jeyr said:
Indeed I was wise enough to NOT speak for others, nor attempt to stir up a situation for no other reason than to bring some meager limelight to myself.
Obviously you're not that wise at all, Jeyr, because now you're speaking for me. Suddenly, it seems, only after Ernest Emerson has made his own views known, you've become a psychic who claims to know what I think.
That's not the reason I raised the issue at all. I truly believe it's a design issue. I think it's a very insightful reflection into
your character that you see other people's motivations in the worst possible light. In psychology, that's known as "
projection". You're attributing your own petty motivations on to me.
The irony is your original assertion is
also wrong.
I never claimed to speak for Ernest Emerson. I pointed that out
several pages back.
Vaako said:
When you're done all of that, please show where I claimed that Ernest Emerson did have an "issue" with being stolen from. I never said he did or didn't. I said other companies were stealing his design. I never discussed how Mr. Emerson felt about being stolen from because I know better than to make the mistake you did.
As it turns out, Mr. Emerson feels other companies aren't. My views on the knives in question were and remain entirely my own. Again, in your frenetic zeal to pin some kind of "blame", you've made yet another factual error.
And then Ernie was polite enough to put that particular arguement to rest for EVERYONE save perhaps for you. Now if you are inferring that Mr. Emerson is speaking falsely, or is in some other way being false, well then you are simply MISTAKEN, once again. Ernie is a STAND up guy, he will tell you what he thinks, all you have to do is ask.
Yes he is, he's told everyone he's friends with Strider Knives. Since he's a stand up guy, he stands up for his friends.
As for the strength of my convictions, well I have been following this thread since its inception, and I found myself in a quandry, should I make my thoughts known and further cloud or muddy the thread up. Further prolonging the inevitable revelation that your arguement was TOTAL bunk?
If you've been following the thread as closely as you claim, you seem to have joined many in avoiding one of my central points. No one has shown a knife of that profile made before Emerson. Mr. Emerson claims Strider didn't get the design from him. Fine. Who
did they get the design from? Who made a knife like that before Ernest Emerson?
Not to mention, dragging the thread away from the original intent which was to bring to light, once again the deplorable marketing of Lynn Thompson
...which I myself pointed out repeatedly, along with his copying.
and then politely point out that speaking for another person (Ernest Emerson and Emerson Knives) or even implying that they had been ripped off was in incredibly poor taste and showed a remarkably out of control ego?
...considering I never spoke for Ernest Emerson and my views were always my own, both points of yours fail. When is pointing out a maker getting ripped off "incredibly poor taste"? Everyone, including myself, has pointed out that Strider is getting "ripped off". Is pointing that out "poor taste"? Of course not. More projection on your part.
and yet your reply serves to once again begrudgingly get you a bit more of that amazing limelight..... I am more than happy to help you with your limelight needs.
On the contrary, I see no reason to humor you. You've had no involvement in this discussion except for taking the opportunity, now, to lecture me with your attempts at sagacity. Like I said, a carrion eater feasting on a dead issue.
If there's any "ego gratification" involved, it seems to be on your part, Jeyr.
You've adopted a self-appointed position of lecturer full of advice and whatever nuggets of wisdom you feel I should learn. No one else has, even those I heatedly and repeatedly disagreed with haven't done so. Only you.
You've even gone so far as to appoint yourself forum spokesman,
truly speaking for others with such inane pronouncements as
"You are forgiven, for your little rant about Emerson being ripped off... Now off with you to do something productive for a change."
Who are you to speak for others on the thread, administering collective forgivness? Or when it is given, or which people will give it?
...and here you are, still dispensing such good advice about "not speaking for others", about the dangers of "an out of control ego?"
Jeyr, you really should take some of your own advice before dispensing any to me.
And finally, after having pointed out how this thread manages to get off topic so frequently, I am more than willing to contribute to another thread preferably in the whine and cheese area so that Vaako and I can discuss our differences. I would really like to see this one get back to its intended purpose, which was to SHOWCASE, Mr. Lynn Thompson of Cold Steel fame, and his DEPLORABLE marketing and outright theft of design.
Oh get off of it, Jeyr.
That's the oldest forum ploy in the book. You're not fooling anyone. If you really felt that way, you would have never started lecturing in the first place.
You would have privately PM'd me with your great advice.
But you didn't. A private discussion wouldn't stroke
your own ego,
the way a public one does.
Nevermind Whine and Cheese, if you TRULY are dedicated to returning this thread to its original topic why not reply via PM?
--------------------------
Anyone want to lay bets Jeyr's sanctimonious dedication to returning the thread "on topic" is a sham?
Maybe he's going to "prove me wrong" by returning to the same mute interest he had before Ernest Emerson weighed in.
You think?