The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Ignoring everything but the knife, it looks fugly and I doubt the steel is great. I'd rather get a Mora or a Becker.
All of the haters jumped on the boat too soon (bet didn't even read the post).To my eyes, this Ganzo looks like a copy or a mix between the Gerber BG knife and its previous incarnation, the non "Pro" version, which featured that full length tang. It makes me wonder if Gerber contracted the same factory in China to produce their BG knife as Ganzo uses for this knife.
Granted, the Gerber has more of a point and the Ganzo puts a strap-cutter on their sheath, and the grind on the Ganzo is higher. I would suspect that the quality is roughly the same for both the Gerber and the Ganzo.
The gerber is a far better knife in almost every way. It at least has a pointy end. Plus, Gerber isn't a crap clone company like ganzo. Nuff said.
Definitely wouldn't call this knife a counterfeit though.questionable global domination goals outside the realms of Wall Street and NASDAQ.
Ok, most of your post was too garbage to bother addressing but I have to call you out on the dumbest thing you posted...I have looked pretty deeply into this, and Ganzo holds well over 100 patents both in design, and in manufacturing processes.
Look into exactly who owns the "Axis Lock"...
You'll be shocked!
https://www.google.com/patents/US5737841
I don't think anyone is calling it counterfeit either. You continue to miss the point. You're supporting a company built upon design theft and cloning. Does the fact that Ganzo doesn't actually make "counterfeits" somehow redeem them?Lost me at
Definitely wouldn't call this knife a counterfeit though.
I am convinced those are in fact made in the same factory in China and from the same materials
The patent isn't for a hole it's for opening a blade in a certain way. I don't have the exact wording. But the hole is significant because they were the first to do it, its design means its a Spyderco. Sal worked with benchmade and they licensed it for the grips. Taking a hole and putting it in any other brand is just trying to make sales based off of spyderco design.Spydee owns a patent on a hole? Brilliant!
Simply amazing people would defend that. Same freaking logo!Awww, it even has the same little flame symbol on the blade.
Ok, most of your post was too garbage to bother addressing but I have to call you out on the dumbest thing you posted...
It's common knowledge among us knife knuts that Benchmade licenses the Axis lock from McHenry and Williams. You've heard of those dudes, haven't you? They're kind of a "thing" in the knife world. They've designed one or two...Maybe you need to go back and look a little more deeply at the patents you claim to have so much knowledge of...
Let's see all these ganzo patents you speak of. We need links.McHenrey/Williams...
Exactly my point sir.
Not Benchmade as a company
This is a common denominator in the business world. Licensing.
Ganzo as a corporation owns most of it's designs because they designed, and patented them in house.
They are not a sweat shop producing counterfeit knives. They are producing knives for brands, as well as their own products.
On topic... The rounded nose of the Ganzo survival knife may well be an innovation. Depending on how you look at it....
No tip to easily break off, and I'm sure you can drill a hole with it. Look back at one of the most highly prized military designs.
![]()
How many lives would you guess this knife saved or prolonged.
I see no drilling tip on this either.
I'm only stating that the makers of knives are making knives. no one here KNOWS what steel is used or not used, and no one here KNOWS what brands/styles Ganzo is licensed to make.
For all we know every knife they have produced may be legit. If not PROVE IT! Please.
They did not design the benchmade 940 yet they copied it. They did not design protec designs yet they copied it. Please tell me more about how you think they are legit.For all we know every knife they have produced may be legit. If not PROVE IT! Please.
You are beyond help. I don't need to prove that the Ganzo aren't legit because they arrived long after the knives they copied. The proof is self-evident. You're the one claiming that these clones are patented, original designs by Ganzo. That's the claim that needs to be supported, not the one borne upon common sense and the calendar.McHenrey/Williams...
Exactly my point sir.
Not Benchmade as a company
This is a common denominator in the business world. Licensing.
Ganzo as a corporation owns most of it's designs because they designed, and patented them in house.
They are not a sweat shop producing counterfeit knives. They are producing knives for brands, as well as their own products.
On topic... The rounded nose of the Ganzo survival knife may well be an innovation. Depending on how you look at it....
No tip to easily break off, and I'm sure you can drill a hole with it. Look back at one of the most highly prized military designs.
How many lives would you guess this knife saved or prolonged.
I see no drilling tip on this either.
I'm only stating that the makers of knives are making knives. no one here KNOWS what steel is used or not used, and no one here KNOWS what brands/styles Ganzo is licensed to make.
For all we know every knife they have produced may be legit. If not PROVE IT! Please.
The patent isn't for a hole it's for opening a blade in a certain way. I don't have the exact wording. But the hole is significant because they were the first to do it, its design means its a Spyderco. Sal worked with benchmade and they licensed it for the grips. Taking a hole and putting it in any other brand is just trying to make sales based off of spyderco design.
And it's not a patent, it's a trademark.
You're the one claiming that these clones are patented, original designs by Ganzo. That's the claim that needs to be supported, not the one borne upon common sense and the calendar.