- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
- Messages
- 8,578
Hmmm... IMO, there aren't shades of wrong - it is either right or wrong. How do you know the money made by selling counterfeit knives isn't pumped into another criminal enterprise involved in terrorism? At least I don't. Many such small profits made with not-so-honest means end up in a bigger pool of crime more often than not, and it is hardly surprising non-democratic countries involved in such acts.
Counterfeit knives, and knives that look like a reputed knife (inspired, homage) without acknowledging the original maker is a NO GO for me. And I do not support dealers who sell such homages as well. It's not political, just a moral stand I take. If I can't afford the real deal, I won't buy it. Living beyond ones means isn't exactly a good lesson especially if you have kids! ;-)
If here are no shades of wrong then why do we have shades of acceptable punishment for a given action. Or do you feel a person who runs a stop sign should be treated on the same way as a person who commits a violent crime? As for your question how do we know the counterfeit knife market doesnt fuel a larger more sinister plot? You dont. But i am willing to bet you cant know for sure that ANY company is or isnt tied into some higher organized crime. There simply is no way to tell. But if i am to make assumptions for one then i have to make assumptions for all. And i dont really like to assume anything, good or bad.
One thing most people fail to realize.....
When you support the maker, designer, whathaveyou of a legitimate company with the rights to produce their design.... you are supporting a legitimate and legal business with employees that offers them benefits.
When you support a company that makes clones, knockoffs or whatever name makes you feel better....you are more often than not supporting a criminal enterprise that could care less about it employees, offers them nothing but employment at substandard payscale with no benefits..even slave and child labor. By doing so you are conspiring with this criminal enterprise to commit an illegal act. It has been shown that some of these criminals also use their ill gotten gain to traffic weapons, drugs and white slavery, among other nefarious activities.
As to those that prefer the name "homage".... it is a matter of morality.
Is it moral to copy anothers design so closely, even though devoid of trademark? Is it moral to make your money on the backs of those legitimate companies and designers whose hard work to bring the item to market you had no hand, time or capital invested in?
Do you have any proof of how counterfeit goods are made and more specifically knives? And if we are going to draw such lengthy parallels between purchasing a product and therefore conspiring with a criminal enterprise then we have to be mindful of other parallels that can be drawn. One for instance being this very forum. It has a strict no clone, homage or replica policy yet i have seen many paid dealers who sell those very products. Why has no attempt been made to distance the forum from those dealers if this cause is one of such dire consequence? What about the russian, and american companies who have and still do violate patent and trademark laws? I dont have a problem if people really believe in this cause. But it does bother me when it seems only to apply to some.
This is nonsense. A thief is a thief no matter how well he does his job.
If a thief takes your design and does a better job of making it, you are going to be ok with giving him carte blanche to do so?
If a thief is a thief then is it not a bit biased to not ban the discussion or promotion of knives from makers who have proven to steal designs like microtech? After all if a thief is a thief its more than just chinese counterfeiters that should be held accountable. And really how many makers get a start replicating the work of loveless or randall knives? But a loveless will always command a premium no matter who replicates it or even improves on it. A maker should rely on his quality and execution. But with so many makers only familiar with tossing water jet parts into a tumbler i can understand the desire to focus on stolen designs. I think its a pointless argument. If you design a completely original knife these days its either ugly, unusable or both.
Last edited: