The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Tech Support and help is a better place to ask about thread-jacking. That said, most us do not separate how a company or maker operates from their product. This was covered a while ago in said tech support sub-forum when an obvious white supremacist maker was coming under fire."Your thread didn't get hijacked, you asked for feedback on two knives. You can't selectively pre-screen opinions on a knife when some of those opinions are rooted in matters that go beyond the knife itself."
I'm asking a question about hijacking in general here. Since you brought it up though, in my original post I made it pretty clear that I was interested in a comparison between the two knives themselves without consideration of "matters that go between the knife (knives) itself (themselves).
"You also got a lot of feedback with alternative knife suggestions but failed to comment or respond to them. That kinda paints you as not terribly interested in feedback that you didn't want to hear."
Surveys consistently show that the vast majority of people are indeed not terribly interested in feedback that (they) didn't want to hear.
"At the end of the day, both these knives are incredibly inexpensive and probably don't deserve the time and energy they've gotten."
Given the length of this thread, it seems that many folks believe they do deserve the time and energy.
"You can spend just a few dollars more and do a lot better than either."
Agreed. Thank you.
So, you started a thread asking for feedback when you actually didn't want feedback beyond your pre-established frame of reference. I understand now. This was a validation request.I'm asking a question about hijacking in general here. Since you brought it up though, in my original post I made it pretty clear that I was interested in a comparison between the two knives themselves without consideration of "matters that go between the knife (knives) itself (themselves).
Surveys consistently show that the vast majority of people are indeed not terribly interested in feedback that (they) didn't want to hear.
You asked for opinions regarding two knives. There are many strong negative opinions about one of them, and they were voiced.
I wouldn't call it a thread hijack at all. Thread drift, perhaps, but still on topic.
"I want opinions on something, but I only want to hear the opinions I want to hear"
Yea, but no.
I'm still just trying to figure out what actual model(s) ZT ripped off, and why Corey keeps tapdancing around answering what his criteria actually IS, for what is and is not a clone/copy/counterfeit????????
So far all I see are blanket accusatory statements with some vague personal code being applied.
Good morning.
On a different thread on this forum a few days ago, you said that you wouldn't recommend the Cold Steel Tuff Lite because of Cold Steel's business practices.
I then asked you if hypothetically the Tuff Lite were made by a different company would you recommend it and you replied, "Yes 100% hypothetically...".
So, hypothetically, if the CRK Sebenza never existed but the SRM 7010 did exist in its present form, would you say that it's a nice inexpensive knife?
Good morning.
On a different thread on this forum a few days ago, you said that you wouldn't recommend the Cold Steel Tuff Lite because of Cold Steel's business practices.
I then asked you if hypothetically the Tuff Lite were made by a different company would you recommend it and you replied, "Yes 100% hypothetically...".
So, hypothetically, if the CRK Sebenza never existed but the SRM 7010 did exist in its present form, would you say that it's a nice inexpensive knife?
I'm flattered that a throwaway comment I made over 2 weeks ago still holds so much influence over you. However, you're likely to go unsatisfied. Whether you're hoping for 9 more pages of people failing to convince each other of anything or you're just enthralled by my personal shopping habits neither is the subject of this thread. I've gone as far off-topic as I'm likely to go.
You made accusations, then refused to back them up. I hear these arguments all the time and NO ONE has been able to give me any examples when I ask. Then some of them go on and use the same arguments in other threads even though they can never back it up. Trying to influence new members to their side.
It's frustrating. And pathetic. Put your money where your mouth is, or close your mouth. Simple.
What exact accusations did I make in this regard? I said that ZT's designs are too similar to others for my tastes. It's the truth. I don't know which new members you are talking about, and I don't believe that I've influenced any of them. I wasn't even aware that I had a side.
I have no doubt that you're frustrated. I believe that it's the greatest motivator behind many of your posts. I truly hope that you solve that issue, though I doubt that I can be of much help on that front. Your frustrations existed before we crossed paths and will continue long after we've forgotten each other. That being said, I do find this post intriguing given that you're among those that have lectured the OP on accepting whatever opinions are shared and not trying to steer threads in the direction of his choice. It seems that your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
I do put my money where my mouth is. I buy the knives that I prefer and steer clear of those that I don't. Thanks for the suggestion, however unnecessary. As for closing my mouth, I don't believe that you have the authority to issue that order. As such I will give it all due consideration and completely disregard it.![]()