- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,987
No, you are not going to jail by some automatic default because you used a knife on an unarmed person. A much younger person defending against a bigger older attacker, or an elderly person defensing against a much younger attacker. A woman defending against a male attacker. Check your legal resource and look up 'disparity of force'. Heck, you can even shoot someone if there is a disparity of force enough for legal cause. Travon Martin was shot and killed by George Zimmerman even though Martin was totally unarmed. The fact that he had Zimmerman down and was beating the dog snot out of him and was a bigger individual was the disparity of force. The only reason there was a trial was political pressure.
Standing by your comment doesn't change the fact that you are wrong. There has been a ton of people who have shot, stabbed, or clubbed unarmed persons and not been arrested.
I've both prosecuted and defended cases such as those you describe. You're not telling me anything I don't know. While it's getting a little tiresome to have to repeat - I know there are circumstances in which the use of a knife in self-defense is lawful, necessary, and (most importantly) unavoidable. Again - my point is that those circumstances are so incredibly rare that they do not outweigh the danger of the mindset that permits one to think "self-defense" when deciding to carry a knife. One would be immeasurably safer to have a mindset of avoidance and escape. Over and out.