Kevin, my point once again is that you do not decide for the general public what is or is not combat service. Many people around the world have seen combat without the auspicious blessing of DOD, have done so, and will continue to do so.
Please don't mischaracterize what I had to say. If you are implying that Mick Strider is some sort of combat vet, provide proof of it and back up that assertation. Otherwise "hypothetical" "maybe" "kinda" "what if" scenarios don't prove a thing. His
military record shows he isn't one. His
military records also show he was never assigned to SOCOM or JSOC. His words and actions, however, don't match these facts.
It is a narrow interpretation of the situation, which characterizes the entire subject. The "Only I Can Be Right" viewpoint is certainly yours to express on your website. I does not constitute a fact, however, regardless of your insistence. It is only one more uninformed opinion, and speculative at best.

You know what, tirod, for someone who's posting history is almost completely based on defending Strider whenever there is a problem, saying that I have a "Only I Can Be Right" "narrow" viewpoint is pretty hypocritical.
Furthermore, for someone saying my opinion is only based on speculation, you seem to do a lot of implying, but very little "backing up" with "hard facts" - by all means, if you are going to say I'm wrong, provide something substantial other than "he coulda maybe possibly have done this, sorta" because the documentation shown thus far does a pretty fair job of exposing the misleading tactics he's employed to date. Any time data has come up contradicting what I've said, I've acknowledged it, addressed the information, and encouraged discussion. So don't lie and say I'm pushing anything.
It sure isn't hurting your subscription rate, as you point out, which opens speculation as to your motives, especially since you admit you offered financial incentives to some for furthering this agenda.
More speculation. Should I ask about your agenda, since a cursory glance at your posting history shows you seem to only arrive here to defend Strider when there is a problem? Or to push Strider related products? Should I ask you if you are being offered compensation?
I mention the number of new profiles signing up because it illustrates one thing: this is a popular site. If you are going to speculate causation or draw incorrect conclusions from that, that's
your problem, but it
does make you a giant hypocrite. By saying I have an
agenda, you ignore that I didn't start any of the Cold Steel controversy, nor did I force Mick Strider to tell his lies, nor did I force him to libel Chris Osman. The only time I even stepped into this is when I did research to find out more information, ironically just what Michelle suggested.
So please, if you are going to make claims about my
agenda, step up and do so. Spell it out instead of making snide allegations.
Of course, this was all discussed in the thread "Spark has crossed the line," which others can read about there, and elsewhere. Not being a combat vet, I will leave it to them to define what it is or isn't - I do not presume to decide for others what to call themselves.
Yep, and addressed there, which apparrently you ignored with your "Only I can be right" opinion. As for your lack of presumption, you've presumed mightily about me and my motives, yet you choose to ignore facts that don't tie into your beliefs. Pardon me, sir, but your viewpoints are contradictory.
But hey, tirod, maybe you can answer this for me: When is it ok to lie about your military career?