Tim the Wizard
Street Samurai
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2012
- Messages
- 3,797
I think many here would agree that, based on the video, the Cold Steel product has a good argument for strength.
As a matter of philosophy, while I appreciate an over-built product, there is an argument for finesse and strength that matches use.
I would disagree that these products are designed with the same priorities in mind.
As the makers discuss in the video, the Cold Steel product is designed with strength in mind.
A Sebenza is, by any measure, designed for cutting, ease of maintenance, and to a large degree for the aesthetic of the design.
Is the comparison valid? I do not think so.
It would be like saying a bass drum and a snare drum should produce a noise at the same frequency.
They were designed with different principles in mind.
That said, I enjoyed the video and I thought the speaker was clear in what they were doing. It was fun to watch, and it does help us understand aspects of the product that the test was designed to measure.
As a matter of philosophy, while I appreciate an over-built product, there is an argument for finesse and strength that matches use.
I would disagree that these products are designed with the same priorities in mind.
As the makers discuss in the video, the Cold Steel product is designed with strength in mind.
A Sebenza is, by any measure, designed for cutting, ease of maintenance, and to a large degree for the aesthetic of the design.
Is the comparison valid? I do not think so.
It would be like saying a bass drum and a snare drum should produce a noise at the same frequency.
They were designed with different principles in mind.
That said, I enjoyed the video and I thought the speaker was clear in what they were doing. It was fun to watch, and it does help us understand aspects of the product that the test was designed to measure.