State of the state.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Scurvy, Lycosa,
I linked that Bloomberg story in post #3 of this thread. Sheesh.... kids these days... no attention span, never listening, always looking for instant gratification... :p

Opps haha.

Well in my defense, you did kind of bury the lead at the tail end of your post. I put it on front street which might be why Lycosa saw mine first. I did actually read every reply in this thread.

That being said, I think the article is so good, it should be sprinkled throughout this article to maximize the number of readers.
 
There's a huge difference between the fanboy enthusiasm of Survive! Knives \ Carothers Performance Knives and true Collectors.
 
Didn't mean to offend anyone. Opinions are simply rash statements, without too much thought, and shouldn't be taken so seriously.

Seeing how much things have changed in California over the past 40 years, I wrote that -along with having 3 children, ranging in age from 9 to 29.

From a time when pocket knives were sold in Disneyland when I was a child, to the current "fear mongering" pushed on today's youth by Politicians and bureaucrats in the States, I personally don't see a bright future for knives (or firearms) in this country. Common sense and trust seem to have gone out the window.

Maybe the "Tactical folder" world is different, but when I wrote that -I was thinking about the work during the Golden age of knifemaking. To me, the work of Loveless, Moran, Warenski, etc. -just to mention a few well known makers (there are many, many more great makers who aren't so well known!!) is timeless -but only a very small percentage of unique 20-30 year olds in California can slow down enough to take a look and appreciate the work in detail.

Don't want to get in a debate about CNC here, but holding one of these "classic" knives is as uniquely American as an original Colt Peacemaker or a '67 Mustang. A CNC'd knife, to me, is similar to a Glock or a Tesla -it may be numerically controlled perfection, but the raw talent is missing. On a grander scale, can anyone alive today recreate the Sistine Chapel, or have the skills been lost and forgotten? Did the demand for pushing the limits of human skill wane for faster mass production?

Maybe it's simply a shift in demographic interest and financial abilities? Maybe we're just all getting old? However, for me, the important thing is to collect for YOU ... then it doesn't matter what happens financially.

Please carry on the discussion and ignore my ramblings if they seem to be offensive -although none is intended.

Thank you for having the guts to bring this up Steven. :thumbup:

to be clear, I'm not offended by what you said, and doubt anyone else is. Everyone has every right to express their opinion here.
I've just seen that particular position taken so often in this forum that I needed to say something about it. Did not intend to single you out, cuz you ain't the only one :)
 
Of those who have come by my shop....in search on learning.....most appear to be under 30 ( I consider that young.!), and some are
probably under 25.....

As a matter of potential perspective, Plato also had criticisms of the younger generation......as has each generation since......and it's possible
that what we may see as the younger's shortcomings, is little more than a reflection of our failure to invest in them....

I heavily invest in the younger generation, and have for years, be it mentoring, or whatnot.

They reach a point where they reject the teachings of the previous generation to strike out on their own, which is why we have overpriced folding prybars flying off the shelves and classic beauties languishing.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
There's a huge difference between the fanboy enthusiasm of Survive! Knives \ Carothers Performance Knives and true Collectors.

I know we enjoy the same type of knives and superb craftsmanship but as a Collector, and certainly not a Fanboy of anyone's, I relish and very much enjoy my relationship with the Carothers and the astonishingly 'perfect' knives that come from their shop, let alone his World Class heat-treating knowledge and application's of such.

CPK knives are just beginning where many CNC'd knives have (dismally, usually) ended, IMHO, and are the polar opposite of the finest one-at-a-time handmade cutlery pieces.....all exceptionally fine and striving for perfection in their own right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
There's a huge difference between the fanboy enthusiasm of Survive! Knives \ Carothers Performance Knives and true Collectors.

I'm not a collector, so I'm not sure if anyone cares about my thoughts, but do I have some thoughts. Hopefully I don't offend anyone.

Some people collect things that I consider to have very little intrinsic value, and pay dearly for them. Baseball cards come to mind.

If I were a collector, and had a big budget, I would be attracted to items of real worth that represent some aspect of human achievement. I understand why people collect cars. They're beautiful, interesting and the engineering and design that go into them makes me proud of the human race. So I understand the mindset of a person who acquires a McLaren F1 and then never drives it. It's what that car represents.

I expect that most people here are familiar with the SR71 Blackbird. In many ways it represents the pinnacle of human achievement (at the time) in speed, materials science, mechanical and aeronautical engineering, and it's just so beautiful to look at. I'm sure it would rank pretty high on some people in this worlds list of holy grail collectables, if one were available and money were no object.

But, most folks aren't going to be accumulating a lot of high end cars and aircraft. And this is what's interesting about high end knives. Here is a thing that normal people can acquire. I will never own a Bugatti Veyron, but I can (and do!) own a Cashen damascus fighter. I understand the design, metallurgy and construction and am therefor able to admire it. I know the maker and I admire him. Here is a thing, that I was able to acquire, that in my mind is pretty close to the pinnacle of what is humanly possible for an object of its sort to be. And it's cool and it's beautiful. And a schlup like me was able to acquire it. :thumbup:

IMO, what makes it beautiful isn't embellishment or even fit and finish. It's the form and the knowledge in my mind about its performance and capabilities. I love it for how it looks, and I love it for the engineering it represents. I expect there are many collectors drawn to work like that.


Personally, I don't generally think of knives as being art. Not usually anyways. There are some makers, Tai Goo for example, who make art work and use knives as their medium. But makers like that are uncommon. What I usually see are fancy pieces with very good fit and finish and often highly detailed ornamentation. There's nothing wrong with that, and I understand why people admire the work. But, when one considers the SR71 actually had pretty bad fit and finish and no ornamentation at all, one can see the other end of the spectrum where an object can be admired for what it actually is, rather than how fancy and decorated its visible surfaces are.


And this brings me to my point: I walk around a knife show and I look at the collectable knives. They're "functional art", but in the real world the designs often aren't very optimal for real use, the materials and heat treat are probably sometimes pretty mediocre, and they often have a fairly useless cutting edge, so they're not particularly functional, and IMO they're usually not great pure art either. I understand why they appeal to people because they're pretty and they're cool and it takes a lot of skill to execute a good one. I'm not trying to disparage those who make them or collect them. It certainly makes more sense to me to collect than something like expensive old baseball cards. But, to me and my own tastes, many of the collectable knives have less appeal than modern well executed cutting pieces that are made with careful consideration for cutting performance, metallurgy and materials and ergonomics. Which is more beautiful, an intricate and embellished baroque cathedral, or an SR71? The answer, I think, is just a matter of opinion. I think both views are valid.



I know: too long didn't read....
 
Last edited:
Not to drift too far off track:

Are CPK's a "gateway drug" to finer craftsmanship and a higher understanding of knives which will expand and sustain the custom knife market? Or are they the high end for the collector who has every Spyderco PM2 Sprint Run?

This thread highlights what I was saying:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1414006-Besides-CPK-knives-whaddaya-like/page2

Dawkind and Bentzer are the exceptions in that fanbase.

I know the reason I'm buying Nathan's knives and you obviously don't understand what it is I am seeing. And I won't bother to explain, since you mispelled my name, LOL.:D:D

Separate from that, I do find it interesting that tacticals (all of which are pretty much folders, right?) are part of the correction being discussed, but CPK's fixed blades are going in quite the opposite direction - in terms of the number of customers rising, certainly not the pricing. This has no bearing on my previous statement, but IMHO, the rise in tacticals took a chunk of interest out of custom fixed blades. Shouldn't one think that the interest now being expressed in a totally fixed blade maker be a positive?

If the generation that typically roams this room keeps referring to younger collectors of knives in derogatory terms, do you think that helps any to narrow the divide that already separates the two generations? Maybe I should post a link of this thread into a new thread in the CPK subforum so the generation who our generation has screwed can see what's being said about them. Nah, that's inappropriate, kinda like taking potshots at names and stuff ya don't really know enough about .

I can show you a dagger by Nathan Carothers that is so absolutely perfect in every way that I would challenge 99% of living custom makers to equal it. And I know my daggers. And I know his customers. They would LOVE one just like it. And one day, it will be finally understood that the machining skills needed to produce that dagger are as artfully practiced as you would find with the work of custom knifemakers in this forum right now.


END OF SERMON
 
Last edited:
Add to the lack of interest and current glut of knives- The custom knives in older collectors hands that will soon be put back into the food chain as they retire and or pass on. This will further saturate an already saturated market?

Anyone else suffer from a collectors gene? Some people just don't have it.

Are high end custom kitchen and food prep knives also lingering?
 
Add to the lack of interest and current glut of knives- The custom knives in older collectors hands that will soon be put back into the food chain as they retire and or pass on. This will further saturate an already saturated market?

Anyone else suffer from a collectors gene? Some people just don't have it.

Sort of the point to the whole thread.

Are high end custom kitchen and food prep knives also lingering?

Not at all, because it is more of a use/status item than anything else.....$100,000 kitchen remodel for the DINKS(that's Dual Income, No Kids) $500.00-$5,000.00 kitchen knife, no problem!

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
... Which is more beautiful, an intricate and embellished baroque cathedral, or an SR71?..

Not one word of a lie, I have a new mint condition copy of Sled Driver by Brian Shul, autographed, that is the only book sideways cover out on display on my wall of book shelves. Not sure if you are aware of what it is so maybe this doesn't make sense and you probably have NO idea what lengths I went through to get a copy and have it autographed.


Not to drift too far off track:

Are CPK's a "gateway drug" to finer craftsmanship and a higher understanding of knives which will expand and sustain the custom knife market? Or are they the high end for the collector who has every Spyderco PM2 Sprint Run?

This thread highlights what I was saying:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1414006-Besides-CPK-knives-whaddaya-like/page2

Dawkind and Bentzer are the exceptions in that fanbase.

Let me share my opinion since that what everyone seems to be doing here.

I would consider myself young. I have two young children, a wife at home caring for them who has been off work for years, and probably will remain so. A small modest house with a reasonable mortgage, and a household income well above average. I would say I am representative of a percentage of newer collectors not all that uncommon. I say this as I seem to share the opinion of many of my peers.

This commentary is not directed solely at you, and may seem harsh.

There are a lot more makers out there who think they are a lot better at what they do than I think they are, and ask a lot more for what they are selling than I think it's worth. So simply put, I am not motivated to buy their wares.

In total, I have about $12,000-$15,000 on the high end tied up in my "collection" of knives, maybe 24 pieces in total. Some people have exponentially more than that in a single knife. Why? Because they have either a lot more money than I do, or a lot more debt than I do.

It's simple really, it's economics like have been talked about earlier. My friends, peers where I live, and people I know who share the same passion for knives that I do, all make $100,000-$200,000 and simply can't afford many $1000+ expenses. One of the main reasons is because life has become massively more expensive than it used to be, and incomes have not grown to match. As others have mentioned, the Baby boomers have massively damaged the economy through spending and consuming at a rate which was unsustainable, and they simply won't pay for it. This is reflected in national debt. My generation is dealing with the bill, and the next one will pay for even more. My income tax rate is over 50% all in. I pay more in taxes than I do housing, transportation, clothing and food. And I am WAY above average income! Tell me, how many large collectors faced that when they were young and starting out? I pay more in tax than the average person makes where I live. If I can't afford high end knives, living a lifestyle similar to the average, how can they?

Preferences for discretionary spending have also changed. This is the other fact many ignore, there are way more places to spend discretionary income now than there used to be. I know PLENTY of people that spend $1000+ a year on a phone, but their phone is something they use with great regularity. How many of them could be argued into forgoing every second year's upgrade and buy a $1000 knife instead to sit in a display? Probably none. Knives are being out competed.

If a maker is trying to sell his products to a very small % of the top 1%-2% of earners in the world, how many people does that actually represent? Not many. And how many of them are young? Think about the current trends in wealth distribution for a second. The very rich are getting richer, not the middle class are getting rich.

IMO, collectors and makers do not determine the value of a knife, the market does. A maker can't say my knife is worth $5000 and so he is entitled to $5000. He can ask the market and it will give an answer. If it is not selling, that is because it is not currently marketed to the right person, or it is worth less than asking price. Think about it for a second. It's not that there is no market. I bet every single knife you high end guys are thinking about that is languishing on a site or something would sell at a price significantly lower than it is now. Maybe that is the CURRENT market value. It can't sit languishing, yet sell it for less than it's worth, the market tells you what it's worth. Maybe you don't like that.

Anyways, back to the young. So if it's not the young who have the money, who is the market for these kinds of knives then? Who has the money to buy this kind of thing? Not the young, so where are the middle aged people who's kids have now moved out, are dual income or something with houses paid for, maybe several hundred thousand in home equity and a decent nest egg, so comparatively speaking tons of money? Why aren't they the "market"?

Maybe I am completely wrong, and there are tons of young people with tons of money to spend because they still live at home. If so, I don't know any of them. Hell, maybe they are out blowing it on hookers and blow. I don't know. At the end of the day, I like many people I know...with regards to the opinion of most of the people QQing about us here..... we are as unconcerned, as they are unaware of the inaccuracies of the vast majority of their opinions and the state of the state they have created. Like Tupac said, "I was given this world I didn't make it".

Most of us youngin's realized long ago, you don't change the minds of the old, you let their ideas die with them.

So answering your question on CPK:

CPK is not a gateway to better craftsmanship. As Bob said, 99% of the makers around couldn't achieve what Nathan can and he does it at a fraction of the price.

CPK is currently making, though credit to Lorien for his design is due, a knife that it's destroying the current standard of acceptable performance in the mind of one person at a time. A big part of it is the law of diminishing returns. CPK makes a knife that represents a value massively higher than it's asking price, based on what the current market competition is offering. I'm a big fan of CPK, and a big fan of many classic makers. When Nathan puts out a knife that is marketed and sold as "field grade" it's not meant to represent the peak of his craftsmanship. You will probably find many makers made knives that were not masterpieces.

Bob has shown me amazing pieces of human creation which represent tens of thousands of hours of hard earned craftsmanship and are truly an honor and privilege to admire. They demonstrate the pinnacle of human achievement in the field. But admire them is simply all I can afford to do.

Show me a knife as well executed as CPKs current offerings and as well priced, readily available and of equal performance and I am sure they have the same demand.

Oh, I don't own any Spydercos.
 
Last edited:
that was quite a read!
 
This still qualifies as one of the more useful and outstanding threads of late, thanks Steven.....though simply with a much more vigorous discussion - without harmful consequences. Kev, sorry you won the smiley face award, LOL.
 
This still qualifies as one of the more useful and outstanding threads of late, thanks Steven.....though simply with a much more vigorous discussion - without harmful consequences. Kev, sorry you won the smiley face award, LOL.

If people DON'T understand and heed the discussion through ignorance or ego.....harm will be done.

I have tried, over my many years of BFC participation to bring something of value, not just be a fanboy or cheerleader.

It has been the participation of Forumites like you, Joe P., Lorien, Kevin Jones, Dawkwind...and many not mentioned that have made the initial posits of value and enduring importance.

None of us exists in a vacuum, no matter how we perceive things.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson
 
[video=youtube;pSg_6T8HrRg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSg_6T8HrRg[/video]
 
Going back to demographics and economics, I'd like to make a few very important points.

First, demographics are the single most important driver of major secular macro-economic trends. Period.

Second, we are now at a point where a combination of demographic shifts and global debt levels will spell ruin for many businesses, individuals, economies and governments over the coming decades. Period.

Global debt levels (consumer debt, corporate debt, and government debt) have risen to unsustainable levels, while the rate of growth in the number of new workers and new consumers is declining rapidly. Productivity has also fallen.

In the countries most acutely impacted by these demographic and debt issues, some or all of the following must occur:
-Taxes must rise substantially in order to service the rising debts and cover growing entitlement costs
-Government expenditures must decline meaningfully - this will include salaries, healthcare, and pension benefits for government employees and dependents
-Inflation must rise, so as to erode the value of outstanding debts
-Governments must default on at least some of their obligations (state and local government bonds, state and local government pension funds, social security perhaps?)

Again, some or all of the above must occur. This is not opinion but a mathematical certainty. Some of it is occurring now, but there will be far, far more to come. The spending, saving,and investment habits of many informed consumers are already beginning to adapt to this reality, but many more still don't fully understand the true implications of above 100% debt to GDP ratios amid aging populations and slowing productivity growth. Not to sound alarmist, but in some places it will spell complete economic collapse (see Venezuela, Greece, and Cyprus... Puerto Rico, Illinois, and many others are quickly on the way...)

Shoot, I have to run to a meeting. More later...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top