Worst YT reviewer/knife channel ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
four_shore said:
thanks for the post jim.

not pointing out any channels is perfectly understandable.

however, i don't view you as someone who would become defensive (borderline furious) over some criticisms.

to those offended..

if you can't take the heat, get out of the spotlight..
Click to expand...


I really don't get offended at all really. :D

My videos these days are just shorter versions of the forum reviews for the most part.

I try and keep them simple and straightforward.
 
Nullity said:
I have much to learn from you.
Click to expand...


There are better YT reviewers than I am no doubt in my mind.

I like doing forum reviews the most because I can really show what's going on and get into details with good photos.
 
Ankerson said:
There are better YT reviewers than I am no doubt in my mind.

I like doing forum reviews the most because I can really show what's going on and get into details with good photos.
Click to expand...

You're all about the drama.

Don't lie. :p
 
El-Duderino said:
It's one thing to be constructive in your criticism, it's a whole other thing when you start a thread with Worst YouTube channel as part of its title.

'Advice and Helpful Criticism for Youtubers' would have helped steer this thread in a better direction.

But right off the bat saying 'Worst' starts the whole thing off in a downward spiral that you're not going to recover.

Also, what's the purpose in this thread? None of the comments that have held on topic have aided to anything at all. Because the topic is pertaining to who you think sucks.

The general consensus here is 'If you don't like a channel you don't have to continue watching.'

Which begs the question, why start this thread?

This is the first thread I've joined in on of yours FS, probably my last... Depending on how you decide to conduct yourself with your next OP.

Just like I do with YouTube channels I watch, if the person who makes the vids continues down a road filled with trifling subject matter, I most likely won't return.

But I'm not going to talk trash about them. There is no point.
Kinda like this thread... if only to help you understand the simple error of your thread. Then, perhaps there would be a point to this thread, but only for that reason.
Click to expand...


have you read any of my posts? i've repeatedly pointed out total hypocrisy in statements like "if you don't like a channel you don't have to continue watching".

if you don't like the thread than you don't have to continue posting...

i'm willing to bet that a different thread name would've generated the same results.

we get it man, you absolutely hate this thread and everyone that doesn't agree that there is no such thing as a flawed YT reviewer.

please feel free to read my responses to the 15 people that already asked what the purpose of this thread is.
 
I concur with the above statements. Ankerson should take note for future forum reviews on new super steels. Nothing says your knife stays sharp better than extreme amounts of cutting done on those sea vermin's skin.
 
dflores said:
I concur with the above statements. Ankerson should take note for future forum reviews on new super steels. Nothing says your knife stays sharp better than extreme amounts of cutting done on those sea vermin's skin.
Click to expand...

I will take it under advisement. :D
 
Wam bam thank you mam!! Thread is now irrelevant! And ankerson, do not think I am not being serious ;) I hear baby seal hide is quite expensive, so I am now taking forum donations(feel free to send me custom knives and anything pretty or shiny).
 
dflores said:
Wam bam thank you mam!! Thread is now irrelevant! And ankerson, do not think I am not being serious ;) I hear baby seal hide is quite expensive, so I am now taking forum donations(feel free to send me custom knives and anything pretty or shiny).
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to start an argument, but "hide" implies that it has been prepared for human use. (Wikipedia!)
I am referring to live, squeeling, baby seals.

Thanks. Carry on.


(I know it's only text, but typing "squeeling" was rather arduous.)
 
I literally just tried to imagine what a squealing baby seal would sound like..... And it sounded GLORIOUS!!! And according to what everyone says in this thread THEM BE FIGHTIN' WORDS!
 
dflores said:
I literally just tried to imagine what a squealing baby seal would sound like..... And it sounded GLORIOUS!!! And according to what everyone says in this thread THEM BE FIGHTIN' WORDS!
Click to expand...

Are you implying ... a duel?
 
Ground Rules:
1. There are no rules
2. It must be recorded and put on youtube
3. Must be posted in this thread to get "feedback & critique" on how we could have done better.
4. After all is said and done smokeeater908 must make jerky from the meat of the dead baby seals in one of his contraptions and put it on youtube.
 
four_shore said:
when i said MM was a mental case it was meant to be humorous. the fact that he made a video rant about how i have no solid evidence that he is a mental case is utterly hilarious. isn't he the same guy that called me "stupid" because i couldn't see that his pietermoore challenge was a joke?

oh, i get it. it was just a bad joke. i don't physically believe that you have mental disorder but your YT vids create that image for you (at least IMO).

thanks for the response.
Click to expand...

My video about you and this thread was not a "rant" merely about how you have no solid evidence that I am a "mental case." My point in that video was that nothing you've said has been substantiated, including that particular claim. Your claim that it was intended to be humorous is interesting, but I'll buy that you intended it to be humorous at my expense. The fact that you now claim you were just trying to be funny when nothing about your comments or this thread has been satire or comedy is still rather interesting. I can't prove that it wasn't humor, because it is difficult to read such intent into a statement like that. All I can say is that nothing about the statement itself or its context would have indicated that it was humor.

Now, on to the pietermoore challenge video. That video is not a "joke" in the sense of "knock knock, whose there?" It was a "joke video" in the sense that it is satire. While you think it isn't funny, many people found it quite humorous. Unlike your thread, which purported to be serious, my video was ridiculous in every aspect. The title itself is ridiculous, the subject matter is ridiculous, and the ending should really give it away. When taken in context with the rest of my channel, it becomes fairly obvious. Yes, it is possible that someone who doesn't know me could come across the video and take it seriously (Sort of a POE's law type thing), but I don't believe you are that type of person. Several of your comments directly imply that you are very familiar with my work, thus it seems as though you purposely chose a video you knew would give you the best chance of misrepresenting me to people who were otherwise ignorant to my channel.

If you know my channel well enough to rapidly go dig up that video, then you most certainly knew it was a not serious video.
 
mindsmirror said:
My video about you and this thread was not a "rant" merely about how you have no solid evidence that I am a "mental case." My point in that video was that nothing you've said has been substantiated, including that particular claim. Your claim that it was intended to be humorous is interesting, but I'll buy that you intended it to be humorous at my expense. The fact that you now claim you were just trying to be funny when nothing about your comments or this thread has been satire or comedy is still rather interesting. I can't prove that it wasn't humor, because it is difficult to read such intent into a statement like that. All I can say is that nothing about the statement itself or its context would have indicated that it was humor.

Now, on to the pietermoore challenge video. That video is not a "joke" in the sense of "knock knock, whose there?" It was a "joke video" in the sense that it is satire. While you think it isn't funny, many people found it quite humorous. Unlike your thread, which purported to be serious, my video was ridiculous in every aspect. The title itself is ridiculous, the subject matter is ridiculous, and the ending should really give it away. When taken in context with the rest of my channel, it becomes fairly obvious. Yes, it is possible that someone who doesn't know me could come across the video and take it seriously (Sort of a POE's law type thing), but I don't believe you are that type of person. Several of your comments directly imply that you are very familiar with my work, thus it seems as though you purposely chose a video you knew would give you the best chance of misrepresenting me to people who were otherwise ignorant to my channel.

If you know my channel well enough to rapidly go dig up that video, then you most certainly knew it was a not serious video.
Click to expand...



i didn't claim that everything said here was a joke did i?

my comment toward you wasn't meant to be taken literally. i thought that was fairly obvious...

and yes, i've watched a handful of your videos. let me ask you this, have you ever hesitated to make a video because you were afraid of the

outcome?

that's the difference between YT and BF's.

you guys can trash whoever and whatever you want with no consequence.

i've spent almost every response defending my right to ask what YT reviewers are enjoyed the least and why.

have i not backed up most of my claims? have i not answered 98% of the hasty responses maturely?

me not providing evidence that you're a mental case is like you not having proof that i am "gay" as you so intelligently labeled me.

i'm sorry to disappoint you, but i do in fact have a gf..wait, that's right you were joking.

you think i'm "stupid" for making this thread? talk about the pot calling the kettle black...

again, i've seen your videos. i doubt this debate will get you any additional subscribers but at least you got some attention from it.

thanks
 
x4cto gets my vote

He's too obnoxious to watch because he seems to go out of his way to mention his supposedly great sexual prowess and big d*ck. After the first few times, it stopped seeming like a joke and appeared to be an issue for him. Does he mention these things to deliberately make small d*ck guys feel bad? And how does he know that he has a big d*ck, anyway, unless he's a closet "p*cker checker" in the YMCA shower room? My psychiatrist brother said that he has a syndrome called pen*s obscession or envy or something like that. I could only tolerate watching a few of his videos before canceling my subscription because he made me feel dirty and wanting to take a shower.
 
holymolar said:
x4cto gets my vote

He's too obnoxious to watch because he seems to go out of his way to mention his supposedly great sexual prowess and big d*ck. After the first few times, it stopped seeming like a joke and appeared to be an issue for him. Does he mention these things to deliberately make small d*ck guys feel bad? And how does he know that he has a big d*ck, anyway, unless he's a closet "p*cker checker" in the YMCA shower room? My psychiatrist brother said that he has a syndrome called pen*s obscession or envy or something like that. I could only tolerate watching a few of his videos before canceling my subscription because he made me feel dirty and wanting to take a shower.
Click to expand...

that's absolutely hysterical and true.

thanks for staying on topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top