Strider Knives, Game Over!

Status
Not open for further replies.
THAT is how you admit a mistake publicly, and move on.:thumbup:

Thanks for coming on BladeForums, Sharky.....really sorry you got dragged into this.....and relating this story of a determined scumbag who helped to sully the reputation of good men, by deceipt and lies....may he suffer in the way he has made others suffer....at the hands of a con-man's tricks, and may he burn in Hell for bringing disquiet to the Corps.

Best Regards,

STeven Garsson

What he said. ;).
 
This is not about Sharky, he is the real deal.

let's get back to the topic here and that's whether Duane is the real deal also.

Time for the "other half of the story", this half has run it's course...............
 
It's coming...SOON :D

SOCNET STAFF and I have spoken.


They will make a statement shortly on their site regarding me and that I was not the person at all.


Sharky375's statement is correct regarding the mistaken identity and my name.

There were issues discussed I WILL NOT elaborate. I'm NOT going to be CRYPTIC, ONLY factual at this point.


My perception WAS correct. There were some issues in the PAST that created this perception and that has been worked out and rectified.


Additionally, I have been assured and satisfied that SOCNET will be a VALID/VIABLE PROFESSIONAL source and content for the future.

Watch and see...

PERIOD.
 
When was it determined that John Doe was undeniably fake? And more importantly, by who?

Please see Sharky's reply for undeniable proof when institutions with actual investigative power start digging from the right sources. In my opinion, there is a difference between the (again, in my opinion) incomplete information present in this thread and Sharky's example. And that is what I have been saying all along.

Myself, as an active duty soldier, I don't care enough to give a hoot if all this is some fake/poser stuff said in those horridly corrupted internet websites. If something along the lines of Sharky's case comes up then it's a different story.

I don't see as big a difference between the two as you apparently do. Look again at the documents posted on POW. "Data Systems Tech" look again at the quotes by Mick himself and how one says one thing and one another. I don't see how anyone cannot notice.

Originally posted by Flip8> Further to that, I've never understood the mindset that a whole profession should ever feel the shame for the actions of an individual, regardless of what that individual had done.

Good points all but for the record this is not what I said or meant so if thats what came across it is not my intent. My feelings are for the people they slap in the face insulting with their actions and words and for those that died doing what they pretended to do. I could give a turd about the posers personally. :)

Also it was not my intention to insinuate that the entire support base or friend base or even a small part of it was laughing in the face of the real hero veterans out there. I speak about the posers blatantly laughing in the face of the real deal veterans by their posing. I did not say anything to indicate that the masses were responsible for this to my knowledge.

Are you telling me you would not feel a bit of disqust toward the poser that gets caught in his lies and deception? Thats all I meant.

STR
 
I don't see as big a difference between the two as you apparently do. Look again at the documents posted on POW. "Data Systems Tech" look again at the quotes by Mick himself and how one says one thing and one another. I don't see how anyone cannot notice.

Good points all but for the record this is not what I said or meant so if thats what came across it is not my intent. My feelings are for the people they slap in the face insulting with their actions and words and for those that died doing what they pretended to do. I could give a turd about the posers personally. :)

Also it was not my intention to insinuate that the entire support base or friend base or even a small part of it was laughing in the face of the real hero veterans out there. I speak about the posers blatantly laughing in the face of the real deal veterans by their posing. I did not say anything to indicate that the masses were responsible for this to my knowledge.

Are you telling me you would not feel a bit of disqust toward the poser that gets caught in his lies and deception? Thats all I meant.

STR

Please add the posters name on the second quote. Thanks.
 
Lance please don't be crytic :rolleyes:

You have talked in circles throughout this entire thread. You may have explained everything we need to know but you lost me at your first...................PERIOD.

If you could dumb it down so a small Town NH hick whose only foray into the world of violence was watching a dog get hit by a car could understand it would be appreciated.

I don't understand the world of snipers, spec ops, heroes and warriors so PLEASE speak slower!!!!! Thanks
 
here is the link:

http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/showthread.php?p=959989#post959989

and unredacted contents of that post : Today, 16:35


Silverbullet
Been There Done That Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: VA
Posts: 3,839

Quote:
Mod edit:
I know you are trying to inform everyone. The guy who posted this knew socnet was corrupt 7 yrs ago?..

Out


==============================================================================================


"Funny how things fly around the internet. My comments were not about Lance Harris. As far as I remember his name was not even included in the text of what was posted. The person, I thought the quote came from, knows who he is. He's a professional internet trouble starter.

===============================================================================================

Those of you who are trying to make this something that it isn't need to take a deep breath and get a grip. Keep the issue focused on what it actually is.

For some of you this may be the highlight of your week. To me the issue is honor and accountability, not internet drama. Dwyer either is what he says he is or he isn't. My offer to him stands.

===============================================================================================

I will state that based on a number of bits of info that I've been made privy to that in my opinion he is not or was not ever a Scout Sniper 8541. I am prepared to be neutral about it and keep an open mind if he decides to surface and provide me the proof and publically retract my statement.

I am also prepared to use my 30 yrs worth of USMC contacts to ensure that no one who lies about his bio is involved with anything the Corps does. That includes his associates, like PR. So if Dwyer is reading this take me up on my offer and put this to bed."

Out


PERIOD.
 
Looks like the big guns are going to bring this to a conclusion. These are the cream of the crop in the USMC Scout/Sniper world so if Dwyer is what he claims he is, these guys will corroborate his history. If not, well................

I would think a guy with Dwyer's impressive kill count and impressive training would be a well known to these guys. But in his defense I have no clue how the Military Spec-OP world operates and who knows what, etc. In my world, a Sniper is someone who steals my high bid on E-bay for a pocket knife!!

Oh my real name: Walter Mitty!!!:p:p:D
 
Looks like the big guns are going to bring this to a conclusion. These are the cream of the crop in the USMC Scout/Sniper world so if Dwyer is what he claims he is, these guys will corroborate his history. If not, well................

I would think a guy with Dwyer's impressive kill count and impressive training would be a well known to these guys. But in his defense I have no clue how the Military Spec-OP world operates and who knows what, etc. In my world, a Sniper is someone who steals my high bid on E-bay for a pocket knife!!

Oh my real name: Walter Mitty!!!:p:p:D

Second that!:thumbup: Actually you would think at least a couple of guys that served with him and knew him personally from the service would be members of his forum, buyers of his knives and supporters saying yeah, I served with him and I know what he did but thats not what we get. Even that would be better than what we have seen though. At least then someone that was actually stationed with him in the same unit or platoon or whatever it was called could offer something more substantial. I mean think about this. I was a dental tech. in the service and guys I was serving with that also liked knives have found me and I'm not anywhere near as exposed or 'celebrity' to the public like both these guys are. Also, I think being Marines its even more likely that some of the guys he served with would like knives too.

Still. I'm not holding my breath that the 'big guns' are going to be able to do much though because its all up to what Duane wants to do or doesn't want to do. I hope I'm wrong because it would be very nice to know once and for all with no BS or third party hearsay.

STR
 
It's coming...SOON :D

SOCNET STAFF and I have spoken.


They will make a statement shortly on their site regarding me and that I was not the person at all.


Out of the two I know which one I will believe. So I think I will sit tight and see which way the axe falls. I do think the guys at SOCNET have the resources to bring this to a conclusion pretty quickly.

I also find you newfound respect for SOCNET amusing though. You have known they were corrupt since 01 but a simple email could have cleared all that up. How many people have you told that to in the last 7 years? Are you going to go back and apologize for your blanket statements that were based on faulty perception? What made for better drama, an email to clean up the facts or telling people that you were in the know?
 
Lakis had convinced Carl to make his (Lakis') wife (a former stripper, go figure) 51% owner of SSI so that a female owned company could get a leg up on contract bids.

IIRC, Strider Knives is also a female-owned company.
 
It matters to those involved and no one who was involved in it contacted POWnet, it was a 3rd party trying to act like he was connected. When we have the FBI lined up to investigate this guy we really don’t need someone else rechecking our work thank you.

Have you tried to run any type of investigation on Dwyer? If you have experience with this sort of thing can you use your resources to get to the bottom of this? Have you posted any positive findings you've made and I just missed it?
 
Have you tried to run any type of investigation on Dwyer? If you have experience with this sort of thing can you use your resources to get to the bottom of this? Have you posted any positive findings you've made and I just missed it?

No I haven’t. We have a timeline of Rangers from the late 60s to now. That we can deal with. SOCNET has way more resources for this that we ever do and to most are going to be a neutral third party. It seems this has now got the attention of the Scout Sniper community and they are going to deal with it.
 
Is it tune in or stay tuned??

I am glad that I live a simple life and to me being a POSER is lying during deer season and claiming the 87 pound spike horn I shot was a 14 point 285 pound beast and the fish I caught was that big!!!
Over 1300 posts on over 30 pages, BFC being read by folks all over the place whose experience with knives is cutting a steak and think S30V is a Volvo:eek::D!! They are here because of their interest in this thread and this thread only. I have seen some names lurking here that have not been here in a long long time, there's a world of interest on the outcome; this is a big freaking deal!!!

I have zero military experience so bear with me and help me thru a couple of questions; Is there/are there different Snipers in the USMC? Are there Snipers, Scout Snipers, other types of Snipers so that one group may not know the other? And of course the big question on my mind, if someone had the level of training Dwyer says he had and if someone had an "impressive kill count" wouldn't it be considered suspicious that no one in the USMC Sniper world know the guy?

And to any of the real deals who have taken an interest here; if you were being called a fake, a phony, a scammer and a Poser at this level (probably more than 75,000 have peaked at this) would you remain silent and ask your Buds to do the same? Would your Buds suggest and "coach" you to stay silent and would you truly listen?

I didn't think so...................................:foot:
 
attachment.php

I have an idea! Let's all talk about each other and forget whatever this discussion was about!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top