Chris Reeve Destrution Test On Youtube?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've batoned my Project I through wood... it held up fine. Lost some of the coating but that was it. No other damage...

So what else must I do to 'prove' this is a tough knife? Try to break it with a sledgehammer?

Ridiculous...

And why do people keep comparing knives with cars? What does one have to do with the other? Cars are not crash tested to see if the metal will stand up to the impact. They are tested to see if the driver and passengers will survive. The car manufacturers KNOW the metal will crumple like paper. Hence the airbags, crumple zones, etc etc.

If you want to test a knife - test its CUTTING ability. That is what it is designed for.

The parts of this test that are controversial are the parts where he purposely tries to break the knife. Why? Because this is patently an idiotic thing to do. And all right-thinking people recognise it as such. So some knives survived the test. Well, bravo!

ALL equipment can fail under extreme conditions, no matter how expensive or 'tough' it is. Just ask the military. It's called 'Murphy's Law'.

Which is why people who place themselves in life-threatening situations will have a back-up.

Hence the old saw: "Two is one, and one is none."

You did watch that video I assume. Did you do same what Noss4 did at third video in about 8 minute?

Thanks, Vassili.
 
No I didn't watch the whole video. My time is too precious to waste.

I'm just telling you about my personal experience of batoning my knife through hard wood in order to make a camp fire, a task which it handled to my satisfaction.

I have therefore 'tested' the knife myself and it performed perfectly well. Of course, my test was done with the object of making a fire in mind, not to destroy the knife.

Whatever Noss does in his test (I have a pretty good idea of what is involved from reading these threads) has no relevance to my own personal requirements of the knife.

BTW here is the knife... you can see where the coating was removed as it went through the wood.

CRK003.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've batoned my Project I through wood... it held up fine. Lost some of the coating but that was it. No other damage...

So what else must I do to 'prove' this is a tough knife? Try to break it with a sledgehammer?

That's what Noss does. In case you missed it, in fact you did, as you say you don't watch the videos - Noss also batons with wood.

If you want to test a knife - test its CUTTING ability. That is what it is designed for.
So I ask again, what are we doing with 1/4" thick knives for cutting. Thicker blade stock reduces cutting ability and increase material cost, shop time, and labor.

The parts of this test that are controversial are the parts where he purposely tries to break the knife. Why? Because this is patently an idiotic thing to do. And all right-thinking people recognise it as such. So some knives survived the test. Well, bravo!
purposely tries to break the knife - these are destruction tests... it's kind of the point
 
So I ask again, what are we doing with 1/4" thick knives for cutting. Thicker blade stock reduces cutting ability and increase material cost, shop time, and labor.

:thumbup: Putting thick tactical knives like the CRK Project I into cutting tests against knives actually designed only for cutting is not going to look pretty. The thick tactical knives would be completely destroyed by knives costing only a fraction of their price. Here in Scandinavia you can buy a knife that outcuts such thick tactical knives easily for the price of a cup of coffee and a donut.

Fact remains: thick knives aren't designed only for cutting. If they were designed solely for cutting tasks, they would be thinner. Well, I'll soften my statement a little. It could be that even thick tactical knives are designed only for cutting. But if that is the case, then the designs are simply atrociously bad.

I do so wonder why some are working very hard not to answer this question about cutting performance and blade thickness and geometry in general.
 
Elen---Well said!
BTW---This Thread will fizzle out soon. Sorry to extend the misery. :)
 
Well, the Project I is designed for cutting and chopping, and I would imagine that batoning is part of the chopping process and a thick spine is a definite benefit in this regard. It all depends what you are cutting. In the field, there are not so many delicate tasks, but I believe the P1 is adequate for MOST tasks. But I would battle to carve a spoon with it, for sure.

But even in the back country I would have a SAK on hand for that sort of task. And by the same token I wouldn't baton with a SAK (tried it once with a OHT, buggered up the lock tolerance). The right tool for the job...


So I ask again, what are we doing with 1/4" thick knives for cutting. Thicker blade stock reduces cutting ability and increase material cost, shop time, and labor.
 
No I didn't watch the whole video. My time is too precious to waste.

This is rediqulos! I have no time to waste to read your posts - how about that?

If you join discussion about tests on video can you please at least check what are you talking about and watch this video. Especially if I point you at exatc point where it happen - third clip, 8 min you do not need to "waste" you valuable time.

You have time to dismiss this tests without even look at them.

You are wasting our time!

Thanks, Vassili.

P.S. I guess this is common here - people start yelling and crying about some fictional knife smasher based on just "Destruction test" name and no one ever see those videos!
 
Last edited:
I found this quite interesting.
http://www.barkriverknives.com/docs/batoning.pdf

Yes, the article states that any knife can easily be broken with improper batoning technique. Theoretically, the CRK knives should do just fine if you always baton correctly.
The article mentions several knives made of A-2 (BRK) that broke easily while batoning (wood on wood). Many people have said that because Noss hit the knife with a hammer, it was destructive. According to this article, it doesn't matter what you baton with, if you do it improperly the knife will break.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Noss always batons improperly. Yes, it's possible that some knives go through the wood batoning part without being hit in the wrong way, but once you get to the cement the forces inflicted are much greater, and if the knife is going to snap by batoning it will.
 
I found this quite interesting.
http://www.barkriverknives.com/docs/batoning.pdf

Yes, the article states that any knife can easily be broken with improper batoning technique. Theoretically, the CRK knives should do just fine if you always baton correctly.
The article mentions several knives made of A-2 (BRK) that broke easily while batoning (wood on wood). Many people have said that because Noss hit the knife with a hammer, it was destructive. According to this article, it doesn't matter what you baton with, if you do it improperly the knife will break.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Noss always batons improperly. Yes, it's possible that some knives go through the wood batoning part without being hit in the wrong way, but once you get to the cement the forces inflicted are much greater, and if the knife is going to snap by batoning it will.

Well if you read that article to see what is right way to baton and watch Noss4 video to check how he actually baton 2x4 - it is absolutely clear that he doing this right way - exactly as it is on page 5 of that article.

So you do not need to go limb - just compare this article with video - it is simple, even it take some effort it is minimal, I did it in few minutes.

Thanks, Vassili.
 
So, is it a "tactical" knife for "tactical" uses? Or is it a "cutting" tool for "cutting?"

Stop crying, the knife broke, 2 of them. So the question remains;

$10 = http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/LargeImage.aspx?sku=DBA-443

$300= http://knives.cx/store/images/CRK_PROJECT1.jpg:eek:

Just because you are stupid and selfish and a democrat, does not make you right. BUT, you are free to love any blade you wish! I love Helle knives, but I know and understand they are not "hard use" blades so they would not stand up to any serious abuse.

(( Insults like this are for trolling, not discussing. Don't do it. ))

Wait, they are not advertised as "rough use blades", so I guess I cant make that comparison.

You spent $300+ on a VERY nice looking knife that is good for cutting, and light baton work. That is fine. Good job. I personally like the knives, a lot. BUT when I hit the back country and I can not bring, axes, saws, small blades, medium blades, large blades, chainsaw, ice auger, sledgehammer, I will bring a Busse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
with hammering a knife you can show tough it is,not easy to break,but is it handy knife?is it as effective as an axe? take a CRKT hissatsu for example.if you hammer that knife it will certainly break quite easy.but when it comes to stabbing someones ass with a knife I would take the hissatsu over the so much admired busse anytime.handspeed,MUCH more agility with it.
that busse is built like an axe,as heavy as one.without the wood hacking effectivity of an axe.it hasn'tgot the leverage.an axe is an axe a chisel is a chisel and a knife is a knife.the Kabar for example isn't chosen only because of its price.it is functional.lightweight,and quite tough.
 
So, is it a "tactical" knife for "tactical" uses? Or is it a "cutting" tool for "cutting?"

Stop crying, the knife broke, 2 of them. So the question remains;

$10 = http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/LargeImage.aspx?sku=DBA-443

$300= http://knives.cx/store/images/CRK_PROJECT1.jpg:eek:

Just because you are stupid and selfish and a democrat, does not make you right. BUT, you are free to love any blade you wish! I love Helle knives, but I know and understand they are not "hard use" blades so they would not stand up to any serious abuse.

Wait, they are not advertised as "rough use blades", so I guess I cant make that comparison.

You spent $300+ on a VERY nice looking knife that is good for cutting, and light baton work. That is fine. Good job. I personally like the knives, a lot. BUT when I hit the back country and I can not bring, axes, saws, small blades, medium blades, large blades, chainsaw, ice auger, sledgehammer, I will bring a Busse.
you cannot bring axes, saws, small blades, medium blades, large blades, chainsaw, ice auger, sledgehammer but you can bring a Busse?what kind of arguing is that?

doesn't sound very intelligent does it?
why not bring a barbell with you or dumbbells?
if you like to carry metal around anyway..:jerkit:

and keep your stupid comment about democrats moron.
look at what mess your party made,with Bush.

financial crisis due to your beloved republicans.
go for another war.
that's what you love don't you?

you probably claim that your Christian too dont you?


(( Ridiculous thread, ridiculous rhetoric, this part of this post isn't even vaguely related to the topic, just ignorant and unacceptable personal insults. Chill out, all of you. -- And no, I do not claim that I am a Christian, like that has anything to do with knife choices. :rolleyes: ))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A Busse PD will easily penetrate. ;)

I would rather have a Gladius than a Busse.
Busse is an ugly fat heavy knife.way overrated.the thicker the knife the worse it is at cutting and slicing.
why do you think butchers knives are so thin?
it is all a false sense of security carrying such a heavy clumsy blade around.it is a knife for people who wear a belt and braces at the same time.

for close combat there are MUCH better options.light weight blades are the way to go.
 
with hammering a knife you can show tough it is,not easy to break,but is it handy knife?is it as effective as an axe? take a CRKT hissatsu for example.if you hammer that knife it will certainly break quite easy.but when it comes to stabbing someones ass with a knife I would take the hissatsu over the so much admired busse anytime.handspeed,MUCH more agility with it.
that busse is built like an axe,as heavy as one.without the wood hacking effectivity of an axe.it hasn'tgot the leverage.an axe is an axe a chisel is a chisel and a knife is a knife.the Kabar for example isn't chosen only because of its price.it is functional.lightweight,and quite tough.

Once again, Noss is primarily trying to find out how tough a knife is. Even if the model you love broke on the first test, if it does what you want it to then that is the knife for you.
I use a Benchmade Nimravus for work. It probably wouldn't even last a few minutes in the test, but I like the knife a lot for what it does (good edge retention and cutting ability). I don't need that knife to be "tough". If I were looking for a "tough" knife, then I would greatly appreciate if it were a model that had been tested by Noss, because then I would have a better idea of what I could expect it to do without breaking.
Noss is not trying to tell you which knives suit your needs best, or how to use them. He is trying to show you what a knife can take before breaking.
Hey, notice that? The important part is not that the knife breaks, it's all the stuff that happens before the knife breaks.
 
Not All Busse's are thick stock. Get with the program. :)
Light? Oh yea! Warren Thomas or Mission Titanium knives.
Now, Back to the madness.
You know, this Thread could end right now.
 
Esav.

On my opinion - once we finally get close to what is really those tests and that CR fail in not too harsh condition - no abuse, no intentional destruction. Here we have this thread turned into ridiculous rhetoric.

As a moderator you may be should look at this carefully. IMHO some just trashing valuable and resonable test, simple because their favorite manufacturer does not looks good.

Please, see my transcript of this video and video themselfs.
Do not get into this fiction of intentional knife destruction - please, watch videos - 3rd clip 8th minute

Thanks, Vassili.
 
From parallel topic - I just write down step by step those "stupid and pointless destruction for entartainmet". See for yourself:

Let then goes over Noss4 video for Project I step by step to see this "knife destruction for entertaining".

He introduced knive - as A2 thick heavy duty one piece...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0H8EFC26vw

1. Peel apple, (I tests on potato) - shows basic ability to use knife for "fine" thing like food prparation, reasonable test and Project one doing all right.
2. Slice an apple - reaonable test to me - show that blade is bit too thick for fine slicing.
3. Cut 10000 pounf ribbon cutting
4. Control Cutting of 10 000 pound ribbon
5. Cut same with serration
6. Chopping 2x4 - not a good chopper according to Noss4. get some energy to do. not heavy enough...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ2fT...eature=related

7. Cut 10000 ribbon after chopping - cut well no difference on the edge.
8. Batooning firewood hitting with wood - done.
9. Cutting Ribbon after batooning. - less sharp.
10. Tip break test on 2x4 "dig through" - perfect shape after testing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VmWJ...eature=related

11. Tip test on metal - snaped off very tip few mm but no any serious non fixable, compare holes with holes from other knife. Reasonable test for survival knife.
12. Batooning through 2x4 with 3 pound steel hummer

I would say he hit it very gently, defenetely without intention to destroy it with blade about 60 degree to wood) until at 8 minutes it breaks very easy without actually any hard hit and at the different point from where he did hit it with hummer, but near handle. Also it was clearly surprise for Noss4 he did not really expected this.

So is it stupid and pointless destruction for entertainment, unrepeatable etc, etc, etc?

Thanks, Vassili.
Edit/Delete Message

Right here with transcript.

Thanks, Vassili.

Oh, 2 and 3 link is not working:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ2fT6pL4xQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VmWJOAJB5I
 
Esav.
On my opinion - once we finally get close to what is really those tests and that CR fail in not too harsh condition - no abuse, no intentional destruction. Here we have this thread turned into ridiculous rhetoric.

If It is rediculous rhetoric, all who posted here,myself included, were involved in that rediculous rhetoric and yes that includes you and stage2. Opinions differ about these tests and as i've stated before all the browbeating in the world will not change them.

When Noss4 posts his videos, maybe they should just be watched only, as it just starts controversy,possibly their intended purpose and IMHO isn't doing anybody here any good. Forum members, prospective buyers noone.


nozh2002 said:
As a moderator you may be should look at this carefully. IMHO some just trashing valuable and resonable test, simple because their favorite manufacturer does not looks good.
When you guys come here and trash a very well respected and great knifemakers entire line on the basis of controversial tests, testing a miniscule amount of his product, what do you expect? Do you think anyone will respect you or the tests because of it? If it was done in a respectful manner in the first place,maybe there would've been discussion.
To tear down anothers notoriety and integrity to gain your own is very wrong, and i hate to see people hurt in such a way.

How about letting this die, as the battle is far from won on either side....but has been clearly over for some time.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top