The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
America has reached 250 years, and I am grateful to be here, in the best country in the world. Thank every one of you who helps make this country a better place, those who have gone before and risked it all, and those who've paid the ultimate price to make the United States what we are today.
Happy Birthday America! Let Freedom Ring for all time!
Just ordered one.
Been waiting for this to come out since the images of the proto surfaced.
I'm not a fan of the blue back spacer.
Maybe I can get a custom back spacer made though.
I love the look, just wish is was about $100 cheaper.
I love the look, just wish is was about $100 cheaper.
Just dye it.
The Technk has the same thickness behind the edge as thr Paramilitary 2. So initiating a cut wont feel harder than a P2, assuming it is sharp. The grind is also quite lean on such a beefy blade. Overal, eyeballing the blsde geometry, it isn't too far off from the Para 2's geometry. Basically this means, unless you are cutting fruit up or a few other mediums. The Techno will perform great.
If both the Para 2 and the Techno are true full flat grinds, the physics of angulation would say there is no possible way that a 4.5mm thick spine can be the same thickness behind the edge as a 3.5mm thick spine if the blades are the same depth (which they appear to be in the OP). If anything, the Techno looks to be less deep so I don't see how people can say that the blade is the same thickness behind the edge as the para2?
I'm not criticizing as I have a Techno en route but it's just not a logical observation unless the Techno is somewhat hollow ground.
If both the Para 2 and the Techno are true full flat grinds, the physics of angulation would say there is no possible way that a 4.5mm thick spine can be the same thickness behind the edge as a 3.5mm thick spine if the blades are the same depth (which they appear to be in the OP). If anything, the Techno looks to be less deep so I don't see how people can say that the blade is the same thickness behind the edge as the para2?
I'm not criticizing as I have a Techno en route but it's just not a logical observation unless the Techno is somewhat hollow ground.
The Techno could come down to the same thickness behind the edge using steeper angles on the grind. I never said the grinds were of the same geometry.