This Remington (I call it a Bullet Wannabee) knife has been with me for nearly a year now, but has recently surfaced from my accumulation for some attention. It has also been riding in my pocket for the last couple of weeks while I try to tidy it up some. It was not mis-represented on the aution site, but I was really expecting something different than what I got. It looks to be a second, or maybe a lunchbox knife, and really should have hit the trash bin instead of making it out the door to the public eye. Or is it possibly a poorly executed re-handle? I'm not sure.
The handle scales seem to lack a taper to the bolsters; they are blunted where they meet the bolsters and are quite proud of the bolsters on either side. The handle rivets and backspring pivot pin seem to be reversed in regard to material used, none of which has been properly installed/finished - sharp edges around the edges of the heads. The same holds true for the lanyard bushing. I've hand filed, sanded, and polished them into a nearly useable state.
The blades look to be made of stainless steel, yet they both have a generous amount of pitting. All others I've found on-line of this pattern, have a bullet shield, and are listed as having 440 Stainless Steel blades. Also, somebody over-polished the blades with a power buffer. Both blades are extremely lazy ,and neither snaps open or closed worth a hoot. No Bullet on the handle either. One other item of significance... the jigging is different than any othe R1173 I've found on-line since last August. Pile side stampings is as follows: Clip = 1983 Spey = R1173.
Can anyone answer the following questions please?
Would this likely have been a Camillus built knife?
Would this be classified as a Baby Trapper?
Would that Clip blade be a Turkish Clip?
I like the style, feel, and heft of this knife, even with all of its faults, but am very glad I didn't pay much for it. Any and all input will be appreciated.



