- Joined
- Mar 31, 2009
- Messages
- 2,237
ALL of which has accomplished nothing more than to prove that several of us (me included) has some extra time on our hands this fine Friday afternoon and whats wrong with that? NaDa.
:thumbup:
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
ALL of which has accomplished nothing more than to prove that several of us (me included) has some extra time on our hands this fine Friday afternoon and whats wrong with that? NaDa.
I do not propose to speak for what Cynic meant nor do I necessarily ascribe philosophical processes to the discussions of knives but I didn't take it there either. As far as what Kant meant and how that relates I would just say this. IF the world as it lives in our mind at least was devideable into two arenas of the known (or knowable) Kant would have you believe that the Noumenon would constitute the knowable without benefit of having seen it, experienced it or identified the object or event with your senses. These would certainly comprise the loftier realities( i.e. God) as for the other broader category of phenomenon or things we find knowable or we consider familiar through use of our senses.
(i.e. knives) Again, I think Cynic by his own admission was being humorous as was I but the response was to my supposition of what is the nature of "over rated" and what is meant by the question.
I advanced the theory that when someone asks is something over rated are they really asking (or better yet, should they be asking) is it over priced?
I then attempted to answer both questions in the context of as compared to what.
ALL of which has accomplished nothing more than to prove that several of us (me included) has some extra time on our hands this fine Friday afternoon and whats wrong with that? NaDa.
I like this answer. :thumbup:
Edited to add: I'm not completely retarded fellas, but I'm used to talking knives on Bladeforums. Philosophy doesn't pop up too often so pardon my ignorance. Also, when philosophy is brought up it seems a lot of unnecessarily large words are thrown about. I've got a couple SAT and power words stored in the memory bank, but I rarely use them, so again, I'm sorry. I also had to google half of what I was trying to understand so I was frustrated. Anyway, so where can this thread possibly go from here?
not to take this in a wildly different direction, but...
If we are talking about differences in the phenomenal appearance and perception of objects, then it is possible to determine a hierarchy of differentiation by degree: This is intersubjective verifiability--the very foundation of "science".
There is the potentiality for an infinitude of possibilities for anything that is perceived noumenally. Though a set group of daseins may agree on a singularity of a noumenal appearance, that political agreement in no way excludes the potentiality for all other possible perceptions of that noumenal object.
Peanut butter and jelly?
Sebenza!!!
Ohhhhh. Yeah, I still don't understand what you're saying, but whatever. I'll just read the other posts. Thanks for trying to dumb it down for me though. :thumbup:
Sebenza!!!
Must be a slow day...![]()
Lets get back on topic. The sebanza is over priced and over rated. No I have never handled one.
They are beautiful knives.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lets get back on topic. The sebanza is over priced and over rated. No I have never handled one.
Yeah they are, but I can't get past the performance of the soft S30V that's why I am waiting for CRK to change to S35VN before I buy one.