I'm a new member, but I did lurk off and on for a fair while before joining...
In my limited experience, I could see that Cliff was troublesome. He had technical knowledge (to what extent? how relevent? debatable) but was also arrogant and superior, and to make it worse was also abrasive and at-times beligerent, yet evasive, inconsistent and selectively "deaf" when challenged. A real charmer.
Yet noone and nothing is perfect, you have to take the bad with the good, and you also (if you're particpating in, or, running a community) have to set and live by rules. Seems the mods judged CS's contributions were worth putting up with his charm, so long as he lived by the rules like everyone else. Stepping over the line, breaking the rules *everyone* lives by, insulting the forum and the owner... no his contribution was not special enough to overlook that.
I think that's how it worked out. Oldtimers agree?
In my limited experience, I could see that Cliff was troublesome. He had technical knowledge (to what extent? how relevent? debatable) but was also arrogant and superior, and to make it worse was also abrasive and at-times beligerent, yet evasive, inconsistent and selectively "deaf" when challenged. A real charmer.
Yet noone and nothing is perfect, you have to take the bad with the good, and you also (if you're particpating in, or, running a community) have to set and live by rules. Seems the mods judged CS's contributions were worth putting up with his charm, so long as he lived by the rules like everyone else. Stepping over the line, breaking the rules *everyone* lives by, insulting the forum and the owner... no his contribution was not special enough to overlook that.
I think that's how it worked out. Oldtimers agree?