I read an article about a male high school teacher that had sex with a 17 year old student. She had pursued him. He broke it off, left the school and moved. Somehow, unintentionally on the part of both parties, she ends up running into him and pursues him again. They end up having sex. Her parents find out and he fully cooperates with police.
It goes to trial. The girl flat out says she engaged and pursued. She said he didn't pressure or try to influence her into it. The only reason it was pursued was her parents.
Long story short, the jury found the guy not guilty. Their reasoning was that he already lost his job and can't work again in the career field. They couldn't see ruining his life for the next 10 years and labeling him a rapist when there wasn't any damage or abuse. One juror asked something like, "Who does it serve to imprison this man? How does it serve justice?"
Needless to say, the prosecution was pissed.
A different case here in Utah involved an attractive female teacher. Long long story short, she had sex with a 17 year old male student that was pursuing her. There was no coercion, no abuse of power, and he wasn't traumatized. She lost her job, husband (understandably), and went to prison.
Now look, I'm not saying what they did was right and I'm not advocating for adults to be allowed to have sexual relations with underage individuals.
I do believe we need to look at the spirit of the law and not just the letter of the law; the intent of the law matters. "Who does this serve?" And "How does this serve justice?" are questions we should be asking.