What's so special about a bushcraft knife?

Bushcraft is not survival.

Thank you. But some of your friends disagree. Some seem to imply that bushcraft skills are required to survive. I think they're different ideals all together.

Bushcrafters do not get defensive about our knives.

If you say so. Some of the posts in the thread would tend to not support that.

Bushcraft IS playing in the woods: it is so perfect an adaptation to living outside the city that it can be fun.

Again, thank you. I think I said something similar.

What you are describing is not bushcraft. Go make a thread about Man vs. The Wild. I will not join in with comments about how a Spyderco Cricket is the best knife for fighting off a mountain lion.

Strawman anyone. I don't think anyone in here is making such wild claims. My point of view is not as wild as you would suggest just to discredit it.
 
Well Steeljunky - truthfully your rant above is starting to make you sound a bit trollish. I hope that you spend more time in this area and keep an open mind to new things instead of trying to conform everything into your own personal world view. Please don't forget that you started this thread asking a question and then somewhere you forgot to listen.

No... i didn't. I completely got that a bushcraft knife is a wonderful wood working tool. I never lost that point. Where I am standing my ground is the opinion (By just a few only) that anything other than such a knife is useless in the woods. And that's just dumb.
 
Steel-Junky, with respect, it seems like you're being unnecessarily confrontational. Relax, man.

Have you read Cody Lundin's book "98.6 Degrees"? If not, I recommend it. He's a survival expert - not a steel addict like us - and he makes extensive use of a thin scandi-ground blade for survival tasks. Doesn't seem to be much of a problem for him, and he has had more bush time than most of us.

Don't get me wrong - I'm a fan of thicker blades. My go-to woods knife has a 5" blade and a thick spine, and I often pack a BK-9 when I'm on an extended outing. My EDC is a small, thin, scandi-ground fixed blade. It gets used all the time. Does it excel in the same areas as my BK-9? Of course not. Is it more practical in other areas? Absolutely. Does that make one better or worse than the other? Nope.

I'll check out the book. I read everything I can get my hands on. I'm still not suggesting that a thin scandi isn't a useful blade. I just know that it can't do everything well... no knife can. But as an all around utility knife... I can definitely see they're value.
 
G'day Steel-Junky

....
So far I've been told that bushcraft is about wood working skills making crafts with a knife... now you say that part of bushcraft is also know where to find ingredients for food in the wild... see I think that is just survival knowledge and not a part of what I've been told that in this thread at least what bushcraft is all about.

IMO, this quote from Richard Harry Graves is the best written description of bushcraft I have yet to see:

" "Bushcraft" describes the activity of how to make use of natural materials found locally in any area. It includes many of the skills used by primitive man, and to these are added "white man" skills necessary for survival, such as time and direction, and the provision of modern "white man" comforts. The practice of bushcraft develops in an individual a remarkable ability to adapt quickly to a changing environment. Because this is so, the activity is a valuable counter to today's specialisation, and particularly significant in youth training work."

Even though equipment has its place, to me Bushcraft has always been more about knowledge and skills.

IMO, when you have the ability to live with the land for extended periods, the whole concept of "survival for three days" becomes a pretty mute one.

Bear in mind as always, everyones mileage may vary :thumbup:


Kind regards
Mick
 
LMAO. Real consistant bro.




Win? To win there'd need to be a prize. What could any of us possibly win over a debate here. And debate is healthy. An educated thoughtful person will hopfully walk away from a debate having learned something and maybe even with some new ideas. I know I have. Where as I don't really see the need for a knife known as a bushcraft knife... I have begun to think that perhaps a small kit of wood carving knives would be a great addition to my kit. So I have walked away with a new idea. Now are you saying that many hear ALWAYS win the debate... is it because they refuse to hear other ideas and consider different points of view? Kinda sad if you ask me. But whatever. I came out of this with something. I came out with the idea that perhaps some wood carving tools would make survival tasks easier. And I also came away with the idea that the points where bushcraft and survival differ aren't of any real importance or value to me since I don't see them as particularly useful survival skills. But to each his own. If someone finds value in making a pipe in the woods... I hope they have a ball. Because that is a very bushcrafty thing and has nothing to do with survival. Now making a shelter or trap... they can exist in both realms I guess.



OMG are you that insecure? They are little. It wasn't meant to make anyone feel inadequte or small. They're just not big knives. You maybe need to not attach what you carry on your belt to how you feel about your power as a male. You completely took that the wrong way. I call my mean street a little knife. You can probably go the Busse Forum and quote me as saying "She's a beautiful little thing". Why... because it's a little knife. It's a hell of a little knife too.




Actually (And I haven't read every single post either) I don't think anyone did say why laking a pipe in the woods is a good idea. Only that if that's there thing to so be it. I mean I get it... someone would want to cause they think it's fun. And that's cool. But it doesn't aid in staying alive.

Now one member did distinguish between surviving and thriving. I get it. I still don't see that as a useful survival skill. But a wonderful craft and something I'd tell another man straight up... I can't do. I can't carve a figure out of wood either. But it's ok. That won't help me stay alive either. And since wood craft is not my hobby (Shooting is) it doesn't matter. Not to say it isn't valid or worth while... just not interesting to me. I used to build models... some people find that boring as all get out. It's cool.




I don't even know what this means. No one said a bazooka was a good outdoors tool. And no one said a MORA wasn't a useful knife. Did you read a post I didn't? Some of you keep trying to turn this into me saying that a MORA or other bushcraft knife isn't good. I never said that. I wondered what was so great about them. And from what I've read they're great wood carving knives. So there it is. Where people have gotten their feelings hurt is by suggesting that a Busse is not a useful wilderness knife... and this is just stupid. It's a wonderful wilderness knife. Where it may lack is in the ability to make a pipe. A skill I don't find all that important. And this is where bushcrafty guys get pissed because they think I'm somehow challenging their hobby and their choice of knife. When in fact it's the other way around. My choice of knife and my choice to not consider wilderness pipe making as useful is what's coming under fire and getting people upset. And that being the case is just sad. But whatever.




Some, incorrectly so, have.




Wrong... I didn't know what a bushcraft knife was other than what they looked like. I really wanted to know why they had become so popular all of a sudden and why so many people have started making them. I wondered what I was missing out on. And I find out that they are wonderful all in one wood working knives. That's great. I have not disagreed with that from the begining. What I have disagreed with is that some say a Busse is not a good wilderness knife... it can't make a pipe. It can't carve a statue of liberty figure... but it can do all the tasks required of a knife that would allow on to survive in the wilderness.




God forbid anyone disagree with the popular opinion.




No... this is where you're wrong. You lable infalmitory as me not just jumping on board and saying "WOW Bushcraft is neato".



Wasn't trying to pick a fight. But I won't walk away from one either. I didn't already know what answers I'd find. If so... I wouldn't have asked the question. You don't see me starting crap on other threads do you? No. But just like you'll defend why your MORA is so great... I'm gonna defend my Busse. The difference is you feel righteous about your stance and like I'm a troll for mine.




WOW... you must just be very unhappy with your life. You are just wrapping way too much of yourself into this. I'm gonna back off of you because you seem like you're taking this way to seriously. I will say this... I didn't suggest that a chopper does it all. Like I said I like to play with choppers, field knife sized blades... and little (Notice I said little) utility blades like my mean street. And I think they all serve wonderful purposes. I can appreciate why someone would take pride in being able to thrive in the woods for an extended period with just a small 10 dollar knife. That's a cool ideal. But it's just not one a share. I take three knives with me in the woods. Sometimes if I'm going in with my pack I have several different types of tools. I can appreciate that you are trying to learn to do everything with one knife and make what you need as you go along. My ideal is different... take what you think you'll need so that you won't have to do without or struggle improvising. I'm of the better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it school. You are part of the make it if you don't have it school. Both are cool.

I am taking this way to seriously...hmmm, so you are not? I thought that you were intellingently trying to learn through debate? Dont misunderstand my posts for anger...trust me, I'm good.
I am insecure, and unhappy with myself...while you speculate on my state of affairs..and dissect my post, you are basically refusing to do 2 things,
1. differentiate between "bushcraft" and a "bushcraft knife"...or is this part of the overall plan.
2. listen to other posters, that have patiently tried to answer your questions.
The old saying.."dont ask questions you dont want the answers to" I think applies. If I am correct, and I think I am..the OP Question was.."what makes a bushcraft knife so great?"..this then lead into the " I have a Busse, why cant this work? type of direction...basically the old dow eyed bait and catch ploy.
The bottom line is, without a play by play...you want to state your idea of "survival" ...declare it to the whole forum...and then, when others, who I might add, have just a little bit of info in this area...add there ideas or suggestions..you ask more questions..questions that imply your dissagreement. This is called, passive agressive. Since you alluded to my mental state of being..I will make an assumption to yours..you get into ALOT of arguments.
By the way,..I am extremely unhappy and I do have a small knife...so your jabs at me really, really really hurt. Now I am gonna go sharpen my FFBM..because it makes me smile.
EDIT: just to be clear..I have owned 12 BUsses..they are awesome knives..I am not arguing knives here.
 
Last edited:
Seriously, a bushcraft knife is any knife you can do bushcraft with. What is bushcraft? Go read the thread where everyone defines their opinion of what bushcraft, wilderness living and survival skills are.

The puukko-style knives and their heavy duty versions are just one style that some people like for bushcraft. They aren't the only design that works.

BTW carving spoons and pipes are woodworking skills, and knives, even scandi knives suck balls at it. What really works is these:
162.jpg


Scandi knife for carving bowls? I've seen it done more often with axes.

Bushcraft knives don't need to be able to do heavy work, because a chopper (axe, kukri, machete, big knife) would also be carried by the bushcrafter. The "only one knife to do it all" -- beit a SAK, puukko, or Battle Mistress is a mythical beast, and IMO we'd be better off not searching for it and just understand that to do "everything" you're best off with at least two tools.

Now it seems some guys don't know this, so don't think I'm being condescending, but: Busse does make other knives than the Battle Mistress, OK?
 
Thats funny.. He calls you insecure. Isn't he the one that went on the defensive after a few thought that their choiless and guardless 4" thin Scandi knives may be a lil better suited for precision cutting tasks than his hard use knives. Then didn't he say that he liked the fact that he, along with some others could stand on his knife if he had to. I wonder which one of his 9 Busse's he does that with........
 
I agree with you... the trouble is that there are also those who are confusing bushcraft as a part of survival skills as well. To suggest that a Busse knife is not a good wilderness knife because it doesn't excel at bushcraft is mind numbingly rediculous.

As I said earlier I was unfamiliar with what Bushcraft really meant. i was under the impression that it was a set of wilderness survival skills... but apparently it isn't it's old school primitave wood working skills... which is great and a wonderful craft. I guess it would go under the wilderness skill portion of this forum. I was mainly more leaning towards the survival.

You replied to my post so I think its fair to reply to yours. BTW, I hadn't noticed that you were the OP. I didn't mean to make it sound like you were hijacking the thread.

Is a Busse a good wilderness knife?

Kinda hard to answer. That's like asking if a Toyota is a good vehicle to have in the snow. Land cruiser, 4Runner, RX350? Absolutely. An Echo or RWD Tacoma? Not so much.
Honestly, I think the Busse Cultellus looks like a fine woods bumming knife. That scotch tape knife (can't recall the name)? No way.

A knife in a wilderness setting, whether it be survival or woodsloafing, is essential. No matter how thick, thin, long, short, stainless, light, whatever.

As for the posts that can be misinterpreted as heated by any of us, we need to relax. Like James Terrio posted. 9MM Vs. .45.

I see these debates all the time and they end the same way. Chevy Vs. Ford. Bow Vs. Rifle. Fly Vs. Spin fishing. They end up as ammo for the anti knife crowd. "see? They can't get along with each other. If they were in the same room they'd stab each other to death. We need stricter laws!!"

We'd all be better off working together than against each other.

;)

Sorry. Felt like playing Mr. Mom there for a second.
 
Sorry Rupretris,
I didnt catch that..I was out running around stabbing people;)
YOu were joking right? I am wondering what we are still trying to answer in this thread? The OP's questions were answered dozens of times in a dozen different ways.. Now I'll stop, before the internet police notify the other ANTI knife groups out there..and we all get busted.
 
Sorry Rupretris,
I didnt catch that..I was out running around stabbing people;)
YOu were joking right?

Of course I was joking. I just don't like to see knife knuts argure with other knife knuts over something as silly as this. I guess I was trying to get the "agree to disagree" point across as well as the point that not all Busse knives (or Becker, Ka-Bar, Kershaw, or any other production knife) can be lumped together by name alone and be called the end-all-be-all. It just doesn't make sense to me.
 
Me either...but, its Friday..and ...well, its a dirty job, but somebody had to do it.
I actually like that you were trying to put out the fire, but this has gotten pretty much all the mileage its gonna get..no thanks to me, so I wouldnt worry about it. Gene
 
Last edited:
jeeeezz.... this thread has really taken a turn...:o

so we all like different knives, for different things, that's how it is... the pissing matches are not necessary
 
I'm having a heck of a time fitting a step stool in my BOB.

You and me both.:rolleyes::D



jeeeezz.... this thread has really taken a turn...:o

so we all like different knives, for different things, that's how it is... the pissing matches are not necessary


Tell me about it, theres just something about people realising that there isnt a best knife, nor is there one thats going to work for every thing.

Steel junkie, I have to admit your not making a good stay as your start on this forum, and that is just gonna dig your own hole as you go one furthur, wether thats good or not, time will tell. Making the personal attacks on fellow members that have been here long befor you, and have set a stardart for this forum is not a good way to start. You need to understand that everyone is going to have a personal preference, thinking your way is the only is not the way to carry out in a place like this.

In the end, like most have said or wanted to, its going to come down to what you know, just because you think one knife is better than another is your own opinion, you need to respect others thoughts.


I dont even know where this thread is going now, nor do I really care. I would however like to know what all the bitching your doing is for, what anwsure are you looking for?
Plenty have said what the point of a bushcraft knife is, but then it just goes into what you think survival and bushcraft means,as well as bickering and petty arguing that just pisses people off.

Either way, im behind Gunknifenut and every other regular supporter here, unless you bring your self back up, and show some sign of respect for other members your gonna sink fast.:thumbdn:
 
The OP started off asking, what's a bushcraft knife for. Folks stepped up and told him what it's for. Turns out, he likes a different style of knife. No controversy there, just preference. Coffee or tea? Apple or orange? No problem, there's plenty of both for everyone.

So shut up already, Steel-Junky. You write fairly well and seem to have experience with what you promote. But you're fighting a battle that doesn't exist, and insulting people rarely convinces anyone. You're burning bridges that could help you out in the future. Dare I say, some regulars have fueled this fire, and that's no better.

I apologize for my harsh words, gentlemen. I don't want to offend anyone or get into a pissing match. But this has run its course. Could we all call a truce and just move on?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mors_Kochanski

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushcraft


My Busses cant make twine or cordage easily or properly.
My Scandis wont cut or baton big pieces of dead wood.
You really need both. They both have their advantages.

You can't beat a good scandi for small chores, making traps/snares, notching. They cut with great control and make complex projects on small materials outdoors much easier.

There really is no reason to compare a Busse to a Scandi type blade or argue about it. Busse hasnt entered the scandi wave. They are a different breed with their own strengths.

Give me a plain CGFBM or a HHFSH and a Skookum, Woodlore or Koster scandi grind and I'm good to go. All bases covered.
 
Where I am standing my ground is the opinion (By just a few only) that anything other than such a knife is useless in the woods. And that's just dumb.
Appartently you only hear what you want to hear.
Any knife is better than teeth and nails when outside, even a cheap pakistani folder, doesn't mean that's what I want to have.

The bushcraft knives are small knives: that's a choice with plenty of limitations but plenty of advantages too. That's a very common debate with well know arguments and counter arguments which won't be solved today nor tomorrow.

Truth is small knife are capable of most tasks required in a survival situation (making shelter, spliting wood...), sure they won't perform as quick as big knives, but if you consider the how often do I have to cut a tree in half vs how long will I be carrying the thing small knives have a point.

Now if you accept the small knife choice: is there anything a "bushcraft knife" can do a small knife like a busse game warden can't. Probably not, in fact, considering Busse wonder steel, there are probably things Busse can do the BK can't. Yet for most common tasks, thanks to better ergonomics the BK will (probably) perform better.

Actually since people like Busse and others have an edge on other-the-top steels and other wonder techniques I've always wondered why they don't apply to proven design like the puukko (BK is basically a puukko) instead of sticking to those outrageous fantasy designs.
 
Last edited:
So far this is the truth of the matter that I am getting. They're wood working tools. Not survival knives.

That depends on what your idea of a survival knife is. If it's the usual "big knife to do all and replace an axe as a chopping tool" then sure, the Scandi style bushcraft knives aren't survival knives. Personally, I don't really care too much for the whole survival knife concept. It isn't that relevant to me. I just want to carry a knife that does the jobs that I expect I will find useful to do. I've carried my "bushcraft knives" and puukkos as "survival knives", and they've done just well. Once, I screwed up a little and managed to fall through thin lake ice in the winter, and used one of my puukkos to pry myself out of there. The puukko did fine, and if it isn't a bushcraft knife, I don't know what is! In that case, it did just fine as a "survival knife", too, in the sense that I used it to survive my own mistake. Was glad I had it with me.


Yes and no... see I would never suggest that a Battle Mistress would make a great carving knife. However... you can do some fine work with mean streets, and Active Duties, and Game Wardens. Those are three different blades that could lend themselves wonderfully to carving wood in the right hands.

I would still say just no. Sure, the BMs are way too big for carving stuff. But, I also own five Game Wardens, an Active Duty and a Meaner Street and do like them (although I hate the choil and guard they have), and I have played with other small Busses as well. Not even the Boney Active Dutys or Cultellus models are something that I would want to use for woodworking. The bushcraft style knives I referenced earlier do much better in woodworking than even the smallest Busses, by virtue of more efficient grind and overall design (especially with regard to handle parts, since there are no choils and guards to interfere with work) for such tasks. For really rough use, the small Busses sure beat a bushcraft knife, but the small Busses still lose in woodworking performance to said bushcraft knives. So, I wouldn't say that the small Busses would work wonderfully in woodworking. Of course, that all depends on what one will compare them to. Compared to a Battle Mistress, the Game Wardens sure work a lot better in woodworking. Compared to any of my handmade puukkos, the Game Wardens flat out suck in woodworking. It's all relative, and a guy should carry what he feels fills his needs best. If it's just woodworking performance and ergonomics he's after, he ought to go for a puukko or some other bushcrafty knife. If one desires a really, really tough small knife that you can pry and beat stuff with, then the Game Wardens and other small Busses would be the better choice. It depends on what you do out there. I do a lot of carving and small stuff. Some of the tools I use in my kitchen I make myself out of wood, for my own amusement (and to save money, sometimes - it's not much, but it helps, and every once in a while I can buy me a new knife with that money ;) ). Someone who doesn't really like carving will probably prefer a very different knife.

Again... depends on the model... A thin Game Warden is not going to work at the same chores as a Battle Mistress.

Naturally! But I will say again that even the thinnest, smallest Busses aren't very good for woodworking as they come out of the factory. They are designed for hard use, and this is reflected in their rather beefy grinds. And even the thinnest ones have the problem of not having a Scandi grind (which gives you a lot of precision compared to other grinds, although there's obviously no magic to it) but having a lot of choil and guard in the way. But then, this is somewhat of a matter of tastes. Some folks like guards, some folks don't.

With the exception of carving eating utensils... I know for a fact a Busse will do all those things. Cause I've done them with one. Don't know about carving a spoon or a pipe because I just never really cared enough about such a task to try.

Yes, a Busse will do those things. I've carved a decent spoon with a 8" long ~.23" thick Busse NMSFNO. It wasn't too bad. But I can do it a lot faster and much more comfortably with a 3.5" puukko or other similarly styled "bushcraft knife." Also, I could use a 2 $ Chinese made folding knife to carve a decent spoon or make traps, but it wouldn't be a very efficient or reliable tool. The point here is that any knife (even a stone knife) can be used for making stuff and cutting stuff. Any, absolutely any knife is useful to have in the woods, and better than your bare hands. But some knives do some tasks better than others. A Battle Mistress sure will outchop my puukkos, and a Game Warden will sure pry better than my puukkos, but the puukkos do much better in working wood. :) You should carry the knife that you know will do the jobs you want to do best. For me, sometimes it is a Busse, sometimes it's a traditional, simple puukko.

Are you saying it's impossible for your hand to slip up on the blade? Because to say it's never happened to you is meaningless... because even if it had you wouldn't admit it because it hurts your argument. So to say it hasn't doesn't mean anything. Statistically speaking.... probability wise... is it impossible for your finger to slip onto a knife whose blade has no finger guard. I will give you a hint my saying that it's entirely possible to slip onto a blade WITH a fing guard... so what does that tell you about one without?

It's the same dumb argument about Glocks not having a safety... You're right the safety or guard is in the user... but people get accidentally shot with Glocks all the time. And this is coming from a guy that carries one on a daily basis.

It obviously isn't impossible in theory, and some folks have had it happen to them. I will say, though, that when you use a knife with care and skill, the chances of your hand slipping up on the blade are smaller than the chances of being hit by a freak meteorite. :D I'm not sure I like the part where you say I wouldn't admit slicing my hand up even if it had happened, because it wouldn't help my argument. That sure sounds a lot like calling me a liar. :eek: But nevermind that.

People often forget that while some things just randomly happen outside any human influence (we can't really do anything about the light of the stars or the movements of the moon), not all things happen outside human influence. Blades don't just jump around and cut you. If they cut you, it's because you screwed up, or some other guy accidentally or intentionally cut you with one. I don't worry about my hand slipping up on the blade. I just take care not to cut myself. It's not hard. I don't really know what else to say. It's a lot like these new computer controlled traction control, stability control and anti-locking brake systems in cars these days. Some folks think you can't drive a car safely without those things. Some folks know that you can, because they do it every day and have done it for about 40 years. Then, there are some folks that know that you can, but still choose to use these new systems just so they'd have all the help they can get. I have no problem with that, as long as they don't come telling me that I should let a computer drive my car for me. :D It's the same with knives. I don't want a guard, because I don't need one, and it actually gets in the way much more than it helps. If you think you need a guard on your knife, then you should have a guard on your knife. That only makes sense, and the decision is always yours - it's nobody else's business what kind of knife you choose to carry. In discussions like this, the idea isn't to convince others to change what they carry, just to discusss the merits and downsides of various types of knives in a friendly fashion.

If being able to carve a spoon, or a pipe, and make a wicker basket is so charming to people why carry one crude tool for the job... why not take a small wood carving set into the woods... I've seen 5 piece sets that can fit in your pocket... wouldn't that be better than a knife for wood work? I just gave myself a great Idea by the way LOL... That's what I'm gonna buy instead of a "Bushcraft Knife"... a small simple set of wood carving tools and toss them in my pack.

There are a number of reasons why I don't carry dedicated, curvy, weird carving "knives" and assorted tools with me. The most important is that I just don't feel the need, since I can do a good job with my puukko already. Then there's the weight and space thing: why should I carry even more stuff if what I carry now already does the job as well as I want it done? And then, if the tools are small enough to fit in a pocket, they can't be very good or ergonomically comfortable for anything except very small tinkering. Then there's the whole tradition thing: folks have been making stuff with puukkos here for a long time, not needing much fancier tools. It's a good skill to have, since sometimes you might not have a full set of special carving tools with a chainsaw to boot. :D

I'm not sure how I would summarize that. Perhaps like this: There isn't any one "best knife for everything." There are, however, "best knives for the job." You should figure out what jobs you want to do with your knives, and then carry the knives that do those jobs best. If you anticipate a lot of smallish woodworking tasks, then carry one of them "bushcraft knives." If you want to chop, pry, dig and bash, and also do some cutting (but nothing too precise and prolonged), then carry something in the tactical, survival style knife range.
 
Screw this for a raggedy thread. Instead of generating more heat than light why don't you all team up and conclude the thread by burying a hatchet in me. I'll give you a target:

I think both the “survival knife” school and the “bushcraft knife” camp have something very particular in common, the grail of “the one knife”. The representation of that I prefer is that of Tarzan. It's a complete fabrication but people chase it never the less.

Tarzan A] Is fighting out of the involuntary corner. He usually wants a big strong “one knife” for everything. Time and again we loop around boring ourselves silly explaining to people why that notion sucks. With a better grounding in reality it is often pointed out that a range of tools, oh no that dreaded and dreary Nessmuk trio, will stand the would be survivor in better stead.

...but because Tarzan A is usually associated with over hyped, over priced, over sized tools, his sitting duck[ness] all too often allows Tarzan B to slink quietly away in the shadows...

Tarzan B], the bushcrafter with his Scandi, is no less of a weird contrivance. True, they can usually assume higher ground in as much as with the emphasis on skills “there is no fight”, and nobody is surviving anything. The nature the survival mentality rails against is the same nature the bushcrafter seeks to work with. To borrow from a Rambo movie; “what you call hell he calls home”. Aha, but therein lies the twist. People who usually live, or have traditionally lived, in such places don't go in for the one knife thing either. Whilst I can already hear the Scandi being sharpened ready to let forth a torrent of “but a bushcraft knife is the best at carving wood and my grandad can prove it”, it is a fact that a Scandi bushcraft knife is every bit the compromise at a jack of all trades the survival knife is. The frame might be around a different portion of the vista but there is underlying commonality. Liberated by the addition of other tools, perhaps some dedicated wood carving tools, “the one Scandi bushcraft knife” doesn't need to exist either. And I dare say that better results would be achieved as a consequence. Can you see that exactly what is weak about “the one knife” when it is a survival knife is the same what is weak about “the one Scandi bushcrafter”. Little surprise that indigenous groups relevant here in actuality used a range of tools and did not go Tarzan with “the one”.

Once you can get your head round that all you have left is to establish where you'll make your compromises. You can't carry everything so you must pick what to load up on. Personally, I despise Busse for many reasons, but the facts are that a guy with a big thick Busse lump and a small dedicated woodworking tool set might actually achieve superior results at bushcraft and woodwork than the guy with a famous name in-one Scandi bushcrafter. What is so special about the Scandi bushcrafter then? Naff all!! Unless of course you want to loop back into the Tarzan trap of “the one knife”, and all the imagery, embellishment, and blatant fiction that goes with that. Same applies in reverse. What is so special about the Nuclear-Meltdown-Butt-Munch-Mistress in beige, bugger all if you've got a nice axe, a decent kitchen knife, and box of Stanley blades.

Either way, many of the problems arising from these kinds of discussions could be avoided by removing some of the underlying assumptions. The cardinal assumption is that of “the one knife”. People would be so liberated if they resisted thinking like that. It inheres in questions like “what is so special about X knife” in a contorted way that people who are truly at home with a range of tools tend not to ask.

For the benefit of the thread I shall not respond, but I'd be greatly obliged if every contributing member so far could buddy up, pool resources, and throw as much sh1te and spite at this post as you can. Get it out your systems for fek sake, and let's move on. :-)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top