Strider Knives, Game Over!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Look at the DD214 posted on Pownetwork, The last name is all Caps as opposed to the rest of the name. The O also dosn't match any other typed capitol O's on the page. the rest of the letters are to fuzzy to tell. Maby the clerk was having a bad day and hit the 0 instead of O.
 
No one ever heard Duane say it, all we know is what we have read on the Net. Therefore, Duane has never said he was so he has nothing to prove, it's those that said he is that need to prove it Duane never said he was, Blah Blah Blah.

The article in Tactical Knives states that the information was provided by directly interviewing Duane Dwyer. Many posts back I asked if someone could let me know if there was an issue of Tactical Knives in which the information provided in the article on Duane was retracted or corrected. No one came forward. So from what I can gather, it was Duane himself that made all the claims that were in that article.
 
Sort of interesting side note as listed on the blackfive site.

You can go to military.com, register, and do a buddy finder search.

If you search for Thomas D Poland, nothing comes back. If you search for Thomas Dwyer you get quite a few hits. And no, none show a sniper MOS. But it does highlight the discrepancies in the records. POWnetwork has records for a Poland but there are none on Military .com.

My stuff is correct and I got out in early 95. They show my father in there and he got in 70ish.

Anyone here who has been in the military can check their own name and see how accurate it is.

I do find it odd that it shows a Thomas Dywer though and not Thomas Poland.


Which means there could be another D2214.
 
So Spark, what do you think Bubba's intentions were in starting this thread? Were his intentions righteous or was it done to personally attack Duane Dwyer?

I am neither Spark nor Bubba, but I will offer this conjecture:

I think what we are seeing here is the standard response of certain veteran groups who object to people making themselves out to be more than they are. I seriously suspect (but do not know) that this all started as a result of someone getting their knickers in a knot over Duane's supposedly false claims of sniperhood. Similarly, I suspect that the objective is almost certainly not the financial ruination of Strider Knives. The fact that certain anti-Strider partisans are crowing "we told you so" should not obscure the fact that this veterans' group believes that they have uncovered another fake.

So yes, I think it was a personal attack, but having nothing to do with his current profession. I suspect that his status as a knifemaker is secondary to the fact that he is relatively well-known. This type of publicity helps the anti-faker crowd with their mission, regardless of its merits as far as the knife industry goes.

I have to admit that I don't get too worked up over exaggerated claims of derring-do. It seems to be an integral part of human nature to want to embellish our past. My own military service was comprised of little that could be considered dangerous beyond consigning billions of U-235 atoms to their atomic deaths (i.e., I sat in a relatively air-conditioned control room and watched over the reactors on Enterprise). Nobody ever seems to want to make a false claim about being a Nuke.

Rick
 
Uh, Yugoslavia didn't start breaking up until 1991. When does Duane claim to have left the military? There were no US Observers anywhere in the Balkans until 1991 at the earliest. Prior to that Yugoslavia and the Republics that were part of it were Communist countries.
 
I am not aware of what is going on behind the scene but I am sure there is an agenda. There seems to be certain people who surface whenever one of the Strider guys is being flogged on one of the forums. There is always one or two that tell us that those that still have doubts have their heads up their butts and that they have all the facts BUT they cannot tell us just yet...DUH
We are told that they have all kinds of proof and we must take their words that [insert Duane or Mick's name here] is a wannabe phoney, period.

Why can't one of these guys just post all they know if what they know is the truth. In this country there are no legal ramifications if what's said/written is truthful.

Or maybe it's not a lawsuit they fear and worry about.....................
 
I am neither Spark nor Bubba, but I will offer this conjecture:

I think what we are seeing here is the standard response of certain veteran groups who object to people making themselves out to be more than they are. I seriously suspect (but do not know) that this all started as a result of someone getting their knickers in a knot over Duane's supposedly false claims of sniperhood. Similarly, I suspect that the objective is almost certainly not the financial ruination of Strider Knives. The fact that certain anti-Strider partisans are crowing "we told you so" should not obscure the fact that this veterans' group believes that they have uncovered another fake.

So yes, I think it was a personal attack, but having nothing to do with his current profession. I suspect that his status as a knifemaker is secondary to the fact that he is relatively well-known. This type of publicity helps the anti-faker crowd with their mission, regardless of its merits as far as the knife industry goes.

I have followed this for a while and there have been to many comment buy the anti Strider ( aS) crowd to say the goal of this is not their business. One of the key players’ wives said something to the effect of" How will this affect your overseas business" and the title of this very tread is “Strider Knives Game over". The aS types have made numerous comments like that over the years. The fact that they drag every person who has every stopped by the Strider booth into this shows it’s not just about Duane or Mick.


You can go on the POWnetwork and look up a guy named Tommy Taylor. You can look at the newspaper article and see how quickly his storey unraveled. The time line is like February to May and that is while waiting on his local agency. A bunch of knuckle draggers got that done in about four months with no help from anybody and you mean to tell me that a dark genius and a martial arts instructor/bodyguard can’t get something done in going on 8 years. I will say it again, they got some good questions but the years of jealousy have ate them up enough that they just can’t seem to get anything done. The huge post here that was deleted is an outstanding example. It was a big huge look at me look at me cry.
 
I am not aware of what is going on behind the scene but I am sure there is an agenda. There seems to be certain people who surface whenever one of the Strider guys is being flogged on one of the forums. There is always one or two that tell us that those that still have doubts have their heads up their butts and that they have all the facts BUT they cannot tell us just yet...DUH
We are told that they have all kinds of proof and we must take their words that [insert Duane or Mick's name here] is a wannabe phoney, period.

Why can't one of these guys just post all they know if what they know is the truth. In this country there are no legal ramifications if what's said/written is truthful.

Or maybe it's not a lawsuit they fear and worry about.....................
[emphasis added]
Pardon. Mr. Strider formally admitted in court that his claims of combat and special ops experience were not accurate. This admission was consistent with his published military records.

This thread is about Mr. Dwyer. IF he is the Marine Poland whose record we have seen, he was not a sniper or combat vet of any sort UNLESS the record is fake OR his deeds and MOS are unrecorded on the record.

As for talk of suits for defamation (and consistent with your comment), in such a suit the burden of proving the falsity of the statements alleged to be defamatory is on the plaintiff -- the person claiming to have been defamed. So Mr. Dwyer would have to convince the jury that he was, in fact, a Marine sniper, combat vet, killer of multiple enemies of the U.S., and trainer of elite military units -- regardless of who made those claims.
 
William Hazen along with many other Rangers and other known military personnel have since been banned off SOCNET, Mick continues to blah blah blah, any mention of the connection between Sharky and Lakis will have you banned instantly off SOCNET. Maybe Hazen or some others would care to comment about that but this was/is a very big bed with many pink elephants wearing ghillie suits hidden in plain sight. About me? Im nobody, dont know anything.

Well I must admit I didn’t read through your whole post. I was rereading another part of the tread and just read your whole post.

I was not on SOCNET in 01 and even now I don’t post there a bunch, but Sharky does post on the ArmRanger.com forum and I talk to him now and then on certain matters. So I got some questions sent his way about his take on this.
 
I have to admit that I don't get too worked up over exaggerated claims of derring-do. It seems to be an integral part of human nature to want to embellish our past. My own military service was comprised of little that could be considered dangerous beyond consigning billions of U-235 atoms to their atomic deaths (i.e., I sat in a relatively air-conditioned control room and watched over the reactors on Enterprise). Nobody ever seems to want to make a false claim about being a Nuke.

Rick


maybe you could design a knife for guys that sit in a/c'd rooms watching reactors on ships to carry.

we could market it as having been designed by an actual Nuke. that should draw the attention of all those Nukes sitting in the shadows waiting for someone to recognize that they, too, need a good knife.



:p
 
Well I must admit I didn’t read through your whole post. I was rereading another part of the tread and just read your whole post.

I was not on SOCNET in 01 and even now I don’t post there a bunch, but Sharky does post on the ArmRanger.com forum and I talk to him now and then on certain matters. So I got some questions sent his way about his take on this.

You may want to let people know you are already posting on SOCNET and your post was edited by a MOD right off the bat. The mere mention of Lance Harris over there as you did almost got you banned instantly and got his name edited. I wouldn't bother with this but I believe you should at least be honest, maybe you guys "Horned Toad & Sharky" can get your stories straight in PMs before you post next time or does that imply conspiracy?

I already showed where Sharky was using Gary Lakis to prove people are the real deal, BEEN THERE, DONE THAT! It does seem to be a bizarre world they operate in or should I say moderate in? They are well known for very heavy moderation, deleting posts, chopping up threads to reflect whatever they want in order to prove they know it all, are the final answer on military questions. There is a undeniable connection between SOCNET and Lakis or should I say Gunny Lakis as Sharky liked to refer to him when he was the VP of the USMC Scout Sniper Association's and was getting VIP treatment as SOCNETs #1 verified sniper, but those threads are all deleted accept for the odd few and most likely will never be seen again by anyone.


By the way there are some good people on SOCNET, this is no disgrace for the users there as its a very large group of people, It just doesn't say much for the moderation or help prove they are the background experts they claim to be, more likely they are a close group of friends who don't want to admit when they are wrong so they edit and delete.

http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/showthread.php?t=75137

Old Yesterday, 13:13
Horned Toad Horned Toad is offline
Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cochise County,AZ
Posts: 54
Just an FYI but one of the main folks in the accusations against Duane D had this to say today


Mod edit:
I know you are trying to inform everyone. The guy who posted this knew socnet was corrupt 7 yrs ago?....but he was the one banned. Unlike other sites this site does not run sales or is owned by a company selling stuff. We don't care what others do or say but it's always interesting to see how they behave. We know exactly who this poster is and why he was banned. It wasn't for telling the truth and it wasn't because he was the real deal "warrior" as he states. Good for him, he can continue to rein as the King of Delusionville.

Out

__________________
Speak English or DIE
Last edited by Silverbullet : Yesterday at 13:30.
 
Yesterday, 13:18
Silverbullet's Avatar
Silverbullet Silverbullet is offline
Been There Done That

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: VA
Posts: 3,830
He is known by a number of people as are the knives.

His bio is what is being questioned. It appears the Association gave a negative response. What is needed is someone to confirm or deny his bio.

If his bio is accurate then this should be put to rest. If it isn't then it needs to be put to rest that way as well. Uncle J has served this nation honorably and I don't have a problem with him asking. I'm just tired of seeing others who never wore a uniform beating the drum, especially since a few of them appear to be blowhards, themselves.

Thanks

#5
Old Yesterday, 13:29
Horned Toad Horned Toad is offline
Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cochise County,AZ
Posts: 54
Quote:


I will go as far as to say there are probably some valid questions there, but I would be careful on who I buddied up with on this one. Since the quote I put up shows what they think of folks.
__________________

Speak English or DIE


I'm left wondering who really has the agenda? My agenda is simple, get to the facts, the Who? What? Where? When? Why? If people are liars and use military fraud for financial gain they should be called on it. If you make claims and references in magazines, advertisements, and while drinking and you have people going all over the net claiming your Special Operations, or any number of high profile military specialties you should be able to back your shit up with verifiable DOD paperwork, not credentialed by other secret squirrels who tell others to go away if they ask the wrong questions.

The POW Network is the #1 resource on the internet for military frauds and phonies, anyone can contact them and dispute any of this but isn't that the point, the people in question have no comment, blah blah blah blah blah! Witchhunt, blah blah blah blah! Been There Done That, blah blah blah blah, hang out with people, blah blah blah!


If anyone has any valid documents to dispute anything thats been posted feel free to show everyone, I will be waiting, possibly for a very long time.
 
I can't speak for his intentions, as I am not psychic. Clearly he has a burr under his saddle about this. Reading over his posts, it would appear that he has a vested interest in making sure the developments of this are made known; why I cannot say and am not going to speculate on.

It is interesting that many of the people who are the first to raise torches & pitchforks are now scrambling to defend, deny, obfuscate, misdirect, scapegoat, excuse, and otherwise claim that the elephant isn't in the room, but that's not really anything new.

Perhaps you can enlighten us all as to what intentions someone would have about deliberately & repeatedly misleading people about the nature of their military service? Or why some people just can't stop themselves from doing it?

folks ususally lie about there background (military or otherwise) due to self esteem issues, or to try and advance there cause, whatever the cause may be.


the body armor issues lance speaks of imho are the issues mclung (mad dog knives) brought up about the new vests not performing as advertised on his forum tacticalforums.com, a few yrs. back IIRC, and i suppose mclung was in the right on that one (a clock which doesnt run is right 2X a day) but anyway i imagine thats what he is speaking of, mclung also has had issues with SKI for quite some time now, IIRC it all started about kerambits if ya can believe that lol (wow, am i in the know or what lol????).

somehow the fact that there are a lot of posers on the net doesnt suprise me.

i still dont know what to think about all this, "if it looks like a duck" does come to mind though.

like i have said before folks who lie/fabricate military exploits are the lowest scum imho, hell my dad was in italy in WW2 and i would wager he saw as much combat as anybody (88th inf div) and he rarely spoke of it other than about the few times they had fun times, its been my experience thats the way most real vets are, if someone is lieing here, shame on them, they really should consider getting some mental help with there issues imho.

still havent made up my mind on this issue 100%, but must say it dont look good, it doesnt help that i wonder what some folks agendas are on this matter.

i do think this whole thing is one helluva messy bunch of crap for the folks involved, imho anyway, and they should straighten things up ASAP if they can. if they cant?? i guess we'll see WTF if thats the case.
 
You may want to let people know you are already posting on SOCNET and your post was edited by a MOD right off the bat. The mere mention of Lance Harris over there as you did almost got you banned instantly and got his name edited. I wouldn't bother with this but I believe you should at least be honest, maybe you guys "Horned Toad & Sharky" can get your stories straight in PMs before you post next time or does that imply conspiracy?


And why should I tell everyone where I post on the internet. Before anyone takes what I said out of context. My main concern is not that they are looking at Duane’s background but that if they do don’t go trusting Lance and Kevin on anything they say. Are very own Spark knows what happens when you send a PM to Kevin. Happened in the last big thread, Kevin posted PMs all over the place about what they were talking about. So if Socnet wants to go digging great, but do it on their own. Same thing with the Tommy Taylor case, that get mentioned on tactical forums and Kevin is like" let me call POWNET" and he had what to do with that, nothing.

You also failed to mention that the thread on Duane’s bio is still open and all they did was delete Lances bio.
 
Are very own Spark knows what happens when you send a PM to Kevin. Happened in the last big thread, Kevin posted PMs all over the place about what they were talking about.

Just as a courtesy, please differentiate between myself, Kevin Schlossberg (Spark) and Kevin McClung (MadDog) - I haven't been posting private messages or emails, and don't want people to be confused as to who-is-who.

My main concern is not that they are looking at Duane’s background but that if they do don’t go trusting Lance and Kevin on anything they say.
For that matter, don't trust me, or anyone else "just because" - VERIFY all information. Hard documentation from public & official records trumps any "trust me" or "I know this guy."

"My brother's sister's cousin's uncle's friend says he's good to go" is not a Class Date, or hard MOS or records from the NPRC. I haven't, and won't, ask anyone just to "take my word for it" on anything here; I'm not even going to speculate on things. Gather the facts, review the information, and make your own decision.

I don't understand this Body Armor tangent, honestly. What does that have to do with this? If nothing, then why is it being brought up? (In other words, stay on subject)
 
And why should I tell everyone where I post on the internet. Before anyone takes what I said out of context. My main concern is not that they are looking at Duane’s background but that if they do don’t go trusting Lance and Kevin on anything they say. Are very own Spark knows what happens when you send a PM to Kevin. Happened in the last big thread, Kevin posted PMs all over the place about what they were talking about. So if Socnet wants to go digging great, but do it on their own. Same thing with the Tommy Taylor case, that get mentioned on tactical forums and Kevin is like" let me call POWNET" and he had what to do with that, nothing.

You also failed to mention that the thread on Duane’s bio is still open and all they did was delete Lances bio.



Whats your point? Anybody can send a name to POW Network, (Maddog) Kevin is nobody special there and has nothing to do with who does or does not get listed as a phony. If your walking through the mall and some guy tries to sell you mop-n-glow and says he is a former Special Operations as part of the sales pitch you should check it out, trust but verify. This problem is going to get bigger and bigger with more Vets back home and looking for jobs to feed their kids.

Two guys want a job, one is a Combat Vet, one is not, who you going to hire? Now you find out the man is not a Combat Vet, who you gonna fire?

The problem here is people are taking it so personal, hey people lie, thats what people do sometimes, some people lie when there is no need to do it. If Buck Knives wants to advertise a knife made by former Special Operations personnel they damm sure will be checking DOD Paperwork in the future, this is the end of, "I saw them hanging out with BLAH BLAH BLAH! They are the real deal!" VERIFICATIONS!


Please remember that Gary Lakis himself at one time was who verified personnel over at SOCNET for Mick Strider and who knows how many other people. Gary Lakis was the man, now he is a known as a total fraud, The 66 million dollar phony! Maybe this will help some people remember something?

http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/showthread.php?t=9480

SOCNET SOCNET STORE | SUPPORT SOCNET

Go Back SOCNET: The SpecialOperations.com Bulletin Board > Areas of Expertise > Sniping / Sharpshooting
Reload this Page Scout/Sniper Symposium, 5 Aug, Cam Pen

User Name Remember Me?
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Go to Page...
Reply

Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
Old 26 July 2000, 02:21
Gary

Posts: n/a
Scout/Sniper Symposium, 5 Aug, Cam Pen
There will be a Sniper Symposium 1600 Aug 5 at SOI Cam Pen (1 Mar Div Scout/Sniper School Auditorium), Cost is $5. Uniform is Cammies. This is open to all current and former Snipers, Service men and especially Commanders. There will be speeches by some of the most notable Scout/Snipers alive today to include Chuck Mawhinney, Moose Ferran, MSgt. Neil Morris as well as others. There will be discussions and displays for all. This is an opportunity for command to see what the Scout/Sniper is and what they can do. There will be a Beer/Wine free for all immediately following the Symposium at the SOI Bunker.

Semper Fi.
GySgt. Gary A. Lakis
V.P. USMC Scout/Sniper Association http://www.MarineScoutSniper.com
 
http://www.cagw.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8007


Military Dud Shames DOD
Friday, July 23, 2004
By: Joshua Chang

Wastewatcher, July 2004

Despite heightened alert levels for the nation, the Department of Defense (DOD) has failed to apply the same caution to running background checks on some of its own contractors. After the September 11 attacks, the Pentagon awarded a former marine, Sgt. Gary Lakis, a $66 million contract to enhance security at Navy bases on the West Coast. Unfortunately, DOD failed to detect in its background investigation that Sgt. Lakis lied and falsified his credentials.



For years Lakis had been deceiving others with his fantasy military career.
He attended veterans' reunions decked out in medals and had his office walls covered in awards. His resume made him a self-proclaimed hero who received silver stars, bronze stars, air medals, and purple hearts obtained in special operations in Panama and Somalia. Yet in his 10 years of service, he had no record of combat. It turns out his medals were nothing more than store-bought trinkets. Ironically, as a member of the Scout/Sniper Association, Lakis was used as a source to confirm phony veterans at www.phonyveterans.com.



Dick Sasser, a former Marine veteran who was a member of a genuine elite special operations unit, described Lakis the best: "All he was, was nothing but a dirty liar and a phony."



Sgt. Lakis owned Surgical Shooting Inc. (SSI), a company offering training for police, SWAT, and military special operations units in sniping, marksmanship, and tactical techniques. SSI was granted a $66 million contract to help teach Marines and sailors how to track and take on terror threats.



Despite his "expertise," Sgt. Lakis never administered any of the training and was hardly at the training facility in Honolulu, Hawaii. His employees soon became suspicious about how he attained his decorations. They found out that Lakis was not the experienced veteran he played out to be and turned him in to the Navy.



Rick Sweeney, who served in the Special Forces and was SSI's chief of operations stated, "We had all pretty much heard about his qualifications and I was fairly embarrassed by his performance." The Navy cancelled the contract and Lakis fled the country. Since then, SSI has closed down. The FBI and the DOD have opened a criminal investigation into Lakis and how the contract was awarded.



An incident like this should be a wake-up call for DOD to pay attention to the details of its background checks. It is even more distressing to be reminded that it is the citizens' hard-earned dollars at work running the Pentagon. The credibility of the government is at risk and the trust Americans have with the government holding their money is fading. With a budget of $401.7 billion, the Pentagon has to be more accountable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top