I was debating over whether I wanted to join this conversation, as these threads routinely devolve into useless arguments. But all these claims that those who carry more than a nail file into combat are living in a fantasy world are getting under my skin.
This is going to seem incredibly self-serving, but it proves a point so I'm going to put it out there. I started a thread in the Cold Steel subforum about carry in combat. If you want to see examples of soldiers carrying knives into harm's way, you can see them in that thread. Pay particular attention to Mike Sastre's post #5.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1365808-Cold-Steel-Knives-In-Combat
Need more proof? Dietmar Pohl wrote a whole book on the subject several years ago.
More proof still? Here are just a few of the photos I've dug up (there are plenty more). A fixed-blade is in evidence in every one of these pictures. None of these guys looks like a rear echelon type to me.
Seriousbladeno1, you are correct about fixed blades. They are faster to draw, more intuitive to manipulate, and safer to use than folders. If I were to enter a combat zone now, I'd strap one of these to my vest.
If I was cramped for space or in and out of vehicles a lot, I'd opt for one of these two.
You and Royce are also right about refusing to allow the undue influence of others to dictate your actions and determine (and potentially seal) your fate. I hope that there are at least some reading these forums who heed your words.
-Steve
P.S. - This is one beautiful knife!
P.P.S. - leghog, I recognize those modifications to your Ka-Bar. Did you happen to get your copy of Don Paul's book at the Ranger Joe's located outside of Ft. Benning? That's where I bought mine in August of 1989. What a great, fun, outside-of-the-box-thinking book that is! This world needs more Don Pauls!