- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
- Messages
- 7,809
The tool is just that, an inanimate object.
The "intent" of the person charged is where the case will be made or broken by your defense attys [ if they are smart enough ].
As well, the proof would have be in evidence that you knew of that video, perhaps having bought that video, not strictly on the fact you carried a certain product.
If that were the case, the KaBar could be illustrated as a killing weapon, afterall, it has been used in the military for decades, not only as a "tool", but also as a "weapon" of opportunity.
Ot take the Striders as an example. The smart prosecutor could make the case for soldiers carrying them into combat, and thouhg one may never have been used for killing, it could be stated that these folders are used in a combat threatre [ the inference to the jury would be the same, that you are carrying a knife that combat soldiers carry ].
Or to go one step further, one good prosecutor could take the ER straights, whose design of some were expressly made for miliary ops. The list is endless in reality if the prosecutor wants to dig deep enough.
It's the "intent" of your carrying that weapon that will be the issue if your attys are good enough, not the folder you are carrying or the adcopy of that product [ which you may or may not have been aware of to begin with ].
Brownie
You were doing fairly well up until this post, now your really reaching.
That's really wishful thinking. "your honor, my intention of good deeds should far outweigh the fact that I was carrying a Katana."