Allan,
Weren't you arguing against the ricasso and choil in another thread because it shortens the cutting edge?
No, not the Ricasso,
I talked about that fact I believe that Choil cut-out is always getting in the way and snagging.
But I strongly support the flat non-sharped ricasso area infront of the handle.
I dont think I will ever own another knife that has the choil cut-out section in front of ther handle.
It's way more trouble than it's worth.
It's always getting in the way and snagging, and because you have to stop the matterial you are cutting from getting even close to it, it's pointless to defend the choil on the grounds it makes sharpening easyer.
The fact is that any knife that has such a cut-out has less real usable cutting area , thus there is no need to sharpen that area anyway.
However, the ricasso is a very important part of a good survival knife design and I would always have a 3/4" inch ricasso on such a blade to allow placement of the finger there.
When you look at the design above, you can see how you could slip a finger infront of the guard with an extra 1/8" or so of flat ricasso area.
I believe this would be very handy to be able to do.
The length of the knife above might be a bit short for me, it might be nice for the blade to be atleast as long as the handle.
However what I like about the design is that it could be used in so many situations .
I like that fact that it has no guard.
A guard limits the ability to use a knife, while making the knife a lot more safe to handle.
Thats fine for a Hunting knife, but with the many "un-knowns" that come with the context of a true survival situation you got to have as much use of of the knife as you can.
I like the idea it dont have any saw teeth, (I always thought such things were a joke to use) nor other add-ons that look good but soon become pointless in the field.