Posted by E_WOK:
Who are you?
Last time I checked. . .
GigOne.
Posted by E_WOK:
Why all the hatred for us?
See page 2 dude.
Posted by GigOne:
Ive done business with TAD in the past. . .and I think that you guys rock !
Absolutely no "hatred."
While I've enjoyed doing business with TAD and think that TAD rocks. . .that doesn't mean that I
will or have to agree with issues that I perceive in error. May that be TAD or anyone else !
Posted by VoodooSan:
For days now, people have been accusing TAD of poor business practices, whether those practices were indifference to the loss a customer sustained, lack of knowledge as to how to conduct their affairs, lack of knowledge as to how the USPS works, lack of care in following up on a difficult situation or, in the case of one post, collusion with another forum. And yet, when I post information that I believe has a direct bearing on the entire situation, and voice MY opinion as to the significance of that information, its a cheap shot??
No where in this thread has anyone implied or insinuated that TAD was a thief, crook, rip-off artist(s), etc.
Yes, there are posts that don't agree with how
PS was taken care of.
Yes, there are posts that do agree with how
PS was taken care of.
Amazing concept. . .for a
discussion forum.
See the difference. . .between disagreeing on a particular subject. . . and. . .insinuating or implying that someone is or could be a
THIEF !
Posted by VoodooSan:
And yet, when I post information that I believe has a direct bearing on the entire situation, and voice MY opinion as to the significance of that information, its a cheap shot??
A direct bearing ? Where is your
PROOF ?
There is a substantial difference between offering an opinion on a subject. . .and implying/insinuating that someone is or could be a thief !
Posted by VoodooSan:
You don't find it the least bit suspicious that the same person, ordering two different knives, a year apart, had BOTH of them go missing in transit?
No suspicions here.
Yet. . .with the
ENORMOUS amount of
PROOF that you're offering

makes him a
thief ?
ROTFLMAO
Let's see. . .
could it be a coincidence ?
Posted by VoodooSan:
You don't find it at all suspicious that the buyer's FIRST posts to public forums were accusatory, beleaguered and pleading, rather than conciliatory and straightforward?
Lost me. His first post on this forum ?

Are you sure that you're talking about BFC ?
PS joined BFC in Nov '01 and has 217 posts (to date). Here is his first post on this forum.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=178349
He has posted in
GB&U in the past but I've only seen good comments - by him and towards him. If I'm wrong. . .please post the thread(s) that you're referring to.
Are you sure that you're talking about BFC ? Suspicious.
Posted by VoodooSan:
You don't find it the least bit suspicious that PS felt it necessary, in both posts, to not-too-subtly tug at everyone's heartstrings by pointing out that he's a soldier serving his country far from home, rather than simply stating the facts of the deal?
No. . .but that's me.
But, how is it suspicious ?
Posted by VoodooSan:
You don't find it the least bit suspicious that he found it necessary to point out, in his second post, that he'd been off studying for college exams (another not-too-subtle heartstring tug, IMO), to explain his absence? (Of course, when TAD didnt answer his e-mails promptly, because of their holiday closure he "won't buy the line that the New Years Eve holidays were the reason for not answering emails.")
No. . .but again. . that's me.
Curious as to how you came to believe that his being gone for 2 or 3 days is suspicious ?
Posted by VoodooSan:
You dont find it suspicious that he found it necessary to bring the USN ban into play, and accuse TAD and the USN Administrators of some sort of collusion?
Not suspicious.
"I also posted this very same thread on the Usual Suspects Network Forums and I got banned immediately. No where in there rules did it state I couldn't complain about a particular retailer. This really shows me that TAD Gear and USN have some kind of drug deal going on."
Maybe not the best choice of words !
Could be that he interrupted it that way - he posts a thread and is immediately banned.
What took place. . .took place there. I don't know what took place. . .nor do I care to know.
But. . .how's that suspicious ?
Posted by VoodooSan:
I suppose a case could be made that I'm overly suspicious. . .
Naaahhhhh. . .how could anyone come to that conclusion ? If someone did. . .I'd be suspicious.
Posted by VoodooSan:
I stand by what I have written, facts, opinions and all.
You're choice and is very suspicious.
Calling or insinuating or implying that someone is a
thief. . .is a very substantial charge. . .especially when
SOMEONES "opinion" isn't based on ANY FACTS !
I pretty much equate your factual data to the person who says. . ."hey, watch me pull a rabbit outta my a$$."