Totally true- If it was meant to be a safety feature..
What else then if not safety?
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Totally true- If it was meant to be a safety feature..
What else then if not safety?
And apparently, they won't test knives they know they can't beat either.
Behold the Tri-Ad's kryptonite:Which folding production knives they can't beat? Show examples please.
When it gets to the point that a safety issue is involved. I tend to stay way away from that point. If I'm going to err, I'll err on the side of safety every time. YMMV.
But if a safety issue isn't involved with almost any other lock design for that task is it an issue of safety or a design failure?
Behold the Tri-Ad's kryptonite:
![]()
Source: http://www.bladehq.com/item--Extrema-Ratio-185-RAO-Tactical--10005
Where is the safety issue exactly?
I'm not following you.But if a safety issue isn't involved with almost any other lock design for that task is it an issue of safety or a design failure?
You and me both, ourgon. You and me both!I would like to see it vs. CS 4-Max.
Applying lateral torque as to pop out a chip of wood when whittling. Most lock designs, or even nonlocking folders, can do that without any safety issues coming up. Unfortunately, with a framelock you're applying force in a manner that will, unless significant care is taken, unlock it.
So, I think that ER can survive test but with blade play after...You and me both, ourgon. You and me both!
Did you see the failure as you describe, or the video and apply it to something you relate to?
You didn't see the Sebenza fail during whittling..You are making an assumption that it would fail..I have cut many things with mine over ~20yrs and have yet to see this failure.