learns his trade the rest do their part and get the "F" out.
Stop the debate and Read what the Pro's have to say...if you need a list, speak up.
Agree with your first and last point. And although a folder can be deployed just as fast as a fixed blade in civilian clothes, ever try to take something out of your pocket wearing 100 lbs or armor and gear? It's a pain in the ass, and not fast at all. Fixed blade strapped to the chest is much much faster. Also far more convenient, which is probably one of the reasons I used mine so much even though a folder would have worked.
Wow.I would also wear either a Shirley-Owens Daily Kiri or a Spyderco ARK.
After a firefight in early 2007. I'd used/abused my knife to pry frozen 120mm mortar rounds out of their carriers.
![]()
apparently i for one need a list... this is the second post you have stated the rest of us don't know anything and the "real soldiers" are gonna tell it like it really is, so how about making at least one single point in one of your posts that actually adds to this conversation or stop posting nonsense in it. The Op didn't ask for trolls, he asked a pretty straight forward set of questions, so why the negativity? oh, and one last thing; if you actually have a simple point that pertains to this thread from col. Hackworth's book, why not a quote or some stats instead of just telling us that this book has all the answers?
p.s. you wouldn't happen to be retired military by any chance?
Just an FYI, Hackworth left the Army one step ahead of a court martial for all the illegal things that he instigated, primarily in Vietnam. He was given the choice of "resign or be prosecuted". I would be very careful to give much credence to someone like him. The JAG officer who gave him the choice was a seasoned combat vet also (Omaha Beach in WW2 for one).
...but what did he have to say about fixed blades? that's what's gonna keep me up at nights
Dear brother from across the Atlantic ocean, Whip
First of all, I am more than delighted to read your addition and many thanks for effort you made to uncover successfully other side of what escalated into the uneven debate over here....thanks for great photography collection, from variety of soldiers, because these guys and their knives are centre of this particular discussion.
Thank you
When and where do you think it became a common practice (with the Germans anyway)?So, to be sure I understand your point, you think a shorter weapon with much less leverage is somehow more effective? What does WWI have to do with your fallacious point?