Update on 7" knife test concerning MAD DOG.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The present senerio, version III;

******
Kevin kickin' back LHAO as the camera fades in....

"...hahahahaha, and then I told 'em the notch was for...."

Uproarious laughter ensues, camera fades out.

******
If you were selling a piece of steel for that much, would you care?

JMHO
smile.gif


-Michael

------------------
Chefget's Knife Page
 
Just to emphasize this again:

We are more than willing to duplicate this test, any time, anywhere. If you think this knife was rigged or was a shill, or messed with or anything else, we will be more than happy to redo it with another ATAK. Heck, you don't even have to send the knife to us, send it to any FL Mad Dog dealer and we'll drive there and do it. We're not shy about this, anyone is free to witness the testing.

IMHO, the main problem with the Mad Dog was the chipping of the blade during the chopping portion, which should not have happened. That's been widely reported with his knives, but we'll see for sure. I also want to do a digging and prying test to see what happens, that should really show how some of these knives would fare under real use situations.

Spark

------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com

Insert witty quip here
 
The biggest question I have... Why are we just now hearing about these notched, stolen, defective blades?
 
What I do not understand is why Mad Dog does not send you a "real" ATAK unless he is hidding somthing or is afraid that the test will show the exact same results as the first test. What does he have to be afraid of if the ATAK is as good as Mad Dog claims??

To me this seems like somthing is wrong with Kevins claims as much as we hear all the complaining but see nothing factual from them backing up their claims. Mad Dog should comduct the same tests as Mike did with the same knives and post their results. Do this "live" on the net or with a few trusted people present to vouch for the results.

Or why not sent the knives out to someplace that can conduct the test objectively and then swear out a statement. As much as Mad Dog is complaining you think he would jump at this idea to prove without a doubt his superior product.

Personally I feel the test was done above the board with no personal prejuddism whatsoever, and am looking forward to more tests.
 
Mike, glad to see you showing class by not mentioning the nature of the ATAKs on your integrity. Thats what makes this forum and its members what it is. Mature.

A few points:

You had nothing to do with the knife before someone sent it to you, so even if it is a reject you can hardly be blamed. The x-rays and RC test will tell. Neither are you at fault for someone else's poor quality control.

The maker should put his knife where his mouth is and send you another.

Even if there are axes to grind your offer of a public re-test should quench any doubts.

jeff
 
Mikey,
What kinda mess have you gotten into now?<G>

Folks, I trust Mike Turber to conduct a test and remain impartial. If I didn't I wouldn't have sent a knife. Yeah, we[CAMILLUS] got hammered on part of the test, but we learned from it, and we will participate in future tests with BLADEFORUMS.

I also think that Mike should think about only including knives from makers/companies that WANT to be included in the test, or we will be going through this everytime. And that is more trouble than its worth....for everybody.IMHO......

------------------
Stay Sharp!
Will Fennell
Camillus Cutlery


 
The big question here is that you might affect those of us who had considered buying some of his steel knives but weren't a part of the cult. We might realize that there is nothing magical about them and that we will not really be able to slay dragons just because we own them. I personally have paid some big money for some hand made knives and I love them. I also have some inexpensive knives and I love them. Knives are different and really there is no knife for all uses, if there was I would be bored and you would be poor. Look back at some of the old articles in Fighting Knives magazine to see what they said about MD knives things haven't changed alot. Do what you think is right and be honest we on the forum can figure out the BS for ourselves. I too might have figured on some bias for the Busse (I am always suspicious of cult knives they always have let me down) but your report on the swedish knive settled that question for me, and now I need to buy one when I can get the cash!
 
The big question here is that you might affect those of us who had considered buying some of his steel knives but weren't a part of the cult. We might realize that there is nothing magical about them and that we will not really be able to slay dragons just because we own them. I personally have paid some big money for some hand made knives and I love them. I also have some inexpensive knives and I love them. Knives are different and really there is no knife for all uses, if there was I would be bored and you would be poor. Look back at some of the old articles in Fighting Knives magazine to see what they said about MD knives things haven't changed alot. Do what you think is right and be honest we on the forum can figure out the BS for ourselves. I too might have figured on some bias for the Busse (I am always suspicious of cult knives they always have let me down) but your report on the swedish knive settled that question for me, and now I need to buy one when I can get the cash!
 
I find this whole thing a little funny. Approximately 18 to 24 months ago when I was in the market for a Mad Dog ATAK, I ran across one at a gun show in Dallas, Texas on a knife table where it looked out of place (Why would a single Mad Dog knife be at a table full of Cold Steel and lesser knives?).

I asked Mad Dog himself through email if this guy was a in fact a legit Mad Dog dealer. Mad Dog confirmed the knife in question was shipped to this dealer and that he was not aware of any "knock-offs". Considering it was $225 it seemed like a good deal but, something just seemed fishy and I felt any Mad Dog purchase I made should go to Earl at Knifeforums/CFK&T (After all, that site was the only legit source for knife related chat after the other took a trip down the gutter through the sewer ....).

I find it hard to believe that someone who earns their living based on their reputation, on the quality and, on integrity of their knives, would approach this issue as described with regards to known defective blades. Is it really that hard to cut it in half or, bend it over or, notch the cutting edge, shear the tip off, etc? Why hide it under the grip? Do Mad Dog owners now need to X-ray their purchases from authorized Mad Dog Dealers? Do those same dealers now need to provide an X-ray of the knife shipped so the user knows they got a real one?

Things here just don't add up. What am I missing?

Sid
---
Knife dealer and FFL

[This message has been edited by Sid Post (edited 03 November 1999).]
 
Hey Rob gotcha covered buddy
smile.gif
And if you sign up and let me be a source for Talonite and sell exclusive knives in the BFC store I will guarantee you that your knife will win damn near ever test I do!
wink.gif


Actually I already have one of your knives ready to be tested. I will be testing your dive knife in "REAL WORLD" conditions. I don't have it yet but a customer of yours is willing to send me one for testing. I am a master SCUBA diver (And yes you can call PADI and verify that
wink.gif
) and will put it though it's paces. Based on what I know about Talonite it looks like it would make a KICK ASS dive knife!

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
www.wowinc.com
www.gigandknives.com
www.macedirect.com
www.dragon-forge.com
The above sites are pure shamless plugs!
 
Whew, maybe it'd be a good idea(as someone said earlier), if only makers who agreed to be tested are included. I don't always agree with Maddog's opinions etc, but it seems like he is pretty dedicated to his craft, why would he do something that would hurt his reputation?
I think Chefget's theory may have some merit though
wink.gif
.
Brian
 
Mr. Mad Dog,

I know you have read this. I have no axes to grind with you or anyone here. Your response would be appreciated though. I think that it could do nothing but put potential customers at ease and help your sales. If you do not respond, it leaves us wondering if we have to cut the grip off of our knives to deturmine if it is defective or not. There are many other questions that need clarified, but for such a high priced tool, I feel they are entitled to ask.

Sincerely,
Robert

------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword let him sell his garment and buy one." --Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36) See John 3:15- 18


 
Gus,

In all fairness to Kevin people just don't talk about those things unless they can prove who did it and where the blades went. He can't although his emails do mention names and very suspect dealers. I won't release that info as it is not my place or style.

And another issue that I feel needs addressing. When trying to determine how the handle should be cut, the handle material itself was in question.

How do you cut a material when you don't really know what it is?

G-10 was the main suspect and I think it was mentioned before but to read the specs on a Mad Dog dealer site you would think that you would need to do some sort of spectral analysis to determine waht it is as it does not say anywhere I could find. If anyone knows were MAD DOG directly admits what his handle material is please chime in.

Also in setting up the web pages I showed what each manufacturers handle material was. MAD DOG? So I went to several MAD DOG sites to get the official name of the material. There was not one. All of the manufacturers listed their handle materials as simple named materials like Resiprene “C”, Kraton, Leather, etc…

Not MAD DOG.

So listed composite even though I now know otherwise.

The below is not meant as a flame although it will have that perception in the minds of a select few. It is merely meant to inform you on the makings of a MAD DOG and is based upon information I have been forwarded and discovered on my on.
I do have some questions on his marketing methods when it concerns the specs he uses for his knives.

The following can be found here. www.streetpro.com
Mad Dog Knives uses Starrett 496-O1 high carbon tool steel on all steel
blades. Hardened, then selectively tempered, our blades have a Rockwell
C-scale hardness of 62 at the edge (hard as a file), and a HRC 50-54 throughout the spine and full hidden tang. This provides superior edge-holding ability with exceptional durability for prying and chopping. Each blade is then hard chromed, providing excellent corrosion inhibition.

The ergonomic grip indexes the blade in the user's hand, thus letting the user know how the blade is presented, even in the dark. MDK uses a glass/epoxy composite grip material that is compression bonded to the hidden full tang. With a compressive yields trength of 79,000 psi, the grip can withstand tremendous punishment with no damage. The composite grip material provides 1,000 volts per mil (.001") dielectric strength that
electricaly isolates the user from the blade. Our grip material is also
impervious to virtually all chemicals and solvents.

OK His edge is 62RC. This is too hard IMHO and that is why his blades chip. Also keep in mind you can not NAIL a 62RC every time and therefor some blades will sneak out the door with an even higher RC and on the www.knifeandtool.com site it shows a 62-63RC and that is why you see blades chipping. He says he has not seen this as a problem? OK.

Now he says the spine and tang are 50-54? OK the edge is dead on 62 but the rest of the knife varies from 50-54? OK fine. Now use a bit of logic here. You have a knife with a soft spine and tang but a hard ass edge? Hummmmm...

Ever do a stress test on a piece of steel? I bet that knife will snap big time in a vise. But Kevin would then say he does not make his knives to be snapped in a vise and that is a valid point. But the above will tell you
why the Cliff Stamp issue occurred. The same blade with different hardness at different points under stress will fail. Sorry, simply physics here.

Now onto the handle. Want to see some familiar numbers? Check this out.
http://www.norplex.com/tier3pgs/glaframes/g10.htm
The dielectric test on the chart was on a piece .062"and the value is was 60, giving you a 1,000 Volts for a .001" piece.
The compressive yield strength in the charts test shows 65,000. Kevin says 79,000 and that is fine as I remember another site with a similar number but can't remember where.
The rest of the info is also mentioned on the charts page. A simple search in Alta Vista will yield a ton of info on G-10.

So in a nutshell the handle is not some magic proprietary, composite handle material. It appears to me to be nothing more than G-10. That is fine and G-10 is a very well proven handle material but to make it sound like rocket science is used to make this magical super high strength handle is quite misleading IMHO.

The “GLUE” which is in the handle is no magic either. According to a former Mad Dog employee it is nothing more than Brown L’s Accra Glass Epoxy. That is fine too as it is a proven material but I think I heard it was some special process as well. Maybe it is now but not on this knife.

As I stated in the tests, Mad Dog makes excellent knives, and his fighters are absolutely kick ass! I also stated that his knife was no chopper and it is not.

He is the only maker to complain about my testing methodology and in his emails he flat out questions my integrity (that is the polite way to state what he said). So now that he questions my integrity I am simply questioning his. Is that a flame? Not in my opinion, it is merely my observation and since I can not post on his forum, I will do so here.

Again please do not start flame wars here. The above is pure information and is not meant to be a flame but a statement of fact. Sometimes facts are veiwed as flames. If necessary I will move this thread to community or TGTBTU but the facts will come out as my testing has been called a big lie.

That is fine as I actually expected it. Now that I have been called a liar and my test declared BS I will simply state the facts as Cliff did when his integrity was called into question. I am just not sure if I can be a clear and level headed as Cliff was
smile.gif
So I will try to be good and if you guys want I will not present any more facts.

Remember my number one rule. No personal Attacks please. Of course you can attack me as has already been done. Since I am the one who did the test having my results questioned due to my business relationships is fine. Again for the record I am no longer a distributor for any manufacturer including Busse. I will fill backorders and then I am done. All future orders go to JRS.

Man I think I just wrote a book!

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
www.wowinc.com
www.gigandknives.com
www.macedirect.com
www.dragon-forge.com
The above sites are pure shamless plugs!
 
This is really interesting...

I think that consumer reports (which is what these tests are)should be done regardless of the companies consent. They are selling these knives to the public, therefore the public (ie.bladeforums) has a right to create and express openly opinions of their products, and their quality.

Wouldn't companies love it if no one could ever say anything bad about the quality of their products?

Fortunately, this is not how it works. If you produce crap, you get a crappy feedback, if you produce quality, the response to the product is proportionate.

(I'd like to see x-rays of other ATAK's too).
 
...I saw this coming when the results were issued, I just didn't know what excuse would be used. It's totally illogical, and enough evidence has been presented to lead me to believe that the blade used was a normal MD knife, not a "reject" (why complete a reject blade?) or inferior piece. The knife came in under a busse...Big deal...but some see this as blasphemy, and can't accept facts that contradict their preconceived opinions...Even if the test is repeated with another ATAK, unless it comes out of these tests as "super blade", there will still be complaining and excuses...

--dan
 
Hey Walt
I am sure the MAS or KVP needed to penetrate the handle is not too great for even a lowly 300 ma machine. Most any medical or Veterinary facility would be able to x-ray the handle. Scatter should be no more than bone plates or other hardware. I am sure you or someone must have access to such an x-ray machine. Why don't you just radiograph those MD knives you have, run the film through the proscessor and post the results? It is not like looking for blade imperfections, just penetrating through the plastic.
If the knives were close to me I would be happy to have them x-rayed. Probably only cost 5-10 dollars and only take a few minutes.
It would be interesting to see how many were knotched.
Although frankly, most MD owners don't seem to care one way or the other.
The results wouldn't change many minds, but for the sake of truth, it would be interesting.
Jim
Mike,could you post the quote from MD regarding the knotched tang?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top