Yep, exactly why I recommended to OP to look into better option for the money. But have to say, the WT D2 looks like a very nice tactical fighter.
WT D2 6.5mm/0.25" thick and good overall heavy fighter, except for a major potential flaw
Would this thing break in use? Nah, unless you use it as a step ladder. Would it chips out in huge haft-moon shape? Nope, unless hard baton through a large twisty knot, which would mess-up tough blade as well. Would you buy it? Nil.
Beside the super important of design & geometry... Large blade dulling is mainly by deformation (dent,roll,chip,smush) not abrasion/wear. So optimal edge/steel would be sufficient+30% extra toughness and as strong as possible, thereby minimize the deformation size/magnitude when encounter damaging interactions. Wear resistance from carbide effectiveness increase as cutting stroke increase in draw/saw motion.
BCMW/my ht is quite different from normal ht. From demonstrated videos, clearly ht played a big role... Insightful mind would see the performance gap between D2 & M4 is actually not that large, when ht is very good.
When makers/ht-services use normal/industry/mfg-recommend ht protocol, certain steels are designed for easy to get good(not excellent) outcome. Cruwear/zwear/pd1, 4v, vanadis4e, m4, etc around 61rc would be quite strong and plenty of toughness for large blades. Coated low Cr% steels (W2, 52100, 80CrV2, 1084, 1075, ...) are good, plus super easy for field sharpening.
Bottom line - if you are looking for a durable high performing large blade, do a little more research/reading. Otherwise, buy + enjoy (life is short) and just consider first couple big purchases as learning experience...