The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I like bearings, until sand gets in them.
haven't run into that yet. I'll take your word on it.That and concrete dust is a bugger.
haven't run into that yet. I'll take your word on it.
I've used a bearing knife on cutting lots of ductboard and the glass fibers got packed in there pretty good but didn't stop working. had to clean it out after the end of the day as I could feel lagging from it.The concrete dust isn’t so bad, it’s when you start to sweat or the knife is subjected to condensation.Drywall dust is the same.
![]()
I've used a bearing knife on cutting lots of ductboard and the glass fibers got packed in there pretty good but didn't stop working. had to clean it out after the end of the day as I could feel lagging from it.
Perhaps you slept through your science classes ?direct evidence
I like the smooth, controlled action, and a lot of times at work, I’m not looking when I close the knife, so drop shut is not high on my list.
Evidence and proof are not the same thing. Perhaps you're the one that needs a refresher on science since that's a very simple mistake to make.Perhaps you slept through your science classes ?
I'm not questioning the veracity of this anecdotal evidence stated in OP .
But this is not a controlled study and is much too small a sample to "prove" or conclude anything at all about the general performance of washers vs bearings .
I run both fairly dry.Also, I’m curious to whether you ran the bearings dry and the pb with oil? Oil “attracts” dust.
Not questioning your finding, just wondering about variables. Also, could be an Emerson problem.![]()
Got to match the knife to the task...I like bearings, I like washers... If I like a knife, its built well, and functions well, I don't honestly care.
Did you see how the bearings were recessed deep into the frame of the knife and the washers were not?And yet here we have, as I've repeatedly pointed out, direct evidence of a washer pivot becoming difficult to open due to debris while a bearing pivot continued to perform.
Again, I don't see how the can't be interpreted as a clear performance advantage, which for some reason you deny seeing. If you're happy with the knives you have, that's great. Many people are entirely happy with blades made from 420HC and 1095, but denying that other steels offer performance advantages over those two is simply delusional. Obviously, I don't think this situation is nearly as cut and dry, but your refusal to accept direct evidence in front of you makes it seem as though you're more invested in defending the knives that you like from some imagined attack than actually assessing performance advantages.
I realize the difference. The terms “hard evidence” and proof are used interchangeably by people outside of science and math. The comparison made in this thread is useless unless you use bearings and washers in the same knife.You're incorrectly conflating evidence and proof. Proof requires evidence, but the two are not the same. This very much is hard evidence of a bearing pivot knife outperforming a washer pivot knife in a real world scenario. It's not proof that bearing pivots are inherently superior, which would be the claim you seem to think that I'm making.
It did in this case with these two knives.
Nylatron washers versus steel bearings in a Nylon (?) cage.
It seems to have allowed for compressed air to blast the grit away; the Nylatron washers on this knife fit with no visible gaps, but some grit got in there. Not much, but then the greater contact surface area touching the pivoting area seems to have worked against things, making it really, really gritty.
The pictures of the ZT 0561 are prior to washing, other than the blade.
Both knives managed to have most grit blown away along the way; that little bit in the pivot area affected those washers more than the bearings.
I strongly disagree. If we're going back to science we have to remember that controlled, double blind studies may be the gold standard, but given that there are many situations where such studies are impossible or unethical, observational studies are frequently used and no less important. This is a single data point, which means it's very far from definitive, but it allows us to examine the other variables and take them into consideration for future observations. If we insist on the kind of testing you're discussing before drawing any conclusions whatsoever, we'll likely be waiting forever as it will probably never happen. Therefore, the best course of action is to inform ourselves with the evidence available and remain open to reassessing our opinions as new evidence becomes available.I realize the difference. The terms “hard evidence” and proof are used interchangeably by people outside of science and math. The comparison made in this thread is useless unless you use bearings and washers in the same knife.
I strongly disagree. If we're going back to science we have to remember that controlled, double blind studies may be the gold standard, but given that there are many situations where such studies are impossible or unethical, observational studies are frequently used and no less important. This is a single data point, which means it's very far from definitive, but it allows us to examine the other variables and take them into consideration for future observations. If we insist on the kind of testing you're discussing before drawing any conclusions whatsoever, we'll likely be waiting forever as it will probably never happen. Therefore, the best course of action is to inform ourselves with the evidence available and remain open to reassessing our opinions as new evidence becomes available.
From my initial read, it is my understanding the metal swarth was blown out fairly soon after contamination. Then a full disassembly was performed, then more cleaning, then photos. So little time/use between contamination, to point where action was compromised, and cleaning.
stabman ,
In my experiences over the decades, plastic (Nylon, phenolics, etc.) can fairly easily become impregnated with debris that is harder than itself over use.
One Age Old Example: would be a large number of Cold Steel knives I have either owned or worked on for others. Many come NIB with metal debris in the pivot area (at least up to circa ~2012 when my experiences with CS folders declined sharply). If the knives are dis/re-assed before too much use, the washers can be cleaned easily. After some amount of usage metal particulates can become physically embedded into the washer causing the washer to slightly mushroom around the debris and tighten the action. Over time, can cause galling to blade tang, liner, and/or frame.
Had the metal debris been allowed to remain in the pivot assemble of the Nylatron bearing knife, I would expect metal particulate embedment into the Nylon bearing race :-/
RE: "the Nylatron washers on this knife fit with no visible gaps, but some grit got in there. Not much, but then the greater contact surface area touching the pivoting area seems to have worked against things, making it really, really gritty."
I read that to say, the washers provided feedback that the pivot was contaminated and needed cleaning/maintenance BETTER/SOONER than the bearing pivot, creating a condition that user would clean the debris before contamination had a chance to become physically embedded.
I freely admit that using a bearing system that requires no lube vs. lube is going to be better in a debris filled environment, AND that the air-gap created by the bearings vs. washers would allow compressed air to more easily blow out debris.
I would also admit that these newer types of bearing (without hollow metal cages) appear to be a superior application for a folding knife pivot. However, without introducing a flipper opener have little interest in bearing pivots (and I was early into the bearing knives with the Ikoma Korth Bearing System in Bali's and later adopted by CRKT in the First Production Acuto Steel frame-lock version Ripple by Ken Onion, later released as a aluminum handled liner-lock at significantly reduced MSRP.
I have had many fewer bearing pivot knives than washer and non-washer pivot knives combined, and have experienced more pivot issues with bearing knives than all others. Second in pivot related issues would be those with any type of plastic, phenolic, composite pivot components for the reasons mentioned above.
Those are my experiences over the last few decades.
YMMV with your own personal experiences.
--------------------------------------------------------
RE: "Real world experience in which a bearing knife outperformed a knife with washers. You seem inclined to argue with the basic facts presented because of your preconceptions."
Insipid Moniker ,
I am speaking from my own personal experiences, not as you mention "because of your preconceptions."
I suppose ..., if I have any prejudices based on my experiences, those could be classified a "preconceptions" (so, I give you a little there my friend ;-)
I just don't see "basic facts" presented that any of the pivot assemblies mentioned are "better" without an understanding of specific application and use (bearings do roll better than flat washers however ;-)
Not even mentioned the plethora of writings of others, and multitude of videos over the years related to various issues others have had with bearing pivots on folders (uhm ..., how about we consider the various Spyderco debacles with bearing, and/or ..., etc.). Yes, bearing pivots have gotten much better over the years. I still believe they are a solution to a problem that did not exist before flipper knives, and personally prefer NFF Knives (Non-Flipper-Folder) even though I do own a few bearing flippers ;-)